Impact Response of a Composite Structural Battery in Low-Velocity Tests
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The tuning of the structural batteries for various applications of transportation is an ambitious target. The pollutant emission and mostly the process for battery recycling and recovery are peculiar aspects to consider for new designs. The goal is to reduce the weight. In this frame, taking into account that the traditional battery packs do not contribute to the structural performance, it is worth to underline the solution of the structural batteries allows to increase the mechanical properties as they are integrated into the primary structure. The paper establishes the response of a composite structural battery model subjected to low-velocity impact tests. The process used to manufacture the structural battery model is described, and the experimental activities are performed by a customized drop tower and finally replicated numerically by explicit code to enhance the comprehension of the structural dynamics. Differences with respect to a carbon fiber laminate are highlighted both for the force released at the impact and dart displacement, for the same levels of energy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. H. Schefer, L. Fauth, T.H. Kopp, R. Mallwitz, J. Friebe, and M. Kurrat, Discussion on Electric Power Supply Systems for All Electric Aircraft, IEEE Access, 2020, 8, p 84188–84216.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991804 ↗
2. M. Zackrisson, C. Jönsson, W. Johannisson, K. Fransson, S. Posner, D. Zenkert, and G. Lindbergh, Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of A Structural Battery, Sustainability, 2019, 11(20), p 5679.10.3390/su11205679 ↗
3. C.E. Riboldi, L. Trainelli, and F. Biondani, Structural Batteries in Aviation: A Preliminary Sizing Methodology, J. Aerosp. Eng., 2020, 33(4), p 04020031.10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001144 ↗
4. M. Yildiz, Initial Airworthiness Requirements for Aircraft Electric Propulsion, Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 2022, 94(8), p 1357–1365.10.1108/AEAT-08-2021-0238 ↗
5. D. Carlstedt and L.E. Asp, Performance Analysis Framework for Structural Battery Composites in Electric Vehicles, Compos. B Eng., 2020, 186, p 107822.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107822 ↗
6. T.J. Adam, G. Liao, J. Petersen, S. Geier, B. Finke, P. Wierach, A. Kwade, and M. Wiedemann, Multifunctional Composites for Future Energy Storage in Aerospace Structures, Energies, 2018, 11(2), p 335.10.3390/en11020335 ↗
7. H. Kühnelt, A. Beutl, F. Mastropierro, F. Laurin, S. Willrodt, A. Bismarck, M. Guida, and F. Romano, Structural Batteries for Aeronautic Applications—State of the Art, Research Gaps and Technology Development Needs, Aerospace, 2021, 9(1), p 7.10.3390/aerospace9010007 ↗
8. N. Ihrner, W. Johannisson, F. Sieland, D. Zenkert, and M. Johansson, Structural Lithium Ion Battery Electrolytes Via Reaction Induced Phase- Separation, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5(48), p 25652–25659.10.1039/C7TA04684G ↗
9. W. Johannisson, N. Ihrner, D. Zenkert, M. Johansson, D. Carlstedt, L.E. Asp, and F. Sieland, Multifunctional Performance of A Carbon Fiber UD Lamina Electrode for Structural Batteries, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2018, 168, p 81–87.10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.044 ↗
10. A. Javaid and M.Z. Ali, Multifunctional Structural Lithium ion Batteries for Electrical Energy Storage Applications, Mater. Res. Express, 2018, 5(5), p 055701.10.1088/2053-1591/aabeb1 ↗
11. W. Johannisson, D. Zenkert, and G. Lindbergh, Model of A Structural Battery and Its Potential for System Level Mass Savings, Multifunct. Mater., 2019, 2(3), p 035002.10.1088/2399-7532/ab3bdd ↗
12. M. Tariq, A.I. Maswood, C.J. Gajanayake, and A.K. Gupta, Aircraft Batteries: Current Trend Towards More Electric Aircraft, IET Electr. Syst. Trans., 2017, 7(2), p 93–103.10.1049/iet-est.2016.0019 ↗
13. J. Rohacs and D. Rohacs, Conceptual Design Method Adapted to Electric/Hybrid Aircraft Developments, Int. J. Sustain. Aviation, 2019, 5(3), p 175–189.10.1504/IJSA.2019.103498 ↗
14. J. Heelan, E. Gratz, Z. Zheng, Q. Wang, M. Chen, D. Apelian, and Y. Wang, Current and Prospective Li-Ion Battery Recycling and Recovery Processes, JOM, 2016, 68(10), p 2632–2638.10.1007/s11837-016-1994-y ↗
15. L. Gaines, K. Richa, and J. Spangenberger, Key Issues for Li-ion Battery Recycling, MRS Energy Sustain., 2018, 5, p E14.10.1557/mre.2018.13 ↗
16. R. Sommerville, P. Zhu, M.A. Rajaeifar, O. Heidrich, V. Goodship, and E. Kendrick, A Qualitative Assessment of Lithium Ion Battery Recycling Processes, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2021, 165, p 105219.10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105219 ↗
17. L. Gaines, Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Processes: Research Towards A Sustainable Course, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 2018, 17, p e00068.
