Probability Analysis in Predicting Creep Life of Power Plant Material Using High Power Ultrasound
Source abstract
Abstract
La evaluación no destructiva de los daños en los componentes durante el servicio desempeña un papel importante en la estimación de la vida útil residual de los componentes en servicio. Los métodos convencionales que utilizan características ultrasónicas en la región elástica lineal solo son sensibles a defectos graves. La deformación plástica dependiente del tiempo es la deformación plástica dependiente del tiempo que se produce cuando un material se somete a una carga y temperatura constantes durante un período prolongado. El parámetro ultrasónico no lineal (NLU) es más sensible a los microdaños. Puede ser aplicable para la evaluación de la vida útil restante de los materiales de la planta para evitar paradas no programadas/fallas catastróficas. Se puede desarrollar un modelo predictivo de vida útil restante a partir de los datos de parámetros NLU existentes y se puede validar en cualquier otra muestra de fluencia del mismo material expuesta a cualquier otra condición de prueba.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. A.A. Wahab, 3D Analysis of Creep Void Formation in Steam-Methane Reformer Tubes. PhD. thesis, (University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 2007)
2. T. Sakthivel, S. Panneer Selvi, P. Parameswaran, and K. Laha, Creep Deformation and Rupture Behaviour of Thermal Aged P92 Steel, Mater. High Temp., 2016, 33(1), p 33–43.10.1179/1878641315Y.0000000016 ↗
3. W.G. Seo, J.Y. Suh, A. Singh, J.H. Shim, H. Lee, K. Yoo, and S.H. Choi, Microstructural Evolution of P92 Steel in IN740H/P92 Dissimilar Weld Joints during Creep Deformation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2021, 821, p 141614.10.1016/j.msea.2021.141614 ↗
4. I. Fedorova, A. Belyakov, P. Kozlov, V. Skorobogatykh, I. Shenkova, and R. Kaibyshev, Laves-Phase Precipitates in a Low-Carbon 9% Cr Martensitic Steel during Aging and Creep at 923 K, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 615, p 153–163.10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.046 ↗
5. G. Sposito, C. Ward, P. Cawley, P.B. Nagy, and C. Scruby, A review of Non-Destructive Techniques for the Detection of Creep Damage in Power Plant Steels, NDT E Int., 2010, 43(7), p 555–567.10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.012 ↗
6. K.Y. Jhang and K.C. Kim, Evaluation of Material Degradation Using Nonlinear Acoustic Effect, Ultrasonics, 1999, 37(1), p 39–44.10.1016/S0041-624X(98)00045-6 ↗
7. D.C. Hurley, D. Balzar, P.T. Purtscher, and K.W. Hollman, Nonlinear Ultrasonic Parameter in Quenched Martensitic Steels, J. Appl. Phys., 1998, 83(9), p 4584–4588.10.1063/1.367241 ↗
8. J. Kang, J. Qu, A. Saxena, L. Jacobs, On the detection of creep damage in a directionally solidified nickel base superalloy using nonlinear ultrasound. In AIP Conference Proceedings vol. 700, (American Institute of Physics, 2004) pp. 1248–125510.1063/1.1711760 ↗
9. T. Ohtani, K. Kawashima, M. Drew, and P. Guagliard, Nonlinear Acoustic Evaluation of Creep Damage in Boiler Heat Exchange Tubes, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 2007, 46(7S), p 4577.10.1143/JJAP.46.4577 ↗
10. M. Sahu and S.P. Sagar, A Non-Invasive Technique to Estimate the Onset of Creep Strength Deterioration, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31(2), p 1642–1653.10.1007/s11665-021-06272-4 ↗
11. V. Rathod, O.P. Yadav, A. Rathore, and R. Jain, Probabilistic Modeling of Fatigue Damage Accumulation for Reliability Prediction, J. Quality Reliab. Eng., 2011, 2011, 718901. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/71890110.1155/2011/718901 ↗
12. D. Ling, Research on Weibull Distribution and Its Applications in Mechanical Reliability Engineering [Dissertation thesis]. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. (2010)
13. A.A. Ameen and U.A. Akkash, 2021 Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Bayesian Estimation of Three-Parameter Weibull Distribution Based on Interval-Censored Data, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1818, 1, p 012199.
14. W.A.N.G. Tianshuai, H.E. Xiaofan, W.A.N.G. Jinyu, and L.I. Yuhai, Detail Fatigue Rating Method Based on Bimodal Weibull Distribution for DED Ti-65 Al-2Zr-1Mo-1V Titanium Alloy, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(4), p 281–291.10.1016/j.cja.2021.05.008 ↗
15. W. Weibull, A Statistical Theory of the Strength of Material, Ingeniors Vetenskapa Acad. Handligar, 1939, 151, p 1–45.
