Resistance degradation behavior of Ca-doped BaTiO3
Source abstract
Abstract
Resistance degradation of Ca-doped BaTiO3ceramics was investigated. A series of coarse and fine-grained (Ba1–xCax)TiO3with only Ba site incorporation rangingxfrom 0 to 0.1, and Ba(Ti1–yCay)O3ceramics with only Ti site incorporation rangingyfrom 0 to 0.015, were prepared with similar grain sizes. The increase ofxdid not cause any distinct difference in degradation, whereas an increase inycaused a significant resistance degradation in both coarse and fine-grained specimens. The variation of ionic transference number (tion) as evaluated by the Warburg impedance was negligible with increase inx, but significantly increased with the increase iny. These results demonstrate that the decrease of lattice parameters and lattice shrinkage by the Ba site incorporation of Ca has little influence on the resistance degradation, and that the oxygen vacancy concentration generated by the Ti site incorporation of acceptor Ca is a very important factor that governs resistance degradation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00442-410.1016/S1359-6454(97)00442-4 ↗
2. Cullity · 2001
3. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb07706.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb07706.x ↗
4. 10.2109/jcersj.109.S210.2109/jcersj.109.S2 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03305.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03305.x ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04936.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04936.x ↗
7. 10.1063/1.161530010.1063/1.1615300 ↗
8. 10.1143/JJAP.46.298410.1143/JJAP.46.2984 ↗
9. 10.1023/A:101221882673310.1023/A:1012218826733 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.285747510.1063/1.2857475 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00949.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00949.x ↗
12. 10.1063/1.34666510.1063/1.346665 ↗
13. 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00043-T10.1016/0955-2219(95)00043-T ↗
14. 10.1143/JJAP.42.110.1143/JJAP.42.1 ↗
15. 10.1016/0025-5408(87)90296-010.1016/0025-5408(87)90296-0 ↗
16. 10.1143/JJAP.41.646110.1143/JJAP.41.6461 ↗
17. 10.1143/JJAP.48.05140410.1143/JJAP.48.051404 ↗
18. 10.1039/b100180i10.1039/b100180i ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03121.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03121.x ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb07055.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb07055.x ↗
21. 10.1023/A:100999833168810.1023/A:1009998331688 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb09810.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb09810.x ↗
23. 10.1143/JJAP.38.545210.1143/JJAP.38.5452 ↗
24. 10.1143/JJAP.41.692210.1143/JJAP.41.6922 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03122.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03122.x ↗
26. 10.1557/jmr.2007.032610.1557/jmr.2007.0326 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRev.124.135410.1103/PhysRev.124.1354 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.277711910.1063/1.2777119 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb09809.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb09809.x ↗
30. 10.1149/1.139261110.1149/1.1392611 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0239692510.1007/BF02396925 ↗
32. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00367-510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00367-5 ↗
33. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03202.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03202.x ↗
34. 10.1143/JJAP.41.566810.1143/JJAP.41.5668 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01499.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01499.x ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRev.151.37810.1103/PhysRev.151.378 ↗
37. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04937.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04937.x ↗
38. 10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00082-610.1016/S0955-2219(01)00082-6 ↗
39. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb09811.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb09811.x ↗
40. 10.1063/1.180926810.1063/1.1809268 ↗
41. Correlation between resistance degradation and thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) in acceptor (Mg)-doped BaTiO3 sub-micron fine-grain ceramics.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03647.x ↗
42. 10.1063/1.33605110.1063/1.336051 ↗