Mixture Design for Lightweight Geopolymer Concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
The American Concrete Institute (ACI) is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development and distribution of consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, certification programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Properties and Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 213, “Guide for Structural Lightweight-Aggregate Concrete (ACI PRC-213-14) (Reapproved 2023),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 53 pp.
2. Nawy, E. G., Fundamentals of High-Performance Concrete, second edition, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2000, 464 pp.
3. Pongsopha, P.; Sukontasukkul, P.; Zhang, H.; and Limkatanyu, S., “Thermal and Acoustic Properties of Sustainable Structural Lightweight Aggregate Rubberized Concrete,” Results in Engineering, V. 13, No. 3, Mar. 2022.10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100333 ↗
4. Carrillo, J.; Lizarazo, J. M.; and Bonett, R., “Effect of Lightweight and Low-Strength Concrete on Seismic Performance of Thin Lightly-Reinforced Shear Walls,” Engineering Structures, V. 93, 2015, pp. 61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.02210.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.022 ↗
5. Go, C. G.; Tang, J. R.; Chi, J. H.; Chen, C.-T.; and Huang, Y.-L., “Fire-Resistance Property of Reinforced Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Wall,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 30, 2012, pp. 725-733. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.08110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.081 ↗
6. ACI Committee 211, “Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Structural Lightweight Concrete (ACI 211.2-98) (Reapproved 2004),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1998, 20 pp.
7. Tale Masoule, M. S.; Bahrami, N.; Karimzadeh, M.; Mohasanati, B.; Shoaei, P.; Ameri, F.; and Ozbakkaloglu, T., “Lightweight Geopolymer Concrete: A Critical Review on the Feasibility, Mixture Design, Durability Properties, and Microstructure,” Ceramics International, V. 48, No. 8, 2022, pp. 10347-10371. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.29810.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.298 ↗
8. Elmesalami, N., and Celik, K., “A Critical Review of Engineered Geopolymer Composite: A Low-Carbon Ultra-High-Performance Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 346, Sept. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12849110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128491 ↗
9. Mohamed, R.; Abd Razak, R.; Abdullah, M. M. A. B.; Rahim, S. Z. A. A; Yuan-Li, L.; Subaer; Sandu, A. V.; and Wystocki, J. J., “Heat Evolution of Alkali-Activated Materials: A Review on Influence Factors,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 314, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12565110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125651 ↗
10. Lahoti, M.; Tan, K. H.; and Yang, E. H., “A Critical Review of Geopolymer Properties for Structural Fire-Resistance Applications,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 221, 2019, pp. 514-526. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.07610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.076 ↗
11. Ozcelikci, E.; Kul, A.; Gunal, M. F.; Ozel, B. F.; Yildirim, G.; Ashour, A.; and Sahmaran, M., “A Comprehensive Study on the Compressive Strength, Durability-Related Parameters and Microstructure of Geopolymer Mortars Based on Mixed Construction and Demolition Waste,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 396, Apr. 2023.10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136522 ↗
12. Ansari, M. A.; Shariq, M.; and Mahdi, F., “Geopolymer Concrete for Clean and Sustainable Construction – A State-of-the-Art Review on the Mix Design Approaches,” Structures, V. 55, 2023, pp. 1045-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.08910.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.089 ↗
13. Onoue, K.; Sagawa, Y.; Atarashi, D.; and Takayama, Y., “Optimization of Mix Proportions and Manufacturing Conditions of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortar by Parameters Design with Dynamic Characteristics,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 133, 2022.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104645 ↗
14. Gopalakrishna, B., and Dinakar, P., “The Study on Various Temperature Condition of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Mortar,” Materials Today: Proceedings, V. 93, 2023, pp. 234-238. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.17610.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.176 ↗
15. Ghafoor, M. T.; Fujiyama, C.; and Maekawa, K., “Mix Design Processing for Self Compacting Geopolymer Mortar,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 19, No. 11, 2021, pp. 1133-1147. doi: 10.3151/jact.19.113310.3151/jact.19.1133 ↗
