journal article·2018-07-01Open access

Interfacial Transition Zone in Mature Fiber-Reinforced Concretes

Authors not provided

ACI Materials Journal· Volume 115· Issue 4

Abstract

The Interfacial Transition Zone (ITZ) in concrete is the region of the cement paste that is disturbed by the presence of an aggregate or fiber. This work focuses on the ITZ around silica and dolomite grains and steel fibers. The analysis performed is based on: the macroscale properties of the specimens; petrographic analyses with polarized microscopy; and qualitative and quantitative SEM analyses. The following types of concrete were tested: standard quality (SQ); high-quality with steel fibers (PFRC); and Ultra High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC). The most important parameters affecting ITZ are: the properties of the disturbing elements and the mix composition of the concrete. In PFRC, a differentiated zone of thickness 20 m (787.40 in) was observed around a dolomite grain, showing a preferential growth of Ca-based compounds. In UHPFRC, SEM-EDS analysis revealed CSH of lower Ca/Si ratios in the proximity of fibers and aggregates.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Scrivener, K., “Characterization of the ITZ and its Quantification by Test Method,” Engineering and Transport Properties of the Interfacial Transition Zone in Cementitious Composites, RILEM Publications, Paris, France, 1999, pp. 3-14.
2. Ollivier, J. P.; Maso, J. C.; and Bourdette, B., Interfacial Transition Zone in Concrete, Elsevier Science Inc., 1995.10.1016/1065-7355(95)90037-3 ↗
3. Prokopski, G., and Halbiniak, J., “Interfacial Transition Zone in Cementitious Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 30, No. 4, 2000, pp. 579-583. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00210-610.1016/S0008-8846(00)00210-6 ↗
4. Bentur, A., and Cohen, M. D., “Effect of Condensed Silica Fume on the Microstructure of the Interfacial Zone in Portland Cement Mortars,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 70, No. 10, 1987, pp. 738-743. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04873.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04873.x ↗
5. Scheydt, J. C., and Müller, H. S., “Microstructure of Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) and its Impact on Durability,” Ultra-High Performance Concrete and Nanotechnology in Construction (Hipermat), Kassel, Germany, 2012.
6. Jennings, H., and Jeffrey, T. J., “Materials of Cement Science Primer: The Science of Concrete,” Infrastructure Technology Institute (ITI), Research and Innovative Technology Administration, 2009.
7. Šachlová, Š.; Přikryl, R.; and Pertold, Z., “Alkali-Silica Reaction Products: Comparison between Samples from Concrete Structures and Laboratory Test Specimens,” Materials Characterization, V. 61, No. 12, 2010, pp. 1379-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2010.09.01010.1016/j.matchar.2010.09.010 ↗
8. Gao, Y.; De Schutter, G.; Ye, G.; Huang, H.; Yu, Z.; and Wu, K., “Investigation on the Interfacial Transition Zone in Ternary Blended Cement-Based Composites with Respect to Curing Age and Water-Binder Ratio,” First International Conference on Concrete Sustainability, Tokyo, Japan, 2013.
9. Bentur, A., and Alexander, M. G., “A Review of the Work of the RILEM TC 159-ETC: Engineering of the Interfacial Transition Zone in Cementitious Composites,” Materials and Structures, V. 33, No. 2, 2000, pp. 82-87. doi: 10.1007/BF0248416010.1007/BF02484160 ↗
10. Elsharief, A.; Cohen, M. D.; and Olek, J., “Influence of Aggregate Size, Water Cement Tatio and Ag on the Microstructure of the Interfacial Transition Zone,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 33, No. 11, 2003, pp. 1837-1849. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00205-910.1016/S0008-8846(03)00205-9 ↗
11. Husem, M., “The Effects of Bond Strengths between Lightweight and Ordinary Aggregate-Mortar, Aggregate-Cement Paste on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete,” Materials Science and Engineering A, V. 363, No. 1-2, 2003, pp. 152-158. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00595-110.1016/S0921-5093(03)00595-1 ↗
12. Boháč, M., and Gregerová, M., “The Influence of Blast-Furnace Slag Hydration Products on Microcracking of Concrete,” Materials Characterization, V. 60, No. 7, 2009, pp. 729-734. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2008.11.01110.1016/j.matchar.2008.11.011 ↗
13. Sáez del Bosque, I. F.; Zhu, W.; Howind, T.; Matías, A.; Sánchez de Rojas, M. I.; and Medina, C., “Properties of Interfacial Transition Zones (ITZs) in Concrete Containing Recycled Mixed Aggregate,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 81, 2017, pp. 25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.04.01110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.04.011 ↗
14. Vargas, P.; Restrepo-Baena, O.; and Tobón, J. I., “Microstructural Analysis of Interfacial Transition Zone (ITZ) and its Impact on the Compressive Strength of Lightweight Concretes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 137, 2017, pp. 381-389. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.10110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.101 ↗
15. Yoo, D.-Y.; Kang, S.-T.; Lee, J.-H.; and Yoon, Y.-S., “Effect of Shrinkage Reducing Admixture on Tensile and Flexural Behaviors of UHPFRC Considering Fiber Distribution Characteristics,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 54, 2013, pp. 180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.09.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2013.09.006 ↗
16. EN 12390-3:2009, “Testing Hardened Concrete – Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens,” 2009.
17. Graybeal, B., and Davis, M., “Cylinder or Cube: Strength Testing of 80 to 200 MPa (11.6 to 29 ksi) Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 105, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2008, pp. 603-609.10.14359/20202 ↗
18. EN 12350-2:2009, “Testing Fresh Concrete – Part 2: Slump-Test,” 2009.
19. EN 12350-8:2010, “Testing Fresh Concrete – Part 8: Self-Compacting Concrete – Slump-Flow Test,” 2010.
20. Ewamy, B. D., and Sherman, D. J., “The Application of Chemical Staining Techniques to the Study of Diagenesis in Limestones,” Proceedings of the Geological Society of London, V. 1599, 1962, pp. 102-103.
21. Bonaccorsi, E.; Merlino, S.; and Kampf, A. R., “The Crystal Structure of Tobermorite 14 Å (plombierite), a C-S-H Phase,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 88, No. 3, 2005, pp. 505-512. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00116.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00116.x ↗
22. Gatty, L.; Bonnamy, S.; Feylessoufi, A.; Clinard, C.; Richard, P.; and Van Damme, H., “A Transmission Electron Microscopy Study of Interfaces and Matrix Homogeneity in Ultra-High-Performance Cement-Based Materials,” Journal of Materials Science, V. 36, No. 16, 2001, pp. 4013-4026. doi: 10.1023/A:101793872574810.1023/A:1017938725748 ↗
23. Kong, Y.; Wang, P.; Liu, S.; Zhao, G.; and Peng, Y., “SEM Analysis of the Interfacial Transition Zone between Cement-Glass Powder Paste and Aggregate of Mortar under Microwave Curing,” Materials (Basel), V. 9, No. 9, 2016, p. 733 doi: 10.3390/ma909073310.3390/ma9090733 ↗
24. Courtial, M.; de Noirfontaine, M.-N.; Dunstetter, F.; Signes-Frehel, M.; Mounanga, P.; Cherkaoui, K.; and Khelidj, A., “Effect of Polycarboxylate and Crushed Quartz in UHPC: Microstructural Investigation,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 44, 2013, pp. 699-705. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.07710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.077 ↗