journal article·2003-09

Nanoindentation measurements on Cu–Sn and Ag–Sn intermetallics formed in Pb-free solder joints

R. R. Chromik, R. P. Vinci, S. L. Allen, M. R. Notis

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 18· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanoindentation testing has been used to measure the hardness and elastic modulus of Ag3Sn, Cu6Sn5, and Cu3Sn intermetallics, as well as Sn–Ag–Cu solder and pure Sn and Cu. The intermetallics were fabricated by solid-state annealing of diffusion couples prepared from a substrate (Cu or Ag) and a solder material (Sn or Sn–Ag–Cu solder), providing geometries and length scales as close as possible to a real solder joint. Nanoindentation results for the intermetallics, representing penetration depths of 20–220 nm and loads from 0.7 to 9.5 mN, reveal elastic/plastic deformation without evidence of fracture. Measured hardness values of Cu6Sn5 (6.5 ± 0.3 GPa) and Cu3Sn (6.2 ± 0.4 GPa) indicate a potential for brittle behavior, while Ag3Sn (2.9 ± 0.2 GPa) appears much softer and ductile. Using a bulk Cu6Sn5 sample, Vickers hardness testing revealed an indentation size effect for this compound, with a hardness of 4.3 GPa measured at a load of 9.8 N. An energy balance model is used to explain the dependence of hardness with load or depth, where the observation of an increasing amount of fracture with applied load is identified as the primary mechanism. This result explains discrepancies between nanoindentation and Vickers results previously reported.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 37. Ghosh G. (Paper presented at TMS Annual Meeting, March 2003).
2. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01828-710.1016/S0921-5093(01)01828-7 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11664-002-0015-910.1007/s11664-002-0015-9 ↗
4. Tabor · 1951 · 67
5. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00175-110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00175-1 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0040087410.1007/BF00400874 ↗
7. 10.1080/00202967.1976.1187037610.1080/00202967.1976.11870376 ↗
8. 10.2320/matertrans1960.16.53910.2320/matertrans1960.16.539 ↗
9. 10.1007/978-0-387-22462-6_810.1007/978-0-387-22462-6_8 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0042-207X(00)00377-810.1016/S0042-207X(00)00377-8 ↗
11. 10.1557/JMR.1999.029510.1557/JMR.1999.0295 ↗
12. Cabaret · J. Inst. Metals · 1949 · 75 · 391
13. 10.2320/matertrans1960.13.9310.2320/matertrans1960.13.93 ↗
14. Chromik · 2002 · 786
15. Chromik · 1997 · 445 · 31
16. Suganuma · 2001 · 4587 · 529
17. 10.1016/S1359-0286(00)00036-X10.1016/S1359-0286(00)00036-X ↗
18. 10.1109/95.48662510.1109/95.486625 ↗
19. Manko · 2001 · 61
20. Morris · 1994 · 7
21. Marshall · 1994 · 42
22. 10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00086-X10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00086-X ↗
23. 10.1002/pssa.221042010610.1002/pssa.2210420106 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0167-577X(98)00158-X10.1016/S0167-577X(98)00158-X ↗
25. Ostrovskaya · Soviet J. Non-Ferrous Metall. · 1985 · 26 · 90
26. Marshall · 1986 · 26
27. Sargent · 1986 · 160
28. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11664-002-0163-y10.1007/s11664-002-0163-y ↗
30. 10.1557/JMR.2002.040210.1557/JMR.2002.0402 ↗
31. 10.1557/JMR.1999.029610.1557/JMR.1999.0296 ↗
32. Fields · 1991 · 165
33. Lehman · 2003 · 1215
34. Lee · J. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 17 · 110.1557/JMR.2002.0001 ↗
35. 10.1023/A:100477760755310.1023/A:1004777607553 ↗
36. 10.1023/A:101867182305910.1023/A:1018671823059 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11664-000-0003-x10.1007/s11664-000-0003-x ↗