journal article·2014-08-28

Energy dissipation mechanisms in hollow metallic microlattices

Ladan Salari-Sharif, Tobias A. Schaedler, Lorenzo Valdevit

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 29· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

When properly designed at ultra-low density, hollow metallic microlattices can fully recover from compressive strains in excess of 50%, while dissipating a considerable portion of the elastic strain energy. This article investigates the physical mechanisms responsible for energy loss upon compressive cycling, and attributes the most significant contribution to a unique form of structural damping, whereby elastic local buckling of individual bars releases energy upon loading. Subsequently, a simple mechanical model is presented to capture the relationship between lattice geometry and structural damping. The model is used to optimize the microlattice geometry for maximum damping performance. The conclusions show that hollow metallic microlattices exhibit exceptionally large values of the damping figure of merit, (Young’s modulus)1/3(loss coefficient)/(density), but this performance requires very low relative densities (<1%), thus limiting the amount of energy that can be dissipated.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.481816810.1063/1.4818168 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.10.01510.1016/j.jmps.2013.10.015 ↗
3. 2010
4. The relationship of traditional damping measures for materials with high damping capacity: A review
5. 10.1007/s11340-014-9917-810.1007/s11340-014-9917-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.07310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.073 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11661-998-0221-z10.1007/s11661-998-0221-z ↗
8. 10.1126/science.121164910.1126/science.1211649 ↗
9. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/08401310.1088/0964-1726/22/8/084013 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0263-8231(01)00006-410.1016/S0263-8231(01)00006-4 ↗
11. 10.1002/adem.20130020610.1002/adem.201300206 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00266-510.1016/S0266-3538(03)00266-5 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl401308v10.1021/nl401308v ↗
14. Lazan · 1968
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.07910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.079 ↗
16. 10.1557/jmr.2013.16010.1557/jmr.2013.160 ↗
17. 10.1017/CBO978051162427810.1017/CBO9780511624278 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.002 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.11.00910.1016/j.mechmat.2011.11.009 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cma.2012.03.01810.1016/j.cma.2012.03.018 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.03.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.03.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00315-210.1016/S0020-7683(00)00315-2 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.10.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.10.003 ↗
24. Ashby · 2000
25. 10.1016/j.jmps.2010.09.00410.1016/j.jmps.2010.09.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.00710.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.007 ↗
27. 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90177-910.1016/0001-6160(84)90177-9 ↗
28. Meirovitch · 2010
29. 10.1038/3506903510.1038/35069035 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20070079710.1002/adma.200700797 ↗
31. Gibson · 1999
32. Godfrey · 2012
33. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04599.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04599.x ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.03.01810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.03.018 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.08.00910.1016/j.jmps.2012.08.009 ↗
36. 10.1115/1.400786510.1115/1.4007865 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.03.04210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.03.042 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.027 ↗
39. 10.1126/science.111895710.1126/science.1118957 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.007 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.031 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.05110.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.051 ↗