16. Pavithra, P.; Srinivasula Reddy, M.; Dinakar, P.; Hanumantha Rao, B.; Satpathy, B. K.; and Mohanty, A. N., “A Mix Design Procedure for Geopolymer Concrete with Fly Ash,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 133, 2016, pp. 117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.04110.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.041 ↗
17. Nunez, I.; Marani, A.; Flah, M.; and Nehdi, M. L., “Estimating Compressive Strength of Modern Concrete Mixtures Using Computational Intelligence: A Systematic Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 310, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12527910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125279 ↗
18. Adessina, A.; Fraj, A. B.; and Barthélémy, J. F., “Improvement of the Compressive Strength of Recycled Aggregate Concretes and Relative Effects on Durability Properties,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 384, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13144710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131447 ↗
19. Luan, C., Shi, X., Zhang, K., Utashev, N.; Yang, F.; Dai, J.; and Wang, Q., “A Mix Design Method of Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete Based on Factors Analysis,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 272, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12161210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121612 ↗
20. Dinesh, A.; Anitha Selvasofia, S. D.; Datcheen, K. S.; and Rakhesh Varshan, D., “Machine Learning for Strength Evaluation of Concrete Structures – Critical Review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.09010.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.090 ↗
21. Ahmed, A. H.; Jin, W.; and Hussein, M. A., “Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Mechanical Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC): Critical Review,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 20, No. 6, 2022, pp. 404-429. doi: 10.3151/jact.20.40410.3151/jact.20.404 ↗
22. Hu, X.; Li, B.; Mo, Y.; and Alselwi, O., “Progress in Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Concrete Performance,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 19, No. 8, 2021, pp. 924-936. doi: 10.3151/jact.19.92410.3151/jact.19.924 ↗
23. Zhang, C.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, F.; Yang, Y.; Wan, Y.; Huo, W.; and Yang, L., “Efficient Machine Learning Method for Evaluating Compressive Strength of Cement Stabilized Soft Soil,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 392, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13188710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131887 ↗
24. Parathi, S.; Nagarajan, P.; and Pallikkara, S. A., “Ecofriendly Geopolymer Concrete: A Comprehensive Review,” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, V. 23, No. 6, 2021, pp. 1701-1713. doi: 10.1007/s10098-021-02085-010.1007/s10098-021-02085-0 ↗
25. Pather, B.; Ekolu, S. O.; and Quainoo, H., “Effects of Aggregate Types on Acid Corrosion Attack Upon Fly-Ash Geopolymer and Portland Cement Concretes – Comparative Study,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 313, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12546810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125468 ↗
26. Luo, Y., Jiang, Z., Wang, D., Lv, Y.; Gao, C.; and Xue, G., “Effects of Alkaline Activators on Pore Structure and Mechanical Properties of Ultrafine Metakaolin Geopolymers Cured at Room Temperature,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 361, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12967810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129678 ↗
27. Nakum, A. V., and Arora, N. K., “The Impact of Alkaline Solution to Fly Ash Ratio with Different Molarities of Sodium Hydroxide on Self-Compacted Geopolymer Concrete,” Materials Today: Proceedings, V. 62, 2022, pp. 4168-4176. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.68810.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.688 ↗
28. Praveen Kumar, K.; Radhakrishna; Ramesh, P. S.; and Aravinda, P. T., “Effect of Fines on Strength and Durability of Concrete with Manufactured Sand,” Materials Today: Proceedings, V. 66, 2022, pp. 2381-2386.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.334 ↗
29. Bejan, G.; Barbua, M.; Vizitiu, R. S.; and Burlacu, A., “Lightweight Concrete with Waste – Review,” Procedia Manufacturing, V. 46, 2020, pp. 136-143.10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.021 ↗
30. Thukkaram, S., and Kumar, A. A., “Behaviour of Sewage Sludge-Based Lightweight Aggregate in Geopolymer Concrete,” Materials Research Express, V. 11, No. 5, 2024, p. 055501. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ad419810.1088/2053-1591/ad4198 ↗
