journal article·2004-11-01

Analysis of sharp-tip-indentation load–depth curve for contact area determination taking into account pile-up and sink-in effects

Yeol Choi, Ho-Seung Lee, Dongil Kwon

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 19· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Hardness and elastic modulus of micromaterials can be evaluated by analyzing instrumented sharp-tip-indentation load–depth curves. The present study quantified the effects of tip-blunting and pile-up or sink-in on the contact area by analyzing indentation curves. Finite-element simulation and theoretical modeling were used to describe the detailed contact morphologies. The ratio f of contact depth, i.e., the depth including elastic deflection and pile-up and sink-in, to maximum indentation depth, i.e., the depth measured only by depth sensing, ignoring elastic deflection and pile-up and sink-in, was proposed as a key indentation parameter in evaluating real contact depth during indentation. This ratio can be determined strictly in terms of indentation-curve parameters, such as loading and unloading slopes at maximum depth and the ratio of elastic indentation energy to total indentation energy. In addition, the value of f was found to be independent of indentation depth, and furthermore the real contact area can be determined and hardness and elastic modulus can be evaluated from f. This curve-analysis method was verified in finite-element simulations and nanoindentation experiments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/JMR.2002.007010.1557/JMR.2002.0070 ↗
2. Using the ratio of loading slope and elastic stiffness to predict pileup and constraint factor during indentation
3. 10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00645-X10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00645-X ↗
4. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-110.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-1 ↗
5. Meyers · 1999 · 61
6. 10.1080/0141861020823570110.1080/01418610208235701 ↗
7. 10.1557/JMR.2001.042610.1557/JMR.2001.0426 ↗
8. 10.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-810.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-8 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.12187310.1063/1.121873 ↗
10. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00031-110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00031-1 ↗
12. Loubet · Vickers indentation curves of elastoplastic materials, · 1986 · 72
13. 10.1557/JMR.2002.038610.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
14. 10.1080/0141861020823570010.1080/01418610208235700 ↗
15. 10.1557/JMR.1999.004210.1557/JMR.1999.0042 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01176-910.1016/S1359-6462(01)01176-9 ↗
17. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
18. 10.1557/JMR.1999.030610.1557/JMR.1999.0306 ↗
19. 10.1557/JMR.1996.025010.1557/JMR.1996.0250 ↗
20. 10.1557/JMR.1998.014610.1557/JMR.1998.0146 ↗
21. 10.1557/JMR.1998.018510.1557/JMR.1998.0185 ↗
22. 10.1080/0141861020823569310.1080/01418610208235693 ↗
23. 10.1557/JMR.2002.014410.1557/JMR.2002.0144 ↗
24. 10.1080/09500839917669810.1080/095008399176698 ↗
25. 10.1557/JMR.1995.149110.1557/JMR.1995.1491 ↗