journal article·2013-07-14

Characterizing interface dislocations by atomically informed Frank-Bilby theory

Jian Wang, Ruifeng Zhang, Caizhi Zhou, Irene J. Beyerlein, Amit Misra

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 28· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Semicoherent interfaces containing discrete dislocations are more energetically favorable than those containing continuous distributions because of lower chemical energy. The classical Frank-Bilby theory provided a way to determine the interface Burgers vectors content but could not effectively predict the characteristics of discrete dislocations. Atomistic simulations provide insights into analyzing the characteristics of discrete dislocations but the analysis is often disturbed by the reaction of interface dislocations. By combining the classical Frank-Bilby theory and atomistic simulations, an atomically informed Frank-Bilby theory proposed in this work can overcome shortcomings in both the classic Frank-Bilby theory and atomistic simulations, and enable quantitative analysis of interface dislocations. The proposed method has been demonstrated via studying two typical dissimilar metallic interfaces. The results showed that Burgers vectors of interface dislocations can be well defined in a Commensurate/Coherent Dichromatic Pattern (CDP) and the Rotation CDP (RCDP) lattices. Most importantly, the CDP and RCDP lattices are not simply a geometric average of the two natural lattices, that is the lattice misfit and the relative twist take the nonequal partition of the misfit strain and the twist angle.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.02710.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.027 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-3-642-49173-310.1007/978-3-642-49173-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.05610.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.056 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.09.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.09.022 ↗
5. New aspects of martensitic transformation
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.13610210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136102 ↗
7. 10.1016/0036-9748(76)90180-010.1016/0036-9748(76)90180-0 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11837-012-0431-010.1007/s11837-012-0431-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.00310.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.003 ↗
10. 10.1016/0025-5416(82)90040-410.1016/0025-5416(82)90040-4 ↗
11. Pond · 1994 · 47 · 287
12. 10.1557/jmr.2008.012010.1557/jmr.2008.0120 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cossms.2010.09.00210.1016/j.cossms.2010.09.002 ↗
14. Demkowicz · 2008 · 14 · 141
15. 10.1557/jmr.2012.10610.1557/jmr.2012.106 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.06410610.1103/PhysRevB.83.064106 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.05010.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.050 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.475578910.1063/1.4755789 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.09.00810.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.09.008 ↗
20. Frank · 1950 · 150
21. Bilby · 1955 · 124
22. 10.1080/1478643670822974810.1080/14786436708229748 ↗
23. 10.1080/1478643670822974910.1080/14786436708229749 ↗
24. Hirth · 1982
25. Sutton · 1995
26. 10.1016/0001-6160(78)90207-910.1016/0001-6160(78)90207-9 ↗
27. Forwood · 1991
28. Goodhew · 1980 · 155
29. 10.1063/1.369301510.1063/1.3693015 ↗
30. 10.1080/0141861820823694310.1080/01418618208236943 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00338-410.1016/S1359-6454(00)00338-4 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.04110.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.041 ↗
33. 10.1557/JMR.1989.119510.1557/JMR.1989.1195 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.00810.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.008 ↗
35. 10.1142/S175882510900021610.1142/S1758825109000216 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.220476010.1063/1.2204760 ↗
37. 10.1021/nl051842510.1021/nl0518425 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.91310.1103/PhysRevB.61.913 ↗
39. 10.1080/1478643620821329010.1080/14786436208213290 ↗
40. 10.1007/s11837-012-0429-710.1007/s11837-012-0429-7 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.367544710.1063/1.3675447 ↗
42. Interface defects, reference spaces and the Frank-Bilby equation