journal article·2014-12-14

Effect of film thickness on the stretchability and fatigue resistance of Cu films on polymer substrates

Byoung-Joon Kim, Hae-A-Seul Shin, Ji-Hoon Lee, Tae-Youl Yang, Thomas Haas, Patric Gruber, In-Suk Choi, Oliver Kraft, Young-Chang Joo

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 29· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

The thickness dependence of the electrical stability under monotonic and cyclic tensile loading is investigated for Cu films on polymer substrates. As for monotonic tensile deformation, thicker films show better stability than thinner films due to their higher ductility and the larger capability of strain accommodation. For the fatigue resistance, however, a more complex behavior was observed depending on the amount of the applied strain. For low strain amplitude in the high cycle fatigue (HCF) regime, thinner films exhibit longer fatigue life because the larger strength of thinner films suppresses dislocation movement and damage nucleation. However, for high strain amplitudes in the low cycle fatigue (LCF) regime, the fatigue life for thinner films is drastically reduced compared to thicker films. It is shown that fatigue coefficients in the LCF regime can be obtained when applying the Coffin–Manson relationship.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.030 ↗
2. 10.1073/pnas.040191810110.1073/pnas.0401918101 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0018525810.1007/BF00185258 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.112271610.1126/science.1122716 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.05710.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.057 ↗
6. 10.1021/cm049654n10.1021/cm049654n ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.080747610510.1073/pnas.0807476105 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0266665910.1007/BF02666659 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)00990-X10.1016/S0921-5093(01)00990-X ↗
10. 10.1063/1.164463410.1063/1.1644634 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.281723410.1063/1.2817234 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.009 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.272268410.1063/1.2722684 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-610.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-6 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.03.01210.1016/j.sna.2009.03.012 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.04110.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.041 ↗
17. 10.1016/0036-9748(84)90347-810.1016/0036-9748(84)90347-8 ↗
18. A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile metal
19. 10.1126/science.116837510.1126/science.1168375 ↗
20. Manson · 1954
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.06.09210.1016/j.msea.2007.06.092 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.10.00410.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.10.004 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.02710.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.027 ↗
24. 10.1038/nature0249810.1038/nature02498 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.01310.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.01010.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.010 ↗
27. Dieter · 1988
28. 10.1520/STP1315-EB10.1520/STP1315-EB ↗
29. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/19/19540410.1088/0022-3727/41/19/195404 ↗
30. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00391-910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00391-9 ↗
31. 10.1080/014186102100005669010.1080/0141861021000056690 ↗
32. 10.1557/jmr.2009.025210.1557/jmr.2009.0252 ↗
33. Suresh · 1999
34. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.03.04310.1016/j.msea.2013.03.043 ↗
35. 10.1002/smll.20120067410.1002/smll.201200674 ↗
36. 10.1039/c2ee21674d10.1039/c2ee21674d ↗
37. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-14540910.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145409 ↗