Importance of surface preparation on the nano-indentation stress-strain curves measured in metals
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, we investigated experimentally the various factors influencing the extraction of indentation stress-strain curves from spherical nanoindentation on metal samples using two different tip radii. In particular, we focused on the effects of (i) the surface preparation techniques used, (ii) the presence of a surface oxide layer, and (iii) the occurrence of pop-ins at the elastic-plastic transition on our newly developed data analysis methods for extracting reliable indentation stress-strain curves. Rough mechanical polishing was shown to introduce a large scatter in the measured indentation yield strengths, whereas electropolishing or vibropolishing produced consistent results reflective of the pristine sample. The data analysis techniques used were able to discard the portions of the raw data affected by a thin oxide layer, present on most metal surfaces, and yield reasonable indentation stress-strain curves. Experiments with different indenter tip radii on annealed and cold-worked samples indicated that pop-ins are caused by delayed nucleation of dislocations in the sample under the indenter.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.259.5103.188310.1126/science.259.5103.1883 ↗
2. 10.1557/JMR.2004.027610.1557/JMR.2004.0276 ↗
3. 10.1557/JMR.1992.045010.1557/JMR.1992.0450 ↗
4. 16. Michler J. , Stauss S. , Schwaller P. , Bucaille J-L. , and Felder E. : Determining the stress-strain behavior at micro- and nanometer scales by coupling nanoindentation to numerical simulation. EMPA (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research) Publication 6 (2002).
5. 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71495-X10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71495-X ↗
6. 10.1063/1.11693910.1063/1.116939 ↗
7. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-710.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-7 ↗
8. Timoshenko · 1970
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.04550210.1103/PhysRevLett.98.045502 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00509-810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00509-8 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5943-310.1007/978-1-4757-5943-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00245-610.1016/S1359-6462(99)00245-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)00351-H10.1016/0956-7151(94)00351-H ↗
14. 10.1016/1359-6454(96)00010-910.1016/1359-6454(96)00010-9 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R1605710.1103/PhysRevB.55.R16057 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.165637610.1063/1.1656376 ↗
17. 10.1016/0022-3115(61)90002-210.1016/0022-3115(61)90002-2 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00024-X10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00024-X ↗
19. 21. Pathak S. , Stojakovic D. , and Kalidindi S.R. : Measurement of the local mechanical properties in polycrystalline samples using spherical nano-indentation and orientation imaging microscopy. Acta Mater. (2008, submitted).10.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.008 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.02.00910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.02.009 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.01910.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.019 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-110.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-1 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.06810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.068 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00249-710.1016/S0020-7683(97)00249-7 ↗
25. Elastic modulus and stress-strain response of human enamel by nano-indentation
26. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00725-410.1016/S0921-5093(98)00725-4 ↗
27. 10.1557/JMR.1995.010110.1557/JMR.1995.0101 ↗
28. 10.1557/JMR.2002.038610.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0042-207X(00)00377-810.1016/S0042-207X(00)00377-8 ↗
30. Tabor · 1951
31. 10.1557/JMR.1993.029710.1557/JMR.1993.0297 ↗
32. Hertz · 1896
33. Petzow · 1999
34. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00100-310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00100-3 ↗
35. 10.1002/adem.20050004910.1002/adem.200500049 ↗
36. Gerberich · 1995 · 629
37. 10.1557/JMR.2004.014810.1557/JMR.2004.0148 ↗
38. Handbook · 2004 · 9
39. 10.1557/JMR.1998.019910.1557/JMR.1998.0199 ↗
40. Mann · 1995 · 271
41. Stauss · 2003 · 818
42. Simmons · 1971
43. 10.1557/JMR.1993.129110.1557/JMR.1993.1291 ↗
44. 10.1557/JMR.1995.216210.1557/JMR.1995.2162 ↗
45. Pethica · 1987 · 61
46. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00436-110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00436-1 ↗
47. 10.1557/JMR.1995.149110.1557/JMR.1995.1491 ↗
48. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00009-410.1016/S1359-6454(00)00009-4 ↗
49. Bahr · 1998 · 83
50. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.03610.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.036 ↗
51. 10.1557/JMR.1993.068510.1557/JMR.1993.0685 ↗
52. 10.1016/0039-6028(79)90606-X10.1016/0039-6028(79)90606-X ↗
53. 10.1093/qmath/os-10.1.16110.1093/qmath/os-10.1.161 ↗
54. Courtney · 1999
55. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.12630010.1063/1.126300 ↗
57. Shear strength of ceramics10.1023/B:JMSC.0000016212.61341.52 ↗
58. 10.1557/jmr.2006.032410.1557/jmr.2006.0324 ↗
59. 10.1016/0040-6090(88)90391-410.1016/0040-6090(88)90391-4 ↗
60. 10.1557/JMR.1997.043910.1557/JMR.1997.0439 ↗
61. 10.1080/0569819780898285610.1080/05698197808982856 ↗
62. Kelly · 1986 · 423
63. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00303-810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00303-8 ↗
64. 10.1080/0141861930822475610.1080/01418619308224756 ↗
65. 10.1038/nmat81410.1038/nmat814 ↗
66. 36. Smithells Metals Reference Book, 8th ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2004).
67. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00270-X10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00270-X ↗
68. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00025-310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00025-3 ↗
69. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.331910.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3319 ↗
70. 10.1080/0141861970821421710.1080/01418619708214217 ↗
71. Mann · 1997 · 153
72. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.02.01010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.02.010 ↗
73. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