Surface Characterization and Electrochemical Behavior of AISI 316l Stainless Steel Machined with Green Supercritical CO2 Coolant
Source abstract
Abstract
Cutting fluids are usually applied during milling to reduce the friction and to protect the tool and the material from corrosion. These fluids are associated with toxicity and environmental problems. Moreover, the waste management of cutting fluids entail large expenses. The need to reduce cutting fluids has fostered the use of alternative coolants such as supercritical (sc) CO2, alone or with minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). sc CO2 and sc CO2+MQL coolants have been studied for face milling of a cold worked (CW) AISI 316L stainless steel (SS), evaluating their effect on the residual stresses generated in the surface, in the outermost microstructure of this material, and the corrosion performance. Furthermore, they are compared with those caused by traditional face milling and with a manually ground-generated surface. Ultrafine grain (UFG) layers of about 1 μm and passive layers (of similar chemical compositions) are identified for all the surfaces under study. The three milling processes under study generate a deformation layer under the UFG layer that does not appear below ground surfaces. Moreover, the pre-existent compressive stresses created by the CW process change into tensile, being higher for the alternative green machining processes than for the traditional one. The probability of undergoing pitting (studied with cyclic polarisation curves) appears to be linked to the nature and structure of the passive layer (characterised by Auger spectroscopy and Mott-Schottky analyses, respectively). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) studies also confirm similar electrochemical performances for all analysed surfaces. The active to passive transitions of the SS, which have been characterised by electrochemical potentiodynamic reactivation (EPR) tests, appear to be related to the stresses and deformation state of the deformed layers. Passivation on the alloy in acid media appears to be favoured after the sc CO2 and sc CO2+MQL alternative milling processes than after traditional face milling and grinding.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Wang, Y. Hu, K. Fang, W. Zhang and X. Wang, Effect of Surface Machining on the Corrosion Behaviour of 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel in Simulated PWR Water, Corros. Sci., 2017, 126, p 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.06.01910.1016/j.corsci.2017.06.019 ↗
2. G. Monrrabal, A. Bautista, S. Guzman, C. Gutierrez and F. Velasco, Influence of the Cold Working Induced Martensite on the Electrochemical Behavior of AISI 304 Stainless Steel Surfaces, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2019, 8, p 1335–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.10.00410.1016/j.jmrt.2018.10.004 ↗
3. M.D. Alomar, Occupational Skin Disease from Cutting Fluids, Dermatol. Clin., 1994, 12, p 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30158-X10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30158-X ↗
4. E.O. Bennett, Water Based Cutting Fluids and Human Health, Tribol. Int., 1983, 16, p 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-679X(83)90055-510.1016/0301-679X(83)90055-5 ↗
5. K.C. Wickramasinghe, H. Sasahara, E. Abd Rahim and G.I.P. Perera, Green Metalworking Fluids for Sustainable Machining Applications: A Review, J. Clean. Prod., 2020, 257, p 120552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12055210.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120552 ↗
6. L. Proud, N. Tapoglou and T. Slatter, A Review of CO2 Coolants for Sustainable Machining, Metals, 2022, 12, p 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1202028310.3390/met12020283 ↗
7. M. Jamil, W. Zhao, N. He, M.K. Gupta, M. Sarikaya, A.M. Khan, M.R. Sanjay, S. Siengchin and D.Y. Pimenov, Sustainable Milling of Ti–6Al–4V: A Trade-Off Between Energy Efficiency, Carbon Emissions and Machining Characteristics under MQL and Cryogenic Environment, J. Clean. Prod., 2021, 281, 125374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12537410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125374 ↗
8. S. Debnath, M.M. Reddy and Q.S. Yi, Environmental Friendly Cutting Fluids and Cooling Techniques in Machining: A Review, J. Clean. Prod., 2014, 83, p 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.07110.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.071 ↗
9. R.B. Gupta and J. Shim, Solubility in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006.10.1201/9781420005998 ↗
