journal article·2020-02-14

Tuning surface texture of electrospun polycaprolactone fibers: Effects of solvent systems and relative humidity

Murat Şimşek

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 35· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the surface morphology of electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) fibers was investigated. PCL was dissolved in various solvent/nonsolvent systems (acetone/dimethylformamide (DMF), tetrahydrofuran (THF)/DMF, dichloromethane (DCM)/DMF, chloroform (CF)/DMF, acetone/dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), THF/DMSO, DCM/DMSO, CF/DMSO) at a fixed ratio of 80/20 v/v. PCL solutions from these solvent systems were electrospun under varying high relative humidity (60–90%), and also room humidity. Characterization of fibers was evaluated by a scanning electron microscope, an atomic force microscope, water contact angle measurements, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, and a strain–stress test. Results revealed that the surface texture of individual fibers changed with the presence of different types of pores and surface roughness depending on both humidity and solvent/nonsolvent properties. Miscibility with water was another factor to be taken into account for understanding mechanisms that contributed to the formation of surface defects. Fibrous materials having such a surface architecture, especially the porous ones, are potential candidates for various applications such as tissue engineering, drug delivery, catalysis, and filtration.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Silk-based biomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/la400747y10.1021/la400747y ↗
2. 10.1021/ma020444a10.1021/ma020444a ↗
3. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.06910.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.069 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41598-017-00181-010.1038/s41598-017-00181-0 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.105788710.1126/science.1057887 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.07.04510.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.07.045 ↗
7. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/17/02210.1088/0957-4484/17/17/022 ↗
8. 10.1002/polb.2409010.1002/polb.24090 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.10.07310.1016/j.polymer.2014.10.073 ↗
10. 10.1002/jbm.a.1043810.1002/jbm.a.10438 ↗
11. 10.1039/C5TA09166G10.1039/C5TA09166G ↗
12. Poly(ε-caprolactone) fiber: An overview
13. 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.10.05910.1016/j.matlet.2008.10.059 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.011 ↗
15. 10.3390/membranes703004510.3390/membranes7030045 ↗
16. 10.1021/ma035197510.1021/ma0351975 ↗
17. 10.1139/v08-02910.1139/v08-029 ↗
18. 10.1002/marc.20050002310.1002/marc.200500023 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7 ↗
20. 10.1089/ten.tec.2012.067110.1089/ten.tec.2012.0671 ↗
21. 10.1021/am900736h10.1021/am900736h ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.09.01210.1016/j.polymer.2014.09.012 ↗
23. Porous electrospun fibers with self-sealing functionality: An enabling strategy for trapping
24. 10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/03400210.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034002 ↗
25. Surface topography of polylactic acid nanofibrous mats: Influence on blood compatibility
26. 10.1155/2011/29251610.1155/2011/292516 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0269610.1021/acs.macromol.6b02696 ↗
28. 10.1007/s12221-015-5426-310.1007/s12221-015-5426-3 ↗
29. 10.2174/13816120677902632610.2174/138161206779026326 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.01.02810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.01.028 ↗
31. 10.1177/088532821246225710.1177/0885328212462257 ↗
32. 10.1039/C5RA15841A10.1039/C5RA15841A ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.02710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.027 ↗