Adapting Metamaterial Structures for a New Generation of Bone Substitute Scaffolds with the Desired Stiffness and Permeability: A Finite Element Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigated the design of bone replacement scaffolds using metamaterial structures with finite element analysis. On this basis, four scaffolds with metamaterial architecture, namely Chiral, Chiral-Truss, Re-entrant, and QSH, each with five different porosities of 70, 75, 80, 85, and 90%, were designed, and a total of 20 models were obtained. Given that the mechanical characteristics, especially the stiffness of a scaffold for bone, play an essential role in its success, the elastic modulus of the models was investigated in this study. The effective elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio were calculated using the finite elements method. The scaffold material was selected as titanium alloy, and the models showed an effective elastic modulus between 1 and 15 GPa. Another aspect of a scaffold design is its permeability and fluid flow modality. The permeability of the designed scaffolds was calculated by performing a CFD analysis using Darcy's law. The computed permeability was in 1.3-25x10-9m2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$1.3-25{\times 10}<^>{-9}{m}<^>{2}$$\end{document} intervals. Moreover, the average fluid flow-induced wall shear stress in the scaffolds was determined, and the results showed that its magnitude depended on the scaffold architecture and porosity. The elastic modulus results indicated the success of the models in satisfying the human bone stiffness requirements. Also, the permeability results of the models were consistent with those reported for human trabecular bone. This study investigated a scaffold design using the metamaterial features comprehensively from both stiffness and fluid flow modality aspects at the same time. The outcomes of this study shed light on the design and development of new scaffolds with metamaterial properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. M. Montorsi, G.G. Genchi, D. De Pasquale, G. De Simoni, E. Sinibaldi, and G. Ciofani, Design, fabrication, and characterization of a multimodal reconfigurable bioreactor for bone tissue engineering, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2022, 119, p 1965–1979.10.1002/bit.28100 ↗
2. J.E. Pc, M.T. Sultan, C.P. Selvan, S. Irulappasamy, F. Mustapha, A.A. Basri et al., Manufacturing challenges in self-healing technology for polymer composites—a review, J. Mater. Res. Technol.., 2020, 9, p 7370–7379.10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.082 ↗
3. D. Ali, M. Ozalp, S.B. Blanquer, and S. Onel, Permeability and fluid flow-induced wall shear stress in bone scaffolds with TPMS and lattice architectures: A CFD analysis, Eur. J. Mech. -B/Fluids., 2020, 79, p 376–385.10.1016/j.euromechflu.2019.09.015 ↗
4. J. Fan, X. Jia, Y. Huang, B.M. Fu, and Y. Fan, Greater scaffold permeability promotes growth of osteoblastic cells in a perfused bioreactor, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 2015, 9, p E210–E218.10.1002/term.1701 ↗
5. G. Yu, Z. Li, S. Li, Q. Zhang, Y. Hua, H. Liu et al., The select of internal architecture for porous Ti alloy scaffold: a compromise between mechanical properties and permeability, Mater. Des., 2020, 192, 108754.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108754 ↗
6. A.M.N. Azammi, S.M. Sapuan, M.R. Ishak, and M.T.H. Sultan, Physical and damping properties of kenaf fibre filled natural rubber/thermoplastic polyurethane composites, Defence Technol.., 2020, 16, p 29–34.10.1016/j.dt.2019.06.004 ↗
7. N.H. Mostafa, Z. Ismarrubie, S. Sapuan, and M. Sultan, Effect of equi-biaxially fabric prestressing on the tensile performance of woven E-glass/polyester reinforced composites, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2016, 35, p 1093–1103.10.1177/0731684416638553 ↗
8. S.D. Salman, Z. Leman, M.T. Sultan, M.R. Ishak, and F. Cardona, Ballistic impact resistance of plain woven kenaf/aramid reinforced polyvinyl butyral laminated hybrid composite, BioResources, 2016, 11, p 7282–7295.10.15376/biores.11.3.7282-7295 ↗
9. S.S. Chee, M. Jawaid, M.T.H. Sultan, O.Y. Alothman, and L.C. Abdullah, Effects of nanoclay on physical and dimensional stability of Bamboo/Kenaf/nanoclay reinforced epoxy hybrid nanocomposites, J. Market. Res., 2020, 9, p 5871–5880.
