journal article·2011-05-28

Effect of solvents and stabilizers on sol–gel deposition of Ga-doped zinc oxide TCO films

Ido Winer, Gennady E. Shter, Meirav Mann-Lahav, Gideon S. Grader

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 26· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Gallium-doped zinc oxide spin-coated thin films have been prepared by the sol–gel method. The influence of two solvents, isopropanol and 2-methoxyethanol (2-ME), and two chelating agents, monoethanolamine (MEA) and diethanolamine (DEA), was investigated. X-ray diffraction shows preferential (002)c-axis orientation of the crystallites influenced by the doping content and starting solution composition. Better orientation was obtained with 2-ME as a solvent because of a slower evaporation rate during the spin coating. Better orientation was also obtained using MEA as a stabilizer due to the weaker bonds formed with the Zn2+ions. Typical film thickness was 550 nm. The transparency of the films was greater than 85% in the entire visible range. A sheet resistance of 68 Ω/□ was obtained for the ZnO film doped with 2 at.% of Ga using 2-ME and MEA as a solvent and stabilizer, respectively. The results show that the denser packing created using a high boiling temperature solvent and a low organic content stabilizer improved the layer’s electrical and optical properties.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/3/03510210.1088/0022-3727/42/3/035102 ↗
2. 10.1088/0022-3727/40/22/00810.1088/0022-3727/40/22/008 ↗
3. 10.1088/0370-1301/67/10/30610.1088/0370-1301/67/10/306 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.08.11010.1016/j.tsf.2007.08.110 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-008-2929-y10.1007/s10853-008-2929-y ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.05.07810.1016/j.tsf.2007.05.078 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.216528110.1063/1.2165281 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00286-910.1016/S0040-6090(02)00286-9 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08512.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08512.x ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mseb.2007.01.05010.1016/j.mseb.2007.01.050 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cap.2009.09.02010.1016/j.cap.2009.09.020 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.physb.2006.02.03210.1016/j.physb.2006.02.032 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2010.01.01010.1016/j.vacuum.2010.01.010 ↗
14. 10.1179/174328407X15851410.1179/174328407X158514 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRev.93.63210.1103/PhysRev.93.632 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0921-5107(03)00128-410.1016/S0921-5107(03)00128-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.06.01310.1016/j.tsf.2005.06.013 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10971-009-1982-610.1007/s10971-009-1982-6 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.09.02110.1016/j.ssc.2009.09.021 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.06310.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.063 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.19410.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.194 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.04.04310.1016/j.tsf.2005.04.043 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0167-577X(01)00231-210.1016/S0167-577X(01)00231-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.10.04710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.10.047 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10971-010-2249-y10.1007/s10971-010-2249-y ↗