10. K.K. Wika, P. Litwa and C. Hitchens, Impact of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cooling with Minimum Quantity Lubrication on Tool Wear and Surface Integrity in the Milling of AISI 304L Stainless Steel, Wear, 2019, 426–427(Part B), p 1691–1701.10.1016/j.wear.2019.01.103 ↗
11. Y. Yuan, C. Wang, J. Yang, L. Zheng and X. Weiqiang, Performance of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (scCO2) Mixed with Oil-on-Water (OoW) Cooling in High-Speed Milling of 316L Stainless Steel, Procedia CIRP, 2018, 77, p 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.30110.1016/j.procir.2018.08.301 ↗
12. S. Ghosh and V. Kain, Microstructural Changes in AISI 304L Stainless Steel Due to Surface Machining: Effect on Its Susceptibility to Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, J. Nucl. Mater., 2010, 403(1–3), p 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.02810.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.028 ↗
13. K.D. Ralston and N. Birbilis, Effect of Grain Size on Corrosion: A Review, Corrosion, 2010, 66, 075005. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.346291210.5006/1.3462912 ↗
14. B.V. Mahesh and R.K. Singh Raman, Role of Nanostructure in Electrochemical Corrosion and High Temperature Oxidation: A Review, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2014, 45A, p 5799–5819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2452-510.1007/s11661-014-2452-5 ↗
15. S.M. Lee, W.G. Lee, Y.H. Kim and H. Jang, Surface Roughness and the Corrosion Resistance of 21Cr Ferritic Stainless Steel, Corros. Sci., 2012, 63, p 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.06.03110.1016/j.corsci.2012.06.031 ↗
16. M.A. Melia, J.G. Duran, J.R. Koepke, D.J. Saiz, B.H. Jared and E.J. Schindelholz, How Build Angle and Post-processing Impact Roughness and Corrosion of Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel, NPJ Mater. Degrad., 2020, 4, p 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-020-00126-510.1038/s41529-020-00126-5 ↗
17. S.M. Alvarez, A. Bautista and F. Velasco, Influence of Strain-Induced Martensite in the Anodic Dissolution of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Acid Medium, Corros. Sci., 2013, 69, p 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.11.03310.1016/j.corsci.2012.11.033 ↗
18. P.M. Ahmedabadi, V. Kain and A. Agrawal, Effect of Plastic Deformation on Passivation Characteristics of Type 304 Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28, p 7036–7046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.02810.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.028 ↗
19. M. Alnajjar, F. Christien, V. Barnier, C. Bosch, K. Wolski, A.D. Fortes and M. Telling, Influence of Microstructure and Manganese Sulfides on Corrosion Resistance of Selective Laser Melted 17–4 PH Stainless Steel in Acidic Chloride Medium, Corros. Sci., 2020, 168, 108585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10858510.1016/j.corsci.2020.108585 ↗
20. R.N. Carvalho, B.C. Rincon Troconis, G. Pioszak, V. Ynciarte and J.R. Scully, Effect of Microstructure on the Pitting Susceptibility of a Martensitic-Ferritic Stainless Steel: A Corrosion-Metallurgical Study, Corros. Sci., 2022, 202, p 110277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11027710.1016/j.corsci.2022.110277 ↗
21. J. Lv, W. Guo, T. Liang and M. Yang, The Effects of Ball Milling Time and Surface Enriched Chromium on Microstructures and Corrosion Resistance of AISI 304 Stainless Steel, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2017, 197, p 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.05.02610.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.05.026 ↗
22. E.C. Paredes, A. Bautista, S.M. Alvarez and F. Velasco, Influence of the Forming Process of Corrugated Stainless Steels on their Corrosion Behaviour in Simulated Pore Solutions, Corros. Sci., 2012, 58, p 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.01010.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.010 ↗
23. C.L. Wu, T. Zhao, S. Zhang, Z.H. Wang, C.H. Zhang and J.L. Tan, Modulating Surface Machining to Optimize Work Hardening and Corrosion Behavior in 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07847-z10.1007/s11665-023-07847-z ↗
24. A.M. Panindre, K.H. Chang, T. Weirich and G.S. Frankel, Syringe Cell for Electrochemical Testing, Corrosion, 2018, 74, p 847–850. https://doi.org/10.5006/284710.5006/2847 ↗
25. J.W. Calderón Hernández, C. de Souza Carvalho Machado, I. Costa and H. Gomes de Melo, Syringe Cell to Avoid Crevice Corrosion on Stainless Steels during Potentiodynamic Polarization Testing, Corrosion, 2021, 77, p 1274–1277. https://doi.org/10.5006/392510.5006/3925 ↗
26. G. Monrrabal, F. Huet and A. Bautista, Electrochemical Noise Measurements on Stainless Steel using a Gelled Electrolyte, Corros. Sci., 2019, 148, p 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.12.00410.1016/j.corsci.2018.12.004 ↗