10. M. Mariam, M. Afendi, M.S. Abdul Majid, M.J.M. Ridzuan, A.I. Azmi, and M.T.H. Sultan, Influence of hydrothermal ageing on the mechanical properties of an adhesively bonded joint with different adherends, Compos. B Eng., 2019, 165, p 572–585.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.032 ↗
11. L. Ai and X.L. Gao, Metamaterials with negative Poisson’s ratio and non-positive thermal expansion, Compos. Struct., 2017, 162, p 70–84.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.056 ↗
12. H.S. Kavakli and D. Ali, Enhancing the mechanical properties of auxetic metamaterials by incorporating nonrectangular cross sections into their component rods: a finite element analysis, Physica status solidi (b)., 2023, 260(3), p 2200194.10.1002/pssb.202200194 ↗
13. M. Kadic, T. Bückmann, N. Stenger, M. Thiel, and M. Wegener, On the practicability of pentamode mechanical metamaterials, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2012, 100, 191901.10.1063/1.4709436 ↗
14. B. Haghpanah, L. Salari-Sharif, P. Pourrajab, J. Hopkins, and L. Valdevit, Multistable shape-reconfigurable architected materials, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28, p 7915–7920.10.1002/adma.201601650 ↗
15. R. Hedayati, M.J. Mirzaali, L. Vergani, and A.A. Zadpoor, Action-at-a-distance metamaterials: distributed local actuation through far-field global forces, APL Mater., 2018, 6, 036101.10.1063/1.5019782 ↗
16. Z. Ding, O. Weeger, H.J. Qi, and M.L. Dunn, 4D rods: 3D structures via programmable 1D composite rods, Mater. Des., 2018, 137, p 256–265.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.004 ↗
17. P. Subramani, S. Rana, B. Ghiassi, R. Fangueiro, D.V. Oliveira, P.B. Lourenco et al., Development and characterization of novel auxetic structures based on re-entrant hexagon design produced from braided composites, Compos. B Eng., 2016, 93, p 132–142.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.058 ↗
18. Y. Zhang, L. Sun, X. Ren, X.Y. Zhang, Z. Tao, and X.Y. Min, Design and analysis of an auxetic metamaterial with tuneable stiffness, Compos. Struct., 2022, 281, 114997.10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114997 ↗
19. J.-H. Oh, J.-S. Kim, V.H. Nguyen, and I.-K. Oh, Auxetic graphene oxide-porous foam for acoustic wave and shock energy dissipation, Compos. B Eng., 2020, 186, 107817.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107817 ↗
20. A Alderson KL Alderson 2007 Auxetic materials Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 221 pp 565 57510.1243/09544100JAERO185 ↗
21. A.D. Tadesse, O.P. Acharya, and S. Sahu, Application of metamaterials for performance enhancement of planar antennas: A review, Int. J. RF Microwave Comput. Aided Eng., 2020, 30, e22154.10.1002/mmce.22154 ↗
22. G. Hu, L. Tang, A. Banerjee, and R. Das, Metastructure with piezoelectric element for simultaneous vibration suppression and energy harvesting, J. Vib. Acoustics., 2016, 139(1), 011012.10.1115/1.4034770 ↗
23. C. Wang, Z. Vangelatos, C.P. Grigoropoulos, and Z. Ma, Micro-engineered architected metamaterials for cell and tissue engineering, Mater. Today Adv.., 2022, 13, 100206.10.1016/j.mtadv.2022.100206 ↗
24. H.M.A. Kolken, S. Janbaz, S.M.A. Leeflang, K. Lietaert, H.H. Weinans, and A.A. Zadpoor, Rationally designed meta-implants: a combination of auxetic and conventional meta-biomaterials, Mater. Horiz., 2018, 5, p 28–35.10.1039/C7MH00699C ↗
25. M.S. Hashemi, A. McCrary, K.H. Kraus, and A. Sheidaei, A novel design of printable tunable stiffness metamaterial for bone healing, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2021, 116, 104345.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104345 ↗
26. Y. Lu and Y. Wang, Structural optimization of metamaterials based on periodic surface modeling, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2022, 395, 115057.10.1016/j.cma.2022.115057 ↗
27. Y. Yao, L. Wang, J. Li, S. Tian, M. Zhang, and Y. Fan, A novel auxetic structure based bone screw design: tensile mechanical characterization and pullout fixation strength evaluation, Mater. Des., 2020, 188, 108424.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108424 ↗
28. T. Li, Y. Chen, X. Hu, Y. Li, and L. Wang, Exploiting negative Poisson’s ratio to design 3D-printed composites with enhanced mechanical properties, Mater. Des., 2018, 142, p 247–258.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.034 ↗
