Statistical Comparisons of Creep and Shrinkage Prediction Models Using RILEM and NU-ITI Databases
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Please select a country... Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Overseas Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (the Republic of) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Kosovo, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome And Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St Vincent And Grenadines St. Helena Ascensian and Tristan da Aunh Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis And Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country/Territory is required
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Properties and Behavior · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Al-Manaseer, A., and Lam, J.-P., “Statistical Evaluation of Shrinkage and Creep Models,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 102, No. 3, May-June 2005, pp. 170-176.10.14359/14444 ↗
2. Al-Manaseer, A., and Lakshmikantan, S., “Comparison between Current and Future Design Code Models for Creep and Shrinkage,” Revue francaise de genie civil, J.-A. Calgaro and F. Darve, eds., V. 3, No. 3-4, 1999, pp. 39-59.
3. Bažant, Z. P., and Li, G. H., “Unbiased Statistical Comparison of Creep and Shrinkage Prediction Models,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2008, pp. 610-621.10.14359/20203 ↗
4. Burgoyne, C., and Scantlebury, R., “Lessons Learned from the Bridge Collapse in Palau,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Civil Engineering 161, No. CE 6, Nov. 2008, pp. 28-34.10.1680/cien.2008.161.6.28 ↗
5. Bažant, Z. P.; Yu, Q.; and Li, G. H., “Excessive Long-Time Deflections of Prestressed Box Girders. I: Record-Span Bridge in Palau and Other Paradigms,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 138, No. 6, June 2012, pp. 676-686.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000487 ↗
6. ACI Committee 209, “Guide for Modeling and Calculating Shrinkage and Creep in Hardened Concrete (ACI 209.2R-08),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2008, pp. 8-13.
7. Hassoun, N. M., and Al-Manaseer, A., “Structural Concrete Theory and Design,” fifth edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2012, pp. 15-45.
8. Special Activity Group 5, “Model Code 2010-Final Draft,” fib Bulletin, V. 1, No. 65, 2012, pp. 139-148.
9. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” sixth edition, AASHTO, 2012, pp. 5-15 to 5-17.
10. RILEM Data Bank, provided by Dr. Harald S. Muller, Universitat Karlsruhe (TH), Institute fur Massivbau und Baustofftechnologie, Abteilung Baustofftechnologie, Postfach, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany.
11. Bažant, Z. P., and Li, G.-H., “NU Database of Laboratory Creep and Shrinkage Data,” available for download from www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant.html or from the website of the Infrastructure Technology Institute of Northwestern University http://iti.northwestern.edu, Evanston, IL.
12. Bažant, Z. P., and Li, G. H., “Comprehensive Database on Concrete Creep and Shrinkage,” Infrastructure Technology Institute, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, Mar. 2008, pp. 1-11.