Boundary between Plane Stress and Plane Strain of Compression Concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Please select a country... Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Overseas Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (the Republic of) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Kosovo, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome And Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St Vincent And Grenadines St. Helena Ascensian and Tristan da Aunh Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis And Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country/Territory is required
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Saliger, R., “Bruchzustand und Sicherheit im Eisenbetonbalken,” Beton und Eisen, V. 35, No. 19, Oct. 1936, pp. 317-320. (in German)10.1007/978-3-7091-5319-2 ↗
2. Rüsch, H., “Versuche zur Festigkeit der Biegedruckzone,” Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton, Berlin, Germany, V. 120, 1955, pp. 1-94. (in German)
3. Gonzalez, D., and Vicente, M. A., “Behavior of High Strength Concrete under Bending Compression,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Utilization of High-Strength/High-Performance Concrete, Sandefjord, Norway, June 1999, V. 1, pp. 302-311.
4. Schneeberger, H., “The Distribution of the Stress in the Cross-Section of a Beam: A Problem of Galilei,” Innovations and Developments in Concrete Materials and Construction: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Dundee Scotland, UK on 9-11 September 2002, R. K. Dhir, P. C. Hewlett, and L. J. Csetenyi, eds., Thomas Telford Ltd., London, UK, 2002, pp. 699-708.
5. Sakhnovskiy, K. V., Reinforced Concrete Structures, Gosstroizdat, Moscow-Leningrad, Russia, 1939. (in Russian)
6. Loleiyt, A.F., “About Necessity of Working Out of Formulas for Sections Choice for Reinforced Concrete Structure Elements on the New Principles,” Building Industry, 1932, No. 5, pp. 1-6. (in Russian)
7. Kazinczy, G., “Die Plastizität des Eisenbetons,” Beton und Eisen, V. 32, No. 5, 1933, pp. 1-8.
8. EN 1992-1-1, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1 – 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
9. Fédération internationale du béton, “fib Model Code of Concrete Structures 2010,” fib, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2013, 434 pp.
10. Mitrofanov, V. P., “Extreme Strength Criterion and Design of RC Elements,” Structural Concrete, V. 10, No. 4, Dec. 2009, pp. 163-172. doi: 10.1680/stco.2009.10.4.16310.1680/stco.2009.10.4.163 ↗
11. Mitrofanov, V., “The Theory of Perfect Plasticity as the Elementary Mechanics of a Pseudo-plastic Ultimate State of Concrete: Bases, Limitations, Practical Aspects, Improving,” Proceedings of the Second fib Congress, V. 1, Sessions 1-9, Naples, Italy, 2006, pp. 496-497.
12. Mitrofanov, V. P.; Pinchuk, N. M.; and Mitrofanov, P. B., “The Primary Design Conceptions of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures in the ADM Model Code,” Proceedings of the Fourth International fib Congress 2014, Mumbai, India, 2014, Paper No. 73, pp. 259-261.
13. Murashev, V. I., Design of Reinforced Concrete Elements on the Failure Stage, Gosstroizdat, Moscow-Leningrad, 1938. (in Russian)
14. Timoshenko, S. P., and Goodier, J. N., Theory of Elasticity, third edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.
15. Geniev, G. A.; Kissuk, V. N.; and Tupin, G. A., Theory of Plasticity of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete, Stroyizdat, Moscow, Russia, 1974. (in Russian)
16. Kishkin, B.P., Structural Strength of Materials, Moscow University Press, Moscow, Russia, 1976. (in Russian)
17. Voskoboynik, P. P., “Complex Stress State of Concrete Failure Zone and Taking into Account of the One in the Strength Designs of RC Elements Cross Sections,” PhD thesis, OISI, Odessa, Ukraine, 1985. (in Russian)
18. Weiss, W. J.; Güler, K.; and Shah, S. P., “An Experimental Investigation to Determine the Influence of Size on the Flexural Behavior of High Strength Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Utilization of High-Strength/High-Performance Concrete, Sandefjord, Norway, June 1999, V. 1, pp. 709-718.
19. Kachanov, L. M., Fundamentals of the Theory of Plasticity, second edition, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 1969. (in Russian)
20. Mitrofanov, V. P., “The Stress-Strain State, Strength and Cracking of the RC Elements under Cross Bending,” PhD thesis, VZISI, Moscow, Russia, 1982. (in Russian)
21. Hognestad, E., “What Do We Know About Diagonal Tension And Web Reinforcement In Concrete? A Historical Study,” Engineering Experiment Station. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 1952, 47 pp.
22. Rombah, G., and Henze, L., “Shear Capacity of Concrete Slabs Without Shear Reinforcement Under Concentrated Loads Close to Support,” High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and Engineering Meet: Proceedings of the 2017 fib Symposium, held in Maastricht, The Netherlands, June 12-14, 2017, D. A. Hordijk and M. Luković, eds., 2017, pp. 676-683.10.1007/978-3-319-59471-2_80 ↗