Experimental Investigation of Prestress Losses in Full-Scale Bridge Girders
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Please select a country... Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Overseas Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (the Republic of) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Kosovo, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome And Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St Vincent And Grenadines St. Helena Ascensian and Tristan da Aunh Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis And Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country/Territory is required
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Properties and Behavior · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Gallardo Méndez, J. M., “Model of Strain-Related Prestress Loss in Pretensioned Simply Supported Bridge Girders,” PhD dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2013, 330 pp.
2. Garber, D.; Gallardo, J.; Deschenes, D.; Dunkman, D.; and Bayrak, O., “Effect of New Prestress Loss Estimates on Pretensioned Concrete Bridge Girder Design,” Report No. FHWA/TX-12/0-6374-2, Center for Transportation Research, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2013, 300 pp.
3. Neville, A. M.; Dilger, W. H.; and Brooks, J. J., Creep of Plain and Structural Concrete, Construction Press, 1983, 380 pp.
4. Tadros, M. K.; Al-Omaishi, N.; Seguirant, S. J.; and Gallt, J. G., “Prestress Losses in Pretensioned High-Strength Concrete Bridge Girders,” NCHRP Report 496, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2003, 73 pp.
5. Bažant, Z. P., and Wittmann, F. H., Creep and Shrinkage in Concrete Structures, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982.
6. Juenger, M. C. G., and Jennings, H. M., “Examining the Relationship between the Microstructure of Calcium Silicate Hydrate and Drying Shrinkage of Cement Pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 32, No. 2, 2002, pp. 289-296. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00673-110.1016/S0008-8846(01)00673-1 ↗
7. Mindess, S.; Young, J.; and Darwin, D., Concrete, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002, 644 pp.
8. Powers, T., “The Thermodynamics of Volume Change and Creep,” Matériaux et Construction, V. 1, No. 6, 1968, pp. 487-507. doi: 10.1007/BF0247363810.1007/BF02473638 ↗
9. Tazawa, E. I.; Sato, R.; Sakai, E.; and Miyazawa, S., “Work of JCI Committee on Autogenous Shrinkage,” International RILEM Workshop on Shrinkage of Concrete (Shrinkage 2000), V. Baroghel-Bouny and P.-C. Aïtcin, eds., RILEM, Bagneux, France, 2000, pp. 21-40.
10. Bažant, Z. P.; Hauggaard, A. B.; Baweja, S.; and Ulm, F.-J., “Microprestress-Solidification Theory for Concrete Creep. I: Aging and Drying Effects,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, V. 123, No. 11, 1997, pp. 1188-1194. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:11(1188)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:11(1188) ↗
11. Hansen, T. C.; Radjy, F.; and Sellevold, E. J., “Cement Paste and Concrete,” Annual Review of Materials Science, V. 3, No. 1, 1973, pp. 233-268. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ms.03.080173.00131310.1146/annurev.ms.03.080173.001313 ↗
12. Ulm, F.; Le Maou, F.; and Boulay, C., “Creep and Shrinkage of Concrete—Kinetics Approach,” The Adam Neville Symposium: Creep and Shrinkage—Structural Design Effects, SP-194, A. Al-Manaseer, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2000, pp. 135-154.
13. Vandamme, M., and Ulm, F.-J., “Nanogranular Origin of Concrete Creep,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, V. 106, No. 26, 2009, pp. 10552-10557. doi: 10.1073/pnas.090103310610.1073/pnas.0901033106 ↗
14. Magura, D. D.; Sozen, M. A.; and Siess, C. P., “A Study of Stress Relaxation in Prestressing Reinforcement,” Civil Engineering Studies SRS-237, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1962, 116 pp.
15. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 520 pp.
16. Birrcher, D. B.; Bayrak, O.; and Kreger, M. E., “Effects of Increasing Allowable Compressive Stress at Prestress Transfer,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 107, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2010, pp. 21-31.10.14359/51663385 ↗
17. TxDOT, “Standard Specification for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and Bridges,” Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX, 2012.
18. AASHTO, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification, Customary U.S. Units, 6th Edition,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2012, 1925 pp.
19. Brooks, J., “30-Year Creep and Shrinkage of Concrete,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 57, No. 9, 2005, pp. 545-556. doi: 10.1680/macr.2005.57.9.54510.1680/macr.2005.57.9.545 ↗
20. Mokhtarzadeh, A., and French, C., “Time-Dependent Properties of High-Strength Concrete with Consideration for Precast Applications,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 97, No. 3, May-June 2000, pp. 263-271.10.14359/4621 ↗
21. PCI, PCI Design Handbook, seventh edition, Precast and Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, 2010, 804 pp.