journal article·2012-01-14Open access

Quantifying plasticity-independent creep compliance and relaxation of viscoelastoplastic materials under contact loading

Matthieu Vandamme, Catherine A. Tweedie, Georgios Constantinides, Franz-Josef Ulm, Krystyn J. Van Vliet

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 27· Issue 1

Abstract

Here we quantify the time-dependent mechanical properties of a linear viscoelastoplastic material under contact loading. For contact load relaxation, we showed that the relaxation modulus can be measured independently of concurrent plasticity exhibited during the loading phase. For indentation creep, we showed that the rate of change of the contact creep compliance(dot L(t))can be measured independently of any plastic deformation exhibited during loading through(dot L(t) = 2a(t)dot h(t)/Pmax ), wherea(t) is the contact radius,h(t) is the displacement of the contact probe, andPmaxis the constant applied load during the creep phase. These analytical relations were compared with numerical simulations of conical indentation creep for a viscoelastoplastic material and validated against sharp indentation creep experiments conducted on polystyrene. The derived relations enable extraction of viscoelastic material characteristics, even if sharp probes confer concurrent plasticity, applicable for a general axisymmetric contact probe geometry and a general time-independent plasticity.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3139/146.10148010.3139/146.101480 ↗
2. 10.1557/JMR.2003.002010.1557/JMR.2003.0020 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11340-006-5857-210.1007/s11340-006-5857-2 ↗
4. 10.1557/jmr.2006.007610.1557/jmr.2006.0076 ↗
5. 10.1557/JMR.2005.020010.1557/JMR.2005.0200 ↗
6. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
7. 10.1557/JMR.1999.055010.1557/JMR.1999.0550 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11043-009-9098-510.1007/s11043-009-9098-5 ↗
9. 10.1080/1478643060073547610.1080/14786430600735476 ↗
10. 10.1017/CBO978113917173110.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
11. 10.1557/JMR.1999.030610.1557/JMR.1999.0306 ↗
12. 10.1557/JMR.2004.030810.1557/JMR.2004.0308 ↗
13. 10.1557/jmr.2006.019710.1557/jmr.2006.0197 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.finel.2011.01.00810.1016/j.finel.2011.01.008 ↗
15. Ashby · 2004 · 58
16. 10.1557/jmr.2009.036510.1557/jmr.2009.0365 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mser.2004.05.00110.1016/j.mser.2004.05.001 ↗
18. Galin · 1953
19. 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.364402010.1115/1.3644020 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.04310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.043 ↗
22. Christensen · 1982
23. 10.1557/JMR.2002.038610.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
24. 10.1557/jmr.2006.039510.1557/jmr.2006.0395 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.07.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2005.07.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-710.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-7 ↗
27. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
28. Determination of Young’s modulus according to indentation diagram
29. 10.1557/jmr.2006.037710.1557/jmr.2006.0377 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.06.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.06.012 ↗