journal article·2007-09

Deformation micromechanisms of ZnO single crystals as determined from spherical nanoindentation stress–strain curves

Sandip Basu, Michel W. Barsoum

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 22· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, instrumented nanoindentation experiments with two spherical tips with radii of 13.5 and 1 μm were used to explore the deformation behavior of ZnO single crystals with two orientations, C (basal) and A (prism). By converting the nanoindentation load–displacement data to stress–strain curves, we show that the main reason the hardening rates are higher for the C plane than they are for the A plane is the activation of dislocations—with widely different flow stresses—on different sets of slip planes. For the former, glide occurs on basal planes as well as pyramidal planes; for the latter, glide occurs predominantly on basal planes. The C plane is roughly twice as hard as the A plane, probably due to the orientation of basal planes with respect to the indentation axis. A Weibull statistical analysis of the pop-in stresses indicates that the inherent defect concentration at or near the surface is the main factor for the initiation of plastic deformation. The strain energy released when the pop-ins occur determines their extent. The elastic moduli values, determined by Berkovich nanoindentation, are 135 ± 3 GPa and 144 ± 4 GPa for the C and A planes, respectively. In the C orientation repeated indentations to the same stress result in fully reversible hysteretic loops that are attributed to the formation of incipient kink bands.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.38010.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.380 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.25550810.1103/PhysRevLett.92.255508 ↗
3. 10.1557/JMR.2004.014810.1557/JMR.2004.0148 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.192987410.1063/1.1929874 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00214-810.1016/S1359-6462(03)00214-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.03510.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.035 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.199266610.1063/1.1992666 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.148626410.1063/1.1486264 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.09010.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.090 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07448-010.1016/S0043-1648(96)07448-0 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.144817510.1063/1.1448175 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.32434110.1063/1.324341 ↗
13. Coleman · 2007 · 0957-K07-17
14. 10.1063/1.217997410.1063/1.2179974 ↗
15. 10.1557/jmr.2006.032410.1557/jmr.2006.0324 ↗
16. 10.1017/CBO978113917173110.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01439-010.1016/S0040-6090(01)01439-0 ↗
18. 10.1557/JMR.1995.010110.1557/JMR.1995.0101 ↗
19. Tabor · 1951
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.13410110.1103/PhysRevB.71.134101 ↗
21. 20 Basu S. , Barsoum M.W. , Williams A.D. Moustakas T.D. : Spherical nanoindentation and deformation mechanisms in free-standing GaN films. J. App. Phys.,101, 083522-1 200710.1063/1.2719016 ↗
22. 21 Frank F.C. Stroh A.N. On the theory of kinking. Proc. Phys. Soc., 65, 811 195210.1088/0370-1301/65/10/311 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.233855210.1063/1.2338552 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00091-010.1016/S1359-6454(03)00091-0 ↗
25. 10.1038/nmat81410.1038/nmat814 ↗