27. R.I. Revilla, B. Wouters, F. Andreatta, A. Lanzutti, L. Fedrizzi and I. De Graeve, EIS Comparative Study and Critical Equivalent Electrical Circuit (EEC) Analysis of the Native Oxide Layer of Additive Manufactured and Wrought 316L Stainless Steel, Corros. Sci., 2020, 167, 108480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10848010.1016/j.corsci.2020.108480 ↗
28. G. Han, Z. Lu, X. Ru, J. Chen, Q. Xiao and Y. Tian, Improving the Oxidation Resistance of 316L Stainless Steel in Simulated Pressurized Water Reactor Primary Water by Electropolishing Treatment, J. Nucl. Mater., 2015, 467, p 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.09.02910.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.09.029 ↗
29. M. Nasr, E.-G. Ng and M. Elbestawi, Effects of Workpiece Thermal Properties on Machining-Induced Residual Stresses—Thermal Softening and Conductivity, Proc. I. Mech. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2007, 221, p 1387–1400. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM85610.1243/09544054JEM856 ↗
30. X. Jiang, B. Li, L. Wang, Z. Wang and H. Li, An Approach to Evaluate the Effect of Cutting Force and Temperature on the Residual Stress Generation during Milling, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, 87, p 2305–2317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8605-510.1007/s00170-016-8605-5 ↗
31. P.S. Kumar, S.G. Acharyya, S.V. Ramana Rao and K. Kapoor, Distinguishing Effect of Buffing vs. Grinding, Milling and Turning Operations on the Chloride Induced SCC Susceptibility of 304L Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 687, p 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.07910.1016/j.msea.2017.01.079 ↗
32. W. Zhang, K. Fang, Y. Hu, S. Wang and X. Wang, Effect of Machining-Induced Surface Residual Stress on Initiation of Stress Corrosion Cracking in 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Corros. Sci., 2016, 108, p 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2016.03.00810.1016/j.corsci.2016.03.008 ↗
33. A. Turnbull, K. Mingard, J.D. Lord, B. Roebuck, D.R. Tice, K.J. Mottershead, N.D. Fairweather and K. Bradbury, Sensitivity of Stress Corrosion Cracking of Stainless Steel to Surface Machining and Grinding Procedure, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53, p 3398–3415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.06.02010.1016/j.corsci.2011.06.020 ↗
34. G.T. Burstein and P.C. Pistorius, Surface Roughness and the Metastable Pitting of Stainless Steel in Chloride Solutions, Corrosion, 1995, 51, p 380–385. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.329360310.5006/1.3293603 ↗
35. M.B. Leban, C. Mikyška, T. Kosec, B. Markoli and J. Kovač, The Effect of Surface Roughness on the Corrosion Properties of Type AISI 304 Stainless Steel in Diluted NaCl and Urban Rain Solutions, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23, p 1695–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0940-910.1007/s11665-014-0940-9 ↗
36. L. Liu, Y. Li and F. Wang, Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Nanocrystalline Materials—A Review, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2010, 20, p 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1005-0302(10)60001-110.1016/S1005-0302(10)60001-1 ↗
37. A. Bautista, G. Blanco, F. Velasco, A. Gutiérrez, L. Soriano, F.J. Palomares and H. Takenouti, Changes in the Passive Layer of Corrugated Austenitic Stainless Steel of Low Nickel Content Due to Exposure to Simulated Pore Solutions, Corros. Sci., 2009, 51, p 785–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2009.01.01210.1016/j.corsci.2009.01.012 ↗
38. S. Tardio, M.L. Abel Marie-Laure, J.E. Castle, J.F. Watts and R.H. Carr, Comparative Study of the Native Oxide on 316L Stainless Steel by XPS and ToF-SIMS, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 2015, 33, p 05E122. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.492731910.1116/1.4927319 ↗
39. V. Vignal, O. Delrue, O. Heintz and J. Peultier, Influence of the Passive Film Properties and Residual Stresses on the Micro-electrochemical Behavior of Duplex Stainless Steels, Electrochim. Acta, 2010, 55, p 7118–7125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.05010.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.050 ↗
40. T. Li, L. Liu, B. Zhang, Y. Li, F. Yan, N. Tao and F. Wang, Passive Behavior of a Bulk Nanostructured 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel Consisting of Nanometer-Sized Grains with Embedded Nano-twin Bundles, Corros. Sci., 2014, 85, p 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.04.03910.1016/j.corsci.2014.04.039 ↗
