journal article·1995-11

An atomistic study of brittle fracture: Toward explicit failure criteria from atomistic modeling

Peter Gumbsch

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 10· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Atomistic techniques are used to study brittle fracture under opening mode and mixed mode loading conditions. The influence of the discreteness of the lattice and of the lattice-trapping effect on crack propagation is studied using an embedded atom potential for nickel to describe the crack tip. The recently developed FEAt (Finite Element-Atomistic) coupling scheme provides the atomistic core region with realistic boundary conditions. Several crystallographically distinct crack-tip configurations are studied and commonly reveal that brittle cracks under general mixed mode loading situations follow an energy criterion (G-criterion) rather than an opening-stress criterion (Kl-criterion). However, if there are two competing failure modes, they seem to unload each other, which leads to an increase in lattice trapping. Blunted crack tips are studied in the last part of the paper and are compared to the atomically sharp cracks. Depending on the shape of the blunted crack tip, the observed failure modes differ significantly and can drastically disagree with what one would anticipate from a continuum mechanical analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0920-2307(93)90001-U10.1016/0920-2307(93)90001-U ↗
2. 10.1080/0950083910821465410.1080/09500839108214654 ↗
3. 10.1080/1478643750822654410.1080/14786437508226544 ↗
4. Thomson · 1986 · 39 · 1
5. 10.1063/1.35775910.1063/1.357759 ↗
6. 21 Gumbsch P. and Beltz G.E. , unpublished.
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.166069910.1063/1.1660699 ↗
9. 10.1557/JMR.1991.256510.1557/JMR.1991.2565 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.27210.1103/PhysRevLett.73.272 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-1-4613-3500-9_5110.1007/978-1-4613-3500-9_51 ↗
12. Fuller · Fracture 1977 · 1977 · 3 · 387
13. 10.1017/CBO978051162312710.1017/CBO9780511623127 ↗
14. Sill · 1968 · 2 · 67
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.1061310.1103/PhysRevB.46.10613 ↗
16. Rice · 1968 · 2 · 191
17. 10.1098/rspa.1972.010210.1098/rspa.1972.0102 ↗
18. 10.1080/0141861820823693010.1080/01418618208236930 ↗
19. 10.1080/0141861910821395310.1080/01418619108213953 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.34873510.1063/1.348735 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.771010.1103/PhysRevB.47.7710 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.85210.1103/PhysRevLett.72.852 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-210.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
24. 10.1080/0141861910820459610.1080/01418619108204596 ↗
25. 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(94)90013-2 ↗
26. 10.1016/0020-7683(67)90049-210.1016/0020-7683(67)90049-2 ↗
27. Baskes · 1990
28. 10.1007/BF0003268210.1007/BF00032682 ↗
29. 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90018-310.1016/0022-5096(94)90018-3 ↗
30. 10.1016/0001-6160(85)90121-X10.1016/0001-6160(85)90121-X ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.280410.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2804 ↗