journal article·2015-03-14

Can microscale fracture tests provide reliable fracture toughness values? A case study in silicon

Balila Nagamani Jaya, Christoph Kirchlechner, Gerhard Dehm

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 30· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Fracture toughness testing of materials at the micrometer scale has become essential due to the continuing miniaturization of devices accompanied by findings of size effects in fracture behavior. Many techniques have emerged in the recent past to carry out fracture toughness measurements at the relevant micro and nanolength scales, but they lack ASTM standards that are prescribed for bulk scale tests. Also, differences in reported values arise at the microscale due to the sample preparation technique, test method, geometry, and investigator. To correct for such discrepancies, we chose four different fracture toughness test geometries in practice, all of them micromachined in the focused ion beam (FIB), to investigate the fracture toughness of Si(100) at the micrometer scale. The averageKICthat emerges from all four cases is a constant (0.8 MPa m1/2). The advantages and limitations of each of these geometries in terms of test parameters and the range of materials that can be tested are discussed.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. A tapered double cantilever beam specimen designed for constant K-testing at elevated temperatures10.1520/JTE11493J ↗
2. Noyen · 1987
3. 10.1109/JMEMS.2009.203969710.1109/JMEMS.2009.2039697 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0924-4247(02)00268-610.1016/S0924-4247(02)00268-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-610.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-6 ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-14540910.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145409 ↗
7. 10.1088/0960-1317/6/3/00210.1088/0960-1317/6/3/002 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.114785210.1063/1.1147852 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20090041810.1002/adfm.200900418 ↗
10. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.32510.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.325 ↗
11. 49. Qiao Y. : PhD Thesis, MIT, 2002.
12. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00920.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00920.x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.07.14310.1016/j.tsf.2009.07.143 ↗
14. A novel pillar indentation splitting test for measuring fracture toughness of thin ceramic coatings
15. 10.1063/1.480392810.1063/1.4803928 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01327.x10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01327.x ↗
17. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.297-300.241610.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.297-300.2416 ↗
18. Myers · 1977 · 3 · 1001
19. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5943-310.1007/978-1-4757-5943-3 ↗
20. 10.1002/adem.20060015310.1002/adem.200600153 ↗
21. 10.1590/S0366-6913200800030001810.1590/S0366-69132008000300018 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10704-006-0021-710.1007/s10704-006-0021-7 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20060270510.1002/adma.200602705 ↗
24. 12. ASTM E 1820-01: Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness. In Ann Book ASTM Std, Vol. 03.01, 2001, pp. 1–46.
25. 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00323-510.1016/S0043-1648(03)00323-5 ↗
26. 10.1080/09500839.2011.57381310.1080/09500839.2011.573813 ↗
27. Timoshenko · 1951
28. 10.1557/JMR.2005.004810.1557/JMR.2005.0048 ↗
29. Universal testing machine for mechanical properties of thin materials
30. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.021 ↗
31. 10.1080/14786435.2012.66906810.1080/14786435.2012.669068 ↗
32. 41. Iqbal F. : Fracture mechanisms of γ-TiAl alloys investigated by in-situ experiments in a scanning electron and atomic force microscope. PhD Thesis, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany, 2012.
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.06010.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.060 ↗
34. 10.6028/jres.042.00910.6028/jres.042.009 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.02110.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.021 ↗
36. Small-scale mechanical testing of materials
37. 10.1557/PROC-239-30110.1557/PROC-239-301 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00077-510.1016/S0921-5093(99)00077-5 ↗
39. 10.1557/PROC-505-28510.1557/PROC-505-285 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10704-014-9956-210.1007/s10704-014-9956-2 ↗
41. Ritchie · 2003
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.260110.1103/PhysRevB.48.2601 ↗
43. 10.1115/1.217226810.1115/1.2172268 ↗
44. Optimisation of clamped beam geometry for fracture toughness testing of micron-scale samples
45. 40. Mueller M. : Microscopic chevron-notch fracture test of alumina reinforcements. Nanobruecken (2014).
46. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
47. Fracture toughness of Si
48. Podor · 2012 · 32
49. 10.1557/jmr.2009.014410.1557/jmr.2009.0144 ↗
50. 10.1002/0470869097.ch310.1002/0470869097.ch3 ↗
51. 10.1557/jmr.2011.34810.1557/jmr.2011.348 ↗
52. 32. Sebastiani M. : Private communication, 2014.
53. 10.1557/PROC-505-5110.1557/PROC-505-51 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.00510.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
55. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00923.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00923.x ↗
56. 10.1080/14786435.2012.65844910.1080/14786435.2012.658449 ↗
57. 10.1080/1478643100380088310.1080/14786431003800883 ↗
58. 10.1177/030932471039601810.1177/0309324710396018 ↗
59. 21. Kupka D. : Fracture experiments of single grain boundaries in ductile metals. PhD Thesis, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Germany, 2013.
60. 10.1016/S0924-4247(99)00366-010.1016/S0924-4247(99)00366-0 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.114976910.1063/1.1149769 ↗