31. Yu, L.; Wang, S.; Qiao, Z.; Xu, L.; Wu, K.; Li, P.; and Yang, Z., “Effect of Curing Time and Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of Green and Ultra-High-Strength Non-Sintered Aggregate Via Autoclave Technology,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 374, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13087410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130874 ↗
32. Zaid, O.; Alsharari, F.; Althoey, F.; Elhag, A. B.; Hadidi, H. M.; and Abuhussain, M. A., “Assessing the Performance of Palm Oil Fuel Ash and Lytag on the Development of Ultra-High-Performance Self-Compacting Lightweight Concrete with Waste Tire Steel Fibers,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 76, Oct. 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10711210.1016/j.jobe.2023.107112 ↗
33. Gultekin, A., and Ramyar, K., “Effect of Curing Type on Microstructure and Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Mortars,” Ceramics International, V. 48, No. 11, 2022, pp. 16156-16172. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.16310.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.163 ↗
34. Dong, W.; Huang, Y.; Cui, A.; and Ma, G., “Mix Design Optimization for Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer with Mechanical, Environmental, and Economic Objectives Using Soft Computing Technology,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 72, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10657710.1016/j.jobe.2023.106577 ↗
35. Kamath, M.; Prashant, S.; and Kumar, M., “Micro-Characterisation of Alkali Activated Paste with Fly Ash-GGBS-Metakaolin Binder System with Ambient Setting Characteristics,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 277, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12232310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122323 ↗
36. Xu, C.; Fu, L.; Lin, T.; Li, W.; and Ma, S., “Machine Learning in Petrophysics: Advantages and Limitations,” Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences, V. 3, 2022, pp. 157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.aiig.2022.11.00410.1016/j.aiig.2022.11.004 ↗
37. Khan, M. I., and Abbas, Y. M., “Robust Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression Model for Compressive Strength Prediction of Blast Furnace Slag and Fly Ash Concrete,” Materials Today. Communications, V. 35, 2023, p. 105793 doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10579310.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105793 ↗
38. Zhang, J.; Ma, G.; Huang, Y.; sun, J.; Aslani, F.; and Nener, B., “Modelling Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Lightweight Self-Compacting Concrete Using Random Forest Regression,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 210, 2019, pp. 713-719. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.18910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.189 ↗
39. Bezabih, T.; Kanali, C.; and Thuo, J., “Effects of Teff Straw Ash on the Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Ambient Cured Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortar for Onsite Applications,” Results in Engineering, V. 18, 2023.10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101123 ↗
40. John, S. K.; Nadir, Y.; and Girija, K., “Effect of Source Materials, Additives on the Mechanical Properties and Durability of Fly Ash and Fly Ash-Slag Geopolymer Mortar: A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 280, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12244310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122443 ↗
41. Toniolo, N., and Boccaccini, A. R., “Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers Containing Added Silicate Waste. A Review,” Ceramics International, V. 43, No. 17, 2017, pp. 14545-14551. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.22110.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.221 ↗
42. Li, X.; Bai, C.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, K.; and Colombo, P., “Preparation, Properties and Applications of Fly Ash-Based Porous Geopolymers: A Review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 359, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13204310.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132043 ↗
43. Klima, K. M.; Schollbach, K.; Brouwers, H. J. H.; and Yu, Q., “Thermal and Fire Resistance of Class F Fly Ash Based Geopolymers – A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 323, Mar. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12652910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126529 ↗
44. Atabey, I. I.; Karahan, O.; Bilim, C.; and Atiş, C. D., “The Influence of Activator Type and Quantity on the Transport Properties of Class F Fly Ash Geopolymer,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 264, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12026810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120268 ↗