41. E.F. Pieretti, S.M. Manhabosco, F.P. Dick, S. Hinder and I. Costa, Localized Corrosion Evaluation of the ASTM F139 Stainless Steel Marked by Laser using Scanning Vibrating Electrode Technique, X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Mott–Schottky Techniques, Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 124, p 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.13710.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.137 ↗
42. Y.E. Firat and A. Peksoz, Efficiency Enhancement of Electrochromic Performance in NiO Thin Film Via Cu Doping for Energy-Saving Potential, Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 295, p 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.16610.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.166 ↗
43. K. Nakaoka, J. Ueyama and K. Ogura, Semiconductor and Electrochromic Properties of Electrochemically Deposited Nickel Oxide Films, J. Electroanal. Chem., 2004, 571, p 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.05.00310.1016/j.jelechem.2004.05.003 ↗
44. S.K. Pradhan, P. Bhuyan, L.R. Bairi and S. Mandal, Comprehending the Role of Individual Microstructural Features on Electrochemical Response and Passive Film Behaviour in Type 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Corros. Sci., 2021, 180, 109187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10918710.1016/j.corsci.2020.109187 ↗
45. R.K. Gupta and N. Birbilis, The Influence of Nanocrystalline Structure and Processing Route on Corrosion of Stainless Steel: A Review, Corros. Sci., 2015, 92, p 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.04110.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.041 ↗
46. A. Fattah-Alhosseini and S. Vafaeian, Comparison of Electrochemical Behavior Between Coarse-Grained and Fine-Grained AISI 430 Ferritic Stainless Steel by Mott–Schottky Analysis and EIS Measurements, J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 639, p 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.14210.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.142 ↗
47. U. Martin, J. Bosch, J. Ress and D.M. Bastidas, Long-Term Stability and Electronic Properties of Passive Film of Lean-Duplex Stainless Steel Reinforcements in Chloride Containing Mortar, Constr. Build. Mater., 2021, 291, 123319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12331910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123319 ↗
48. S.M. Bautista, E.C. Paredes, S.M. Alvarez and F. Velasco, Corrosion Behaviour of Corrugated Lean Duplex Stainless Steels in Simulated Concrete Pore Solutions, Corros. Sci., 2016, 102, p 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.11.03310.1016/j.corsci.2012.11.033 ↗
49. G.J. Brug, A.L.G. Van de Eeden, M. Sluyeters-Rehbach and J.H. Sluyters, The Analysis of Electrode Impedances Complicated by the Presence of a Constant Phase Element, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1984, 175, p 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S002-0728(84)80324-110.1016/S002-0728(84)80324-1 ↗
50. B. Hirschorn, M.E. Orazem, B. Tribollet, V. Vivier, I. Frateur and M. Musiani, Determination of Effective Capacitance and Film Thickness from Constant-Phase-Element Parameters, Electrochim. Acta, 2010, 55, p 6218–6227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.10.06510.1016/j.electacta.2009.10.065 ↗
51. A. Amanov, Effect of Local Treatment Temperature of Ultrasonic Nanocrystalline Surface Modification on Tribological Behavior and Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel 316L Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2020, 398, p 126080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12608010.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126080 ↗
52. S.M. Alvarez, A. Bautista and F. Velasco, Influence of Process Parameters on the Corrosion Resistance of Corrugated Austenitic and Duplex Stainless Steels, Mater. Technol., 2013, 47(3), p 317–321.
53. W. Zeiger, M. Schneider and D. Scharnweber, Corrosion Behaviour of a Nanocrystalline FeA18 Alloy, Nanostruct. Mater., 1995, 6, p 1013–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-9773(95)00234-010.1016/0965-9773(95)00234-0 ↗
54. D. Wang, P. Kijkla, M.A. Saleh, S. Kumseranee, S. Punpruk and T. Gu, Tafel Scan Schemes for Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion of Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2022, 130, p 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.01810.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.018 ↗
55. L. Tian, R. Zheng, C. Yuan, G. Yang, C. Shi, B. Zhang and Z. Zhang, Effect of Grain Size on the Corrosion Behavior of Fully Recrystallized Ultra-Fine Grained 316L Stainless Steel Fabricated by High-Energy Ball Milling and Hot Isostatic Pressing Sintering, Mater Charact, 2021, 174, 110995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.02810.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.028 ↗