Integrating GLL-Weibull Distribution Within a Bayesian Framework for Life Prediction of Shape Memory Alloy Spring Undergoing Thermo-mechanical Fatigue
Source abstract
Abstract
The present paper tackles an important but unmapped problem of the reliability estimations of smart materials. First, an experimental setup is developed for accelerated life testing of the shape memory alloy (SMA) springs. Generalized log-linear Weibull (GLL-Weibull) distribution-based novel approach is then developed for SMA spring life estimation. Applied stimulus (voltage), elongation and cycles of operation are used as inputs for the life prediction model. The values of the parameter coefficients of the model provide better interpretability compared to artificial intelligence based life prediction approaches. In addition, the model also considers the effect of operating conditions, making it generic for a range of the operating conditions. Moreover, a Bayesian framework is used to continuously update the prediction with the actual degradation value of the springs, thereby reducing the uncertainty in the data and improving the prediction accuracy. In addition, the deterioration of material with number of cycles is also investigated using thermogravimetric analysis and scanning electron microscopy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. J.M. Jani, M. Leary, A. Subic, and M.A. Gibson, A Review of Shape Memory Alloy Research, Applications and Opportunities, Mater. Des., 2014, 56, p 1078-111310.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084 ↗
2. O.W. Bertacchini, D.C. Lagoudas, and E. Patoor, Fatigue Life Characterization of Shape Memory Alloys Undergoing Thermomechanical Cyclic Loading, Smart Struct. Mater. Int. Soc. Opt. Photon., 2003, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.50820710.1117/12.508207 ↗
3. G. Eggeler, E. Hornbogen, A. Yawny, A. Heckmann, and M. Wagner, Structural and Functional Fatigue of NiTi Shape Memory Alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 378(1), p 24-3310.1016/j.msea.2003.10.327 ↗
4. P. Pappas, D. Bollas, J. Parthenios, V. Dracopoulos, and C. Galiotis, Transformation Fatigue and Stress Relaxation of Shape Memory Alloy Wires, Smart Mater. Struct., 2007, 16(6), p 2560-257010.1088/0964-1726/16/6/060 ↗
5. C.N. Saikrishna, K.V Ramaiah, B. Vidyashankar, and S.K. Bhaumik, Functional Fatigue in NiTi Shape Memory Alloy Wires—A Comparative Study. In: National Conference on Smart Materials Structures and Systems, National Aerosapce Laboratories, 2012, p 1-6.
6. P. Kundu, S. Chopra, and B.K. Lad, Multiple Failure Behaviors Identification and Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Ball Bearings, J. Intell. Manuf., 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1357-8 .10.1007/s10845-017-1357-8 ↗
7. A. Mettas and P. Vassiliou, Modeling and Analysis of Time-Dependent Stress Accelerated Life Data. In: Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE, 2002, p 343-348. https://doi.org/10.1109/rams.2002.981665 .10.1109/rams.2002.981665 ↗
8. V. Bagdonavicius and M. Nikulin, Accelerated Life Models : Modeling and Statistical Analysis, Chapman & Hall, London, 2002
9. N. Morgan, The Stability of NiTi Shape Memory Alloys and Actuator Applications, Cranfield University, 1999.
10. A.W. Coats and J.P. Redfern, Thermogravimetric Analysis. A Review, Analyst, 1053, 1963(88), p 906. https://doi.org/10.1039/an963880090610.1039/an9638800906 ↗
11. C.E. Ebeling, An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004
12. A. Heng, S. Zhang, A.C.C. Tan, and J. Mathew, Rotating Machinery Prognostics: State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2009, 23(3), p 724-73910.1016/j.ymssp.2008.06.009 ↗
13. P. Kundu, S. Chopra, and B.K. Lad, Development of a Risk Based Maintenance Strategy to Optimize Forecast of a Gas Turbine Failures, Int. J. Perform. Eng., 2015, 11(5), p 407-416