journal article·2018-05-28

Nanoindentation of high-purity vapor deposited lithium films: A mechanistic rationalization of diffusion-mediated flow

Erik G. Herbert, Stephen A. Hackney, Violet Thole, Nancy J. Dudney, P. Sudharshan Phani

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 33· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanoindentation experiments performed in 5 and 18 μm thick vapor deposited polycrystalline lithium films at 31 °C reveal the mean pressure lithium can support is strongly dependent on length scale and strain rate. At the smallest length scales (indentation depths of 40 nm), the mean pressure lithium can support increases from ∼23 to 175 MPa as the indentation strain rate increases from 0.195 to 1.364 s−1. Furthermore, these pressures are ∼46–350 times higher than the nominal yield strength of bulk polycrystalline lithium. The length scale and strain rate dependent hardness is rationalized using slightly modified forms of the Nabarro–Herring and Harper–Dorn creep mechanisms. Load-displacement curves suggest a stress and length-scale dependent transition from diffusion to dislocation-mediated flow. Collectively, these experimental observations shed significant new light on the mechanical behavior of lithium at the length scale of defects existing at the lithium/solid electrolyte interface.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.169968110.1063/1.1699681 ↗
2. Tabor · 1951
3. 10.1073/pnas.161573311410.1073/pnas.1615733114 ↗
4. Nabarro · 1948 · 75
5. 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-010.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0 ↗
6. 10.1557/JMR.1995.202410.1557/JMR.1995.2024 ↗
7. Hirth · 1982
8. 10.1557/PROC-239-32510.1557/PROC-239-325 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.16550210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.165502 ↗
10. 10.1115/1.364402010.1115/1.3644020 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.362519210.1115/1.3625192 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.01810.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.018 ↗
13. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
14. 10.1557/jmr.2018.8510.1557/jmr.2018.85 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0385410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03854 ↗
16. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.2.51310.1557/jmr.2004.19.2.513 ↗
17. 10.2172/80418010.2172/804180 ↗
18. 10.1557/jmr.2018.8310.1557/jmr.2018.83 ↗
19. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
20. Lucas · 1997
21. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01120-410.1016/S1359-6462(01)01120-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
23. Creep and hardness of metals: A physical study
24. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.09.00910.1016/j.jmps.2012.09.009 ↗
25. 10.1080/0141861970821421710.1080/01418619708214217 ↗
26. 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90119-D10.1016/0956-7151(93)90119-D ↗
27. 10.2320/matertrans.46.195110.2320/matertrans.46.1951 ↗
28. 10.1016/0001-6160(57)90112-810.1016/0001-6160(57)90112-8 ↗
29. 10.1002/978047038075810.1002/9780470380758 ↗
30. 10.1002/pssb.1970038020610.1002/pssb.19700380206 ↗
31. Porter · 2009
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R1605710.1103/PhysRevB.55.R16057 ↗
33. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-10445610.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104456 ↗
34. 10.1098/rspa.1993.005010.1098/rspa.1993.0050 ↗