29. L.L. Hu, M.Z. Zhou, and H. Deng, Dynamic crushing response of auxetic honeycombs under large deformation: theoretical analysis and numerical simulation, Thin-Walled Structures., 2018, 131, p 373–384.10.1016/j.tws.2018.04.020 ↗
30. L. Wang and H.-T. Liu, Parameter optimization of bidirectional re-entrant auxetic honeycomb metamaterial based on genetic algorithm, Compos. Struct., 2021, 267, 113915.10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113915 ↗
31. X. Su, Y. Yang, D. Xiao, and Z. Luo, An investigation into direct fabrication of fine-structured components by selective laser melting, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2013, 64, p 1231–1238.10.1007/s00170-012-4081-8 ↗
32. Y. Yang, G. Wang, H. Liang, C. Gao, S. Peng, L. Shen et al., Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds, Int. J. Bioprinting., 2019, 5, p 148.10.18063/ijb.v5i1.148 ↗
33. A. Rahbari, H. Montazerian, E. Davoodi, and S. Homayoonfar, Predicting permeability of regular tissue engineering scaffolds: scaling analysis of pore architecture, scaffold length, and fluid flow rate effects, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin., 2017, 20, p 231–241.10.1080/10255842.2016.1215436 ↗
34. V. Karageorgiou and D. Kaplan, Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis, Biomaterials, 2005, 26, p 5474–5491.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
35. S. Wang, L. Liu, K. Li, L. Zhu, J. Chen, and Y. Hao, Pore functionally graded Ti6Al4V scaffolds for bone tissue engineering application, Mater. Des., 2019, 168, 107643.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107643 ↗
36. J.Y. Cho, W. Xu, M. Brandt, and M. Qian, Selective laser melting-fabricated Ti-6Al-4V alloy: microstructural inhomogeneity, consequent variations in elastic modulus and implications, Opt. Laser Technol., 2019, 111, p 664–670.10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.052 ↗
37. P. Vossenberg, G.A. Higuera, G. van Straten, C.A. van Blitterswijk, and A.J.B. van Boxtel, Darcian permeability constant as indicator for shear stresses in regular scaffold systems for tissue engineering, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 2009, 8, p 499.10.1007/s10237-009-0153-6 ↗
38. X. Xue, M.K. Patel, M. Kersaudy-Kerhoas, M.P.Y. Desmulliez, C. Bailey, and D. Topham, Analysis of fluid separation in microfluidic T-channels, Appl. Math. Model., 2012, 36, p 743–755.10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.009 ↗
39. D. Egger, M. Fischer, A. Clementi, V. Ribitsch, J. Hansmann, and C. Kasper, Development and characterization of a parallelizable perfusion bioreactor for 3D cell culture, Bioengineering, 2017, 4, p 51.10.3390/bioengineering4020051 ↗
40. Gooch JW. Hagen-Poiseuille Equation. In: Gooch JW, editor. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Polymers. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2011. p. 355-.10.1007/978-1-4419-6247-8_5752 ↗
41. S. Gómez, M.D. Vlad, J. López, and E. Fernández, Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Acta Biomater., 2016, 42, p 341–350.10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.032 ↗
42. C. Shi, N. Lu, Y. Qin, M. Liu, H. Li, and H. Li, Study on mechanical properties and permeability of elliptical porous scaffold based on the SLM manufactured medical Ti6Al4V, PLoS ONE, 2021, 16, e0247764.10.1371/journal.pone.0247764 ↗
43. S. Ma, Q. Tang, X. Han, Q. Feng, J. Song, R. Setchi et al., Manufacturability, mechanical properties, mass-transport properties and biocompatibility of triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) porous scaffolds fabricated by selective laser melting, Mater. Des., 2020, 195, 109034.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109034 ↗
44. S. Truscello, G. Kerckhofs, S. Van Bael, G. Pyka, J. Schrooten, and H. Van Oosterwyck, Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study, Acta Biomater., 2012, 8, p 1648–1658.10.1016/j.actbio.2011.12.021 ↗
45. R. Voronov, S. VanGordon, V.I. Sikavitsas, and D.V. Papavassiliou, Computational modeling of flow-induced shear stresses within 3D salt-leached porous scaffolds imaged via micro-CT, J. Biomech., 2010, 43, p 1279–1286.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.007 ↗
46. A.C. Marin and D. Lacroix, The inter-sample structural variability of regular tissue-engineered scaffolds significantly affects the micromechanical local cell environment, Interface Focus., 2015, 5, p 8.
