journal article·2022-08-28

Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of SLM-printed Ti–6Al–4V alloy: Effect of build orientation

H. Eskandari, H. R. Lashgari, Sh. Zangeneh, C. Kong, L. Ye, M. Eizadjou, H. Wang

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 37· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Manufacturing parameters play a significant role on the final quality and mechanical integrity of the structural components manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM) method. Among these parameters, the build orientation is quite crucial since it determines not only the manufacturing time and total cost of a 3D-printed part but also the mechanical strength with respect to loading axis. For this reason, this study is aimed at investigating the effect of build orientation (vertical vs. horizontal) on the microstructure, tensile strength, and wear properties of Ti–6Al–4V alloy manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM) method. The acicular(alphaprime)martensite was the dominant phase in SLMed samples; however, the size of needles was finer in the vertically printed samples as compared to the horizontally printed ones. Grain boundary map revealed that the fraction of high-angle grain boundary (HAGBs) was dominant in the as-printed state whereas low-angle grain boundary (LAGBs) was dominant in the wrought alloy. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the horizontally and vertically printed samples was ≈ 27% and 15% higher than that of wrought alloy while the ductility is almost one-third of the commercial alloy and quite close to the minimum requirement of ASTM F1108 for surgical implants. The dry sliding pin-on-disc showed that the wear resistance of the as-printed alloy irrespective of build orientation was inferior when compared to the wrought alloy.Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. C. Suryanarayana, F.H. Froes, R.G. Rowe, Rapid solidification processing of titanium alloys. Int. Mater. Rev. 36(1), 85–123 (2013)10.1179/imr.1991.36.1.85 ↗
2. J.A. Chafino et al., The influence of temperature during water-quench rapid heat treatment on the microstructure, mechanical properties and biocompatibility of Ti6Al4V ELI alloy. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 96, 144–151 (2019)10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.024 ↗
3. M.K. McQuillan, Phase transformations in titanium and its alloys. Metall. Rev. 8(1), 41–104 (2013)
4. R.L. Preece, K.W.J. Bowen, Applications and Uses of Titanium and Its Alloys. Metall. Rev. 6(1), 241–278 (2013)10.1179/095066061790425929 ↗
5. S. Liu, Y.C. Shin, Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy: A review. Mater. Design 164, 107552 (2019)10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552 ↗
6. M. Simonelli, Y.Y. Tse, C. Tuck, The formation of α + β microstructure in as-fabricated selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V. J. Mater. Res. 29(17), 2028–2035 (2014)10.1557/jmr.2014.166 ↗
7. S. Gorsse et al., Additive manufacturing of metals: a brief review of the characteristic microstructures and properties of steels, Ti–6Al–4V and high-entropy alloys. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 18(1), 584–610 (2017)10.1080/14686996.2017.1361305 ↗
8. Z.C. Xu, H.P. Kriegel, The martensitic transformation in Ti–6Al–4V. Mater. Sci. Forum 914, 140–148 (2018)10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.914.140 ↗
9. J. Liu, et al., Achieving Ti6Al4V alloys with both high strength and ductility via selective laser melting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 766, 138319 (2019)10.1016/j.msea.2019.138319 ↗
10. Y. Xu, et al., Microstructural tailoring of as-selective laser melted Ti6Al4V alloy for high mechanical properties. J. Alloys Compd. 816, 152 (2020)10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152536 ↗
11. W. Xu et al., In situ tailoring microstructure in additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V for superior mechanical performance. Acta Mater. 125, 390–400 (2017)10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.027 ↗
12. A.K. Singla et al., Selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V alloy: Process parameters, defects and post-treatments. J. Manuf. Process. 64, 161–187 (2021)10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.01.009 ↗
13. I. Hacısalihoğlu, F. Yıldiz, A. Çelik, The effects of build orientation and hatch spacing on mechanical properties of medical Ti–6Al–4V alloy manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 802, 140649 (2021)10.1016/j.msea.2020.140649 ↗
14. M. Tarik Hasib, et al., Fatigue crack growth behavior of laser powder bed fusion additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V: Roles of post heat treatment and build orientation. Int. J. Fatigue 142, 105955 (2021)10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105955 ↗
15. T. Kozior, J. Bochnia, The influence of printing orientation on surface texture parameters in powder bed fusion technology with 316L steel. Micromachines (Basel) 11(7) (2020)10.3390/mi11070639 ↗
16. A. Charles, et al., Effect of process parameters on the generated surface roughness of down-facing surfaces in selective laser melting. Appl. Sci. 9(6) (2019)10.3390/app9061256 ↗
17. T. Rautio et al., Laser welding of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V: Microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater. Today 28, 907–911 (2020)
18. A. Yadollahi et al., Effects of building orientation and heat treatment on fatigue behavior of selective laser melted 17–4 PH stainless steel. Int. J. Fatigue 94, 218–235 (2017)10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.014 ↗
19. J. Yang et al., Formation and control of martensite in Ti–6Al–4V alloy produced by selective laser melting. Mater. Des. 108, 308–318 (2016)10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.117 ↗
20. M. Motyka, Martensite formation and decomposition during traditional and AM processing of two-phase titanium alloys—An overview. Metals 11(3) (2021)10.3390/met11030481 ↗
21. A. Moridi, et al., Deformation and failure mechanisms of Ti–6Al–4V as built by selective laser melting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 768 (2019).10.1016/j.msea.2019.138456 ↗
22. Z. Fan, H. Feng, Study on selective laser melting and heat treatment of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Results Phys. 10, 660–664 (2018)10.1016/j.rinp.2018.07.008 ↗
23. H. Li et al., Tribological performance of selective laser melted 316L stainless steel. Tribol. Int. 128, 121–129 (2018)10.1016/j.triboint.2018.07.021 ↗
24. F. Bartolomeu et al., Wear behavior of Ti6Al4V biomedical alloys processed by selective laser melting, hot pressing and conventional casting. Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China 27(4), 829–838 (2017)10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60060-8 ↗
25. Y. Yang et al., Wear anisotropy of selective laser melted 316L stainless steel. Wear 428–429, 376–386 (2019)10.1016/j.wear.2019.04.001 ↗
26. G. Straffelini, Dry sliding wear of Ti–6Al–4V alloy as influenced by the counterface and sliding conditions. Wear 236(1–2), 328–338 (1999)10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00292-6 ↗
27. G.W. Batchelor, Engineering Tribology (Fourth Edition). Butterworth-Heinemann (2014)
28. G.E. Totten, ASM HANDBOOK Friction, Lubrication, and Wear Technology (2017)10.31399/asm.hb.v18.9781627081924 ↗
29. X.H. Cui et al., Wear characteristics of Ti–6Al–4V alloy at 20–400°C. Tribol. Trans. 55(2), 185–190 (2012)10.1080/10402004.2011.647387 ↗