45. Onoue, K.; Sagawa, Y.; Atarashi, D.; and Takayama, Y., “Optimization of Mix Proportions and Manufacturing Conditions of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortar by Parameters Design with Dynamic Characteristics,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 133, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.10464510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104645 ↗
46. Jiao, Z.; Li, X.; Yu, Q.; Yao, Q.; and Hu, P., “Sulfate Resistance of Class C/Class F Fly Ash Geopolymers,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, V 23, 2023, pp. 1767-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.13110.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.131 ↗
47. Liu, M.; Hu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; and Ma, Z., “Effect of Ground Concrete Waste as Green Binder on the Micro-Macro Properties of Eco-Friendly Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Mortar,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 68, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10619110.1016/j.jobe.2023.106191 ↗
48. Oyejobi, D. O.; Adewuyi, A. P.; Hassan, I. A.; Suleiman, I.; Oyebanji, Y. O.; and Yusuf, S. O., “Performance Evaluation of Fly-Ash Based Geopolymer Mortar,” Materials Today: Proceedings, V. 86, 2023, pp. 88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.29210.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.292 ↗
49. Karakaş, H.; İlkentapar, S.; Durak, U.; and Örklemez, E., “Properties of Fly Ash-Based Lightweight-Geopolymer Mortars Containing Perlite Aggregates: Mechanical, Microstructure, and Thermal Conductivity Coefficient,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 362, 2023.doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12971710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129717 ↗
50. Tenepalli, J. S., and Neeraja, D., “Properties of Class F Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Mortar Produced with Alkaline Water,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 19, 2018, pp. 42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.03110.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.031 ↗
51. Zhang, R.; Li, Y.; Goh, A. T. C.; Zhang, W.; and Chen, Z., “Analysis of Ground Surface Settlement in Anisotropic Clays Using Extreme Gradient Boosting and Random Forest Regression Models,” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, V. 13, No. 6, 2021, pp. 1478-1484. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.08.00110.1016/j.jrmge.2021.08.001 ↗
52. Soutsos, M.; Boyle, A. P.; Vinai, R.; Hadjierakleous, A.; and Barnett, S. J., “Factors Influencing the Compressive Strength of Fly Ash Based Geopolymers,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 110, 2016, pp. 355-368. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.045 ↗
53. Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Basu, S., Kumbier, K.; and Yu, B., “A Debiased MDI Feature Importance Measure for Random Forests,” 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019, pp. 1-11.
54. Belgiu, M., and Drăguţ, L., “Random Forest in Remote Sensing: A Review of Applications and Future Directions,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, V. 114, 2016, pp. 24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.01110.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 ↗
55. Otchere, D. A.; Ganat, T. O. A.; Nta, V.; Brantson, E. T.; and Sharma, T., “Data Analytics and Bayesian Optimised Extreme Gradient Boosting Approach to Estimate Cut-Offs From Wireline Logs for Net Reservoir and Pay Classification,” Applied Soft Computing, V. 120, 2022.10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108680 ↗
56. Chicco, D.; Warrens, M. J.; and Jurman, G., “The Coefficient of Determination R-Squared is more Informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in Regression Analysis Evaluation,” PeerJ Computer Science, V. 7, 2021, pp. 1-24. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.62310.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
57. Emmanuel, T.; Maupong, T.; Mpoeleng, D.; Semong, T.; Mphago, B.; and Tabona, O., “A Survey on Missing Data in Machine Learning,” Journal of Big Data, V. 8, No. 1, 2021, p. 140. doi: 10.1186/s40537-021-00516-910.1186/s40537-021-00516-9 ↗
58. Sangoju, B.; Ramesh, G.; Bharatkumar, B. H.; and Ramanjaneyulu, K., “Evaluation of Durability Parameters of Concrete with Manufacture Sand and River Sand,” Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, V. 98, No. 3, 2017, pp. 267-275.10.1007/s40030-017-0204-4 ↗
59. Khale, D., and Chaudhary, R., “Mechanism of Geopolymerization and Factors Influencing Its Development: A Review,” Journal of Materials Science, V. 42, No. 3, 2007, pp. 729-746. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0401-410.1007/s10853-006-0401-4 ↗