16. B.K. Choudhary, W.G. Kim, M.D. Mathew, J. Jang, T. Jayakumar, and Y.H. Jeong, On the Reliability Assessment of Creep Life for Grade 91 Steel, Procedia Eng., 2014, 86, p 335–341.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.046 ↗
17. H. Rinne, The Weibull Distribution: a Handbook, Chapman and Hall/CRC, United Kingdom, 2008.10.1201/9781420087444 ↗
18. C.D. Lai, L. Zhang, and M. Xie, Mean Residual Life and Other Properties of Weibull Related Bathtub Shape Failure Rate Distributions, Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng., 2004, 11(02), p 113–132.10.1142/S0218539304001397 ↗
19. S.J. Wu Reliability Analysis Using the Least Squares Method in Nonlinear Mixed-Effect Degradation Models. (The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dissertations Publishing 1996) p. 9627093
20. M. Sivapragash, P.R. Lakshminarayanan, R. Karthikeyan, K. Raghukandan and M. Hanumantha, Fatigue Life Prediction of ZE41A Magnesium Alloy Using Weibull Distribution, Mater. Des., 2008, 29(8), p 1549–1553.10.1016/j.matdes.2008.01.001 ↗
21. S.J. Kim, Y.S. Kong, Y.J. Roh, and W.G. Kim, Statistical Properties of Creep Rupture Data Distribution for STS304 Stainless Steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 483, p 529–532.10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.153 ↗
22. M. Evans, and A.R. Ward, Statistical and Probabilistic Modelling of Uniaxial Creep Life of a Ti-6246 Alloy, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2000, 16(10), p 1149–1157.10.1179/026708300101507073 ↗
23. M. Sahu, A. Ghosh, J. Kumar, S.N. Singh, and S.P. Sagar, Weibull Parameter Based Probability Distribution for Predicting Creep Life of Power Plant Materials: A Non-Destructive Approach, Mater. Today Proc., 2022, 59, p 1111–1118.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.024 ↗
24. K.H. Matlack, J.Y. Kim, L.J. Jacobs, and J. Qu, Review of Second Harmonic Generation Measurement Techniques for Material State Determination in Metals, J. Non-destructive Eval., 2015, 34(1), p 1–23.
25. J.D. Kalbfleisch, and R.L. Prentice, The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, Wiley, London, 2011.
26. V. Sklenička, K. Kuchařová, P. Král, M. Kvapilová, M. Svobodová, and J. Čmakal, The Effect of Hot Bending and Thermal Ageing on Creep and Microstructure Evolution in Thick-Walled P92 Steel Pipe, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 644, p 297–309.10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.072 ↗
27. X. Wu, W. Beres, and S. Yandt, Challenges in Life Prediction of Gas Turbine Critical Components, Can. Aeronaut Space J., 2008, 54(2), p 31–39.10.5589/q08-005 ↗
28. O. Prat, J. Garcia, D. Rojas, G. Sauthoff, and G. Inden, The Role of Laves Phase on Microstructure Evolution and Creep Strength of Novel 9% Cr Heat Resistant Steels, Intermetallics, 2013, 32, p 362–372.10.1016/j.intermet.2012.08.016 ↗
29. M.K. Sahu, C. Dutta, A. Ghosh, S.P. Sagar, A Digital Image Processing Tool for Size and Number Density Distribution of Precipitates in Creep-Exposed Material. In Soft Computing for Problem Solving (Springer, Singapore, 2019) pp. 653–65910.1007/978-981-13-1592-3_51 ↗
30. E.E. Underwood, Quantitative Metallography, ASM Int. ASM Handbook, 1985, 9, p 123–134.
31. A. Hikata, and C. Elbaum, Generation of Ultrasonic Second and Third Harmonics Due To Dislocations, I. Phys. Rev., 1966, 144(2), p 469.10.1103/PhysRev.144.469 ↗
32. G.E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, Mc Graw Hill Book, New York, 1986.
33. D.C. Wallace, Thermoelasticity of Stressed Materials and Comparison of Various Elastic Constants, Phys. Rev., 1967, 162(3), p 776.10.1103/PhysRev.162.776 ↗
34. J.H. Cantrell, Crystalline Structure and Symmetry Dependence of Acoustic Nonlinearity Parameters, J. Appl. Phys., 1994, 76(6), p 3372–3380.10.1063/1.357463 ↗