Deformation micromechanisms of ZnO single crystals as determined from spherical nanoindentation stress–strain curves
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, instrumented nanoindentation experiments with two spherical tips with radii of 13.5 and 1 μm were used to explore the deformation behavior of ZnO single crystals with two orientations, C (basal) and A (prism). By converting the nanoindentation load–displacement data to stress–strain curves, we show that the main reason the hardening rates are higher for the C plane than they are for the A plane is the activation of dislocations—with widely different flow stresses—on different sets of slip planes. For the former, glide occurs on basal planes as well as pyramidal planes; for the latter, glide occurs predominantly on basal planes. The C plane is roughly twice as hard as the A plane, probably due to the orientation of basal planes with respect to the indentation axis. A Weibull statistical analysis of the pop-in stresses indicates that the inherent defect concentration at or near the surface is the main factor for the initiation of plastic deformation. The strain energy released when the pop-ins occur determines their extent. The elastic moduli values, determined by Berkovich nanoindentation, are 135 ± 3 GPa and 144 ± 4 GPa for the C and A planes, respectively. In the C orientation repeated indentations to the same stress result in fully reversible hysteretic loops that are attributed to the formation of incipient kink bands.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.38010.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.380 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.25550810.1103/PhysRevLett.92.255508 ↗
3. 10.1557/JMR.2004.014810.1557/JMR.2004.0148 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.192987410.1063/1.1929874 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00214-810.1016/S1359-6462(03)00214-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.03510.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.035 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.199266610.1063/1.1992666 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.148626410.1063/1.1486264 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.09010.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.090 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07448-010.1016/S0043-1648(96)07448-0 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.144817510.1063/1.1448175 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.32434110.1063/1.324341 ↗
13. Coleman · 2007 · 0957-K07-17
14. 10.1063/1.217997410.1063/1.2179974 ↗
15. 10.1557/jmr.2006.032410.1557/jmr.2006.0324 ↗
16. 10.1017/CBO978113917173110.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01439-010.1016/S0040-6090(01)01439-0 ↗
18. 10.1557/JMR.1995.010110.1557/JMR.1995.0101 ↗
19. Tabor · 1951
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.13410110.1103/PhysRevB.71.134101 ↗
21. 20 Basu S. , Barsoum M.W. , Williams A.D. Moustakas T.D. : Spherical nanoindentation and deformation mechanisms in free-standing GaN films. J. App. Phys.,101, 083522-1 200710.1063/1.2719016 ↗
22. 21 Frank F.C. Stroh A.N. On the theory of kinking. Proc. Phys. Soc., 65, 811 195210.1088/0370-1301/65/10/311 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.233855210.1063/1.2338552 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00091-010.1016/S1359-6454(03)00091-0 ↗
25. 10.1038/nmat81410.1038/nmat814 ↗