journal article·2004-03

Tribological Behavior of Polymers Simulated by Molecular Dynamics

Witold Brostow, J. Adam Hinze, Ricardo Simões

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 19· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Using molecular dynamics to simulate behavior of polymer surfaces during scratch testing, we report the first results of computer simulations of scratch behavior of noncrystals. A previously described procedure for creating realistic polymeric materials on the computer [W. Brostow, A.M. Cunha, and R. Simoes, Mater. Res. Innovat. 7, 19 (2003)] and used until now to simulate mechanical behavior of metals [S. Blonski, W. Brostow, and J. Kubat, Phys. Rev. B 49, 6494 (1994)] and one- and two-phase polymers [W. Brostow, A.M. Cunha, J. Quintanilla, and R. Simoes, Macromol. Theory Simul. 11, 308 (2002); W. Brostow, A.M. Cunha, and R. Simoes, Proc. Ann. Tech. Conf. Soc. Plastics Engrs. 60, 3105 (2002)] was applied. While experiments provide only the macroscopic penetration depth and the recovery (healing) depth, the simulations give the behavior of each macromolecular chain segment at each moment in time. We report results for one-phase polymers and also for systems with varying concentrations of a liquid crystalline (LC) second-phase that acts as a reinforcement. We relate the local structure to scratch resistance and recovery. The orientation of the chemical bonds is a major factor. The presence of a LC phase improves the tribological properties; however, the effect is not as significant as might have been expected.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Goldman · Proc Ann Tech Conf Soc Plastics Engrs. · 2002 · 60 · 1363
2. Zambelli · 1998
3. 10.1002/pen.76028120410.1002/pen.760281204 ↗
5. 10.1021/j100172a04510.1021/j100172a045 ↗
6. 10.1002/1521-3919(20020301)11:3<308::AID-MATS308>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/1521-3919(20020301)11:3<308::AID-MATS308>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
7. 10.1002/pen.76028120410.1002/pen.760281204 ↗
8. Goldman · 2000
9. 10.1038/3509501810.1038/35095018 ↗
10. Goldman · 1994
11. 10.1002/pi.128310.1002/pi.1283 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.47244210.1063/1.472442 ↗
13. Cook · J. Polymer Sci. · 1988 · 26 · 1988
14. 10.1063/1.174395710.1063/1.1743957 ↗
15. 4 Brostow W. , Damarla G. , Howe J.A. and Pietkiewicz D. (unpublished).
16. Brostow · 1986
17. Brostow · 2000
18. 10.1007/s10019-002-0161-y10.1007/s10019-002-0161-y ↗
19. Brostow · 2003
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.649410.1103/PhysRevB.49.6494 ↗
21. Brostow · Proc. Ann. Tech. Conf. Soc. Plastics Engrs. · 2002 · 60 · 3105
22. 10.1016/0040-6090(94)90317-410.1016/0040-6090(94)90317-4 ↗
23. Fossey · 2000 · 63
24. 10.1021/ma00103a01810.1021/ma00103a018 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00358-610.1016/S0043-1648(00)00358-6 ↗
26. 10.1007/PL0001078410.1007/PL00010784 ↗
27. 10.1016/0254-0584(85)90043-410.1016/0254-0584(85)90043-4 ↗
28. 10.1002/jcc.54002041310.1002/jcc.540020413 ↗
29. 10.1080/14328917.2003.1178475410.1080/14328917.2003.11784754 ↗
30. Hess · 2000 · 519
31. Good · 1993
32. Rabinowicz · 1995