Optimization of mechanical properties and electrical conductivity in Al–Mg–Si 6201 alloys with different Mg/Si ratios
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of the Mg/Si ratio and aging treatment on the strength and electrical conductivity of Al–Mg–Si 6201 conductor alloys were investigated. Four experimental alloys with different Mg/Si ratios of 2, 1.5, 1, and 0.86 and with a constant Mg level of 0.65 wt% were prepared. It was revealed that excessive Si (a low Mg/Si ratio) increased the peak strength, while the corresponding electrical conductivity decreased. To fulfill the minimum required electrical conductivity (52.5% IACS), the alloys with low Mg/Si ratios required a longer aging time after peak aging to improve electrical conductivity. The alloy with an Mg/Si ratio of ~1 was the best candidate, exhibiting the highest strength up to 54% IACS. On the high end of electrical conductivity (54–56% IACS), the alloy with an Mg/Si ratio of ~1.5 provides a better compromise between strength and electrical conductivity. Furthermore, the strengthening mechanisms and the factors influencing electrical conductivity were discussed for further optimization.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Influence of natural aging and cold deformation on the mechanical and electrical properties of 6201-T81 aluminum alloy wires
2. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.12.00210.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.12.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.03910.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.039 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.08610.1016/j.msea.2014.12.086 ↗
5. 10.1080/14786435.2011.59357710.1080/14786435.2011.593577 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.05.05510.1016/j.msea.2018.05.055 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.013 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.05110.1016/j.msea.2012.09.051 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.00310.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.003 ↗
10. 25. EN 50183 Standard. Conductors for overhead lines, aluminium magnesium silicon alloy wires (2000).
11. 10.1007/s10853-016-0691-010.1007/s10853-016-0691-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.07.01110.1016/j.matchar.2016.07.011 ↗
13. 10.1080/1478643070128737710.1080/14786430701287377 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.06.00410.1016/j.matdes.2007.06.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.03.01110.1016/j.jmst.2019.03.011 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11665-016-2373-010.1007/s11665-016-2373-0 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.00610.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.006 ↗
18. 10.1557/jmr.2017.5610.1557/jmr.2017.56 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.06.00510.1016/j.matdes.2005.06.005 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01247-310.1016/S0921-5093(01)01247-3 ↗
21. Development of high-strength and high-electrical-conductivity aluminum alloys for power transmission conductors
22. 10.1007/s10973-015-4915-310.1007/s10973-015-4915-3 ↗
23. The influence of alloy composition on precipitates of the Al–Mg–Si system
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.06510.1016/j.msea.2017.10.065 ↗
25. Iraizoz · 2016 · 183
26. Totten · 2003
27. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00293-610.1016/S1359-6454(98)00293-6 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.04210.1016/j.msea.2006.01.042 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.11010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.110 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.13310.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.133 ↗
31. 26. ASTM. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Electrical Conductors (2002).
32. 10.1080/02670836.2016.125815610.1080/02670836.2016.1258156 ↗
33. 10.1126/science.112419910.1126/science.1124199 ↗
34. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00059-710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00059-7 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.11.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.11.030 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.11910.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.119 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.06610.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.066 ↗