journal article·2013-09-14

Compressive strength of hollow microlattices: Experimental characterization, modeling, and optimal design

Lorenzo Valdevit, Scott W. Godfrey, Tobias A. Schaedler, Alan J. Jacobsen, William B. Carter

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 28· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Recent advances in multiscale manufacturing enable fabrication of hollow-truss based lattices with dimensional control spanning seven orders of magnitude in length scale (from ∼50 nm to ∼10 cm), thus enabling the exploitation of nano-scale strengthening mechanisms in a macroscale cellular material. This article develops mechanical models for the compressive strength of hollow microlattices and validates them with a selection of experimental measurements on nickel microlattices over a wide relative density range (0.01–10%). The limitations of beam-theory-based analytical approaches for ultralight designs are emphasized, and suitable numerical (finite elements) models are presented. Subsequently, a novel computational platform is utilized to efficiently scan the entire design space and produce maps for optimally strong designs. The results indicate that a strong compressive response can be obtained by stubby lattice designs at relatively high densities (∼10%) or by selectively thickening the nodes at ultra-low densities.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Compressive stiffness of micro-architected materials: Experimental characterization, modeling and optimal design
2. 19. Godfrey S.W. , and Valdevit L. : A novel modeling platform for characterization and optimal design of micro-architected materials. In Proceedings of 2012 AIAA SDM Conference, Honolulu, HI; Paper 2012–2003.10.2514/6.2012-2003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.00510.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.121164910.1126/science.1211649 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00266-510.1016/S0266-3538(03)00266-5 ↗
6. 10.1002/1527-2648(20021014)4:10<726::AID-ADEM726>3.0.CO;2-Y10.1002/1527-2648(20021014)4:10<726::AID-ADEM726>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
7. 10.1080/1478643050007394510.1080/14786430500073945 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.027 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.05.04510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.05.045 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-210.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04599.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04599.x ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.06.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.06.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.03.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.03.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00016-510.1016/S0079-6425(00)00016-5 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.296627010.1115/1.2966270 ↗
16. Parallel modeling of node-forming periodic solid and hollow 3D lattices using parametric and procedural constructive solid geometries
17. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.03.04210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.03.042 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.481816810.1063/1.4818168 ↗
19. Timoshenko · 1961
20. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.00710.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.007 ↗
21. 22. Jacobsen A.J. , Kolodziejska J.A. , Doty R. , Fink K.D. , Zhou C. , Roper C.S. , and Carter W.B. : Interconnected self-propagating photopolymer waveguides: An alternative to stereolithography for rapid formation of lattice-based open-cellular materials. In Twenty-First Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX (2010).
22. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00375-510.1016/S0020-7683(03)00375-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.007 ↗