18. Y. Abdel-Nasser, A.M. Elhewy, and I. Al-Mallah, Impact Analysis of Composite Laminate Using Finite Element Method, Ships Offshore Struct., 2017, 12(2), p 219–226.10.1080/17445302.2015.1131005 ↗
19. M. Guida, Validity and Applicability of the Scaling Effects for Low Velocity Impact on Composite Plates, Materials, 2021, 14(19), p 5884.10.3390/ma14195884 ↗
20. ASTM International, ASTM D7136, 2017: Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop-Weight Impact Event (2017)
21. M. Guida, F. Marulo, F.Z. Belkhelfa, and P. Russo, A Review of the Bird Impact Process and Validation of the SPH Impact Model for Aircraft Structure, Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 2022, 129, p 100787.10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100787 ↗
22. Q. Zhao, W. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Hou, J. Li, and C. Li, Multiscale Modeling Framework to Predict the Low-Velocity Impact and Compression After Impact Behaviors of Plain Woven CFRP Composites, Compos. Struct., 2022, 299, p 116090.10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116090 ↗
23. Z. Wang, M. Zhao, K. Liu, K. Yuan, and J. He, Experimental Analysis and Prediction of CFRP Delamination Caused by Ice Impact, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2022, 273, p 108757.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108757 ↗
24. K. Kaware, M. Kotambkar, A. Sontakkey, and N. Talekar, Finite Element Analysis of CFRP Composite Under Low Velocity Impact to Improve the Impact Strength, Int. J. Crashworthiness, 2022 https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2022.212317810.1080/13588265.2022.2123178 ↗
25. P. Ladpli, R. Nardari, F. Kopsaftopoulos, and F.K. Chang, Multifunctional Energy Storage Composite Structures with Embedded Lithium-Ion Batteries, J. Power Sour., 2019, 414, p 517–529.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.051 ↗
26. L.E. Asp, M. Johansson, G. Lindbergh, J. Xu, and D. Zenkert, Structural Battery Composites: A Review, Funct. Compos. Struct., 2019, 1(4), p 042001.10.1088/2631-6331/ab5571 ↗
27. D. Marcelli, J. Summers, and B. Neudecker, LIBACORE II: Power storage in primary structures. in 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA (2002)10.2514/6.2002-1242 ↗
28. B.J. Neudecker, M.H. Benson, and B.K. Emerson, Power fibers: Thin-film batteries on fiber substrates, ITN Energy Systems Inc Littleton Co., Littleton, 2003.10.21236/ADA511230 ↗
29. J.F. Snyder, R.H. Carter, and E.D. Wetzel, Electrochemical and Mechanical Behavior in Mechanically Robust Solid Polymer Electrolytes for Use in Multifunctional Structural Batteries, Chem. Mater., 2007, 19(15), p 3793–3801.10.1021/cm070213o ↗
30. J. Xu, G. Lindbergh, and J. Varna, Multiphysics Modeling of Mechanical and Electrochemical Phenomena in Structural Composites for Energy Storage: Single Carbon Fiber Micro-Battery, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2018, 37(10), p 701–715.10.1177/0731684418760207 ↗
31. D. Carlstedt, W. Johannisson, D. Zenkert, P. Linde, and L.E. Asp, Conceptual design framework for laminated structural battery composites. in Proceedings 18th European Conference on Composite Materials, Athens, Greece (pp. 24–8) (2018)
32. P. Russo, I. Papa, V. Pagliarulo, and V. Lopresto, Polypropylene/Basalt Fabric Laminates: Flexural Properties and Impact Damage Behavior, Polymers, 2020, 12(5), p 1079.10.3390/polym12051079 ↗