47. M Losertová V Kubeš 2017 Microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V alloy IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 266 pp 01200910.1088/1757-899X/266/1/012009 ↗
48. N. Karathanasopoulos, F. Dos Reis, M. Diamantopoulou, and J.F. Ganghoffer, Mechanics of beams made from chiral metamaterials: Tuning deflections through normal-shear strain couplings, Mater. Des., 2020, 189, 108520.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108520 ↗
49. H. Jiang, H. Ziegler, Z. Zhang, S. Atre, and Y. Chen, Bending behavior of 3D printed mechanically robust tubular lattice metamaterials, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 50, 102565.
50. Z. Jia, F. Liu, X. Jiang, and L. Wang, Engineering lattice metamaterials for extreme property, programmability, and multifunctionality, J. Appl. Phys., 2020, 127, 150901.10.1063/5.0004724 ↗
51. Z.-Y. Zhang, J. Li, H.-T. Liu, and Y.-B. Wang, Novel 2D arc-star-shaped structure with tunable poisson’s ratio and its 3D configurations, Mater. Today Commun., 2022, 30, 103016.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.103016 ↗
52. C. Daish, R. Blanchard, K. Gulati, D. Losic, D. Findlay, D.J.E. Harvie et al., Estimation of anisotropic permeability in trabecular bone based on microCT imaging and pore-scale fluid dynamics simulations, Bone Rep., 2017, 6, p 129–139.10.1016/j.bonr.2016.12.002 ↗
53. M.R. Dias, P.R. Fernandes, J.M. Guedes, and S.J. Hollister, Permeability analysis of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, J. Biomech., 2012, 45, p 938–944.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.019 ↗
54. A. Rahbari, H. Montazerian, E. Davoodi, and S. Homayoonfar, Predicting permeability of regular tissue engineering scaffolds: scaling analysis of pore architecture, scaffold length, and fluid flow rate effects, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng., 2017, 20, p 231–241.10.1080/10255842.2016.1215436 ↗
55. J. Santos, T. Pires, B.P. Gouveia, A.P.G. Castro, and P.R. Fernandes, On the permeability of TPMS scaffolds, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2020, 110, 103932.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103932 ↗
56. F.H. Zhao, T.J. Vaughan, and L.M. McNamara, Quantification of fluid shear stress in bone tissue engineering scaffolds with spherical and cubical pore architectures, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 2016, 15, p 561–577.10.1007/s10237-015-0710-0 ↗
57. D.Q. Li, T.T. Tang, J.X. Lu, and K.R. Dai, Effects of flow shear stress and mass transport on the construction of a large-scale tissue-engineered bone in a perfusion bioreactor, Tissue Eng. Part A, 2009, 15, p 2773–2783.10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0540 ↗
58. A.L. Olivares, È. Marsal, J.A. Planell, and D. Lacroix, Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 2009, 30, p 6142–6149.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.041 ↗
59. F. Zhao, T.J. Vaughan, and L.M. McNamara, Multiscale fluid-structure interaction modelling to determine the mechanical stimulation of bone cells in a tissue engineered scaffold, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 2015, 14, p 231–243.10.1007/s10237-014-0599-z ↗