Influence of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment Parameters on Microstructure and Residual Stress of Mg5Zn0.2Ca Alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Mg5Zn0.2Ca is a promising alloy for medical tools owing to its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability. This study presents the impact of surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) parameters, explicitly colliding balls velocity (1, 5, and 10 m/s), and surface coverages (500, 1000, and 2000%), on the microstructure, hardness, and residual stress. SMAT forms a layer with a gradient in hardness, crystallite size, and twins. The surface hardness, which ranges between 68 and 118 HV0.05, increases with increased ball velocity and surface coverage. High ball velocity (10 m/s) and surface coverage (2000%) induce high compressive residual stress of about −175.5 MPa at ~600 µm depth. The specimens SMATed with a ball velocity of 5 m/s exhibit the higher surface compressive residual stress for all surface coverages. The maximum compressive residual stress of about −153.5 MPa is observed at the surface for the specimens SMATed at 5 m/s ball velocity and 500% coverage. The overall analysis reveals that the specimen treated at 10 m/s ball velocity and 2000% surface coverage exhibits the most refined grain structure, finely and densely distributed twins, maximum SMAT-induced thickness (~3000 µm), highest surface hardness (~2.1 times the non-SMATed specimen’s hardness), and maximum compressive residual stress.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. T. Zhang, W. Wang, J. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Tang, and K. Wang, A Review on Magnesium Alloys for Biomedical Applications, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 2022, 10, p 953344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.95334410.3389/fbioe.2022.953344 ↗
2. Y. Sun, B. Zhang, Y. Wang, L. Geng, and X. Jiao, Preparation and Characterization of a New Biomedical Mg-Zn-Ca Alloy, Mater. Des., 2012, 34, p 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.05810.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.058 ↗
3. S. Nandy, S.P. Tsai, L. Stephenson, D. Raabe, and S. Zaefferer, The Role of Ca, Al and Zn on Room Temperature Ductility and Grain Boundary Cohesion of Magnesium, J. Magnes. Alloy, 2021, 9(5), p 1521–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.03.00510.1016/j.jma.2021.03.005 ↗
4. P. Makkar, S.K. Sarkar, A.R. Padalhin, B.G. Moon, Y.S. Lee, and B.T. Lee, In Vitro and in Vivo Assessment of Biomedical Mg-Ca Alloys for Bone Implant Applications, J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater., 2018, 16(3), p 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/228080001775035910.1177/2280800017750359 ↗
5. I.P. Nanda, M.H. Hassim, M.H. Idris, M.H. Jahare, S.S. Abdulmalik, and A. Arafat, Mechanical and Degradation Properties of Zinc Adopted Magnesium Alloys for Biomedical Application, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019 https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/602/1/01209410.1088/1757-899X/602/1/012094 ↗
6. P. Jiang, C. Blawert, R. Hou, J. Bohlen, N. Konchakova, and M.L. Zheludkevich, A Comprehensive Comparison of the Corrosion Performance, Fatigue Behavior and Mechanical Properties of Micro-Alloyed MgZnCa and MgZnGe Alloys, Mater. Des., 2020, 185, p 108285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10828510.1016/j.matdes.2019.108285 ↗
7. V.E. Bazhenov, A.V. Li, A.A. Komissarov, A.V. Koltygin, S.A. Tavolzhanskii, V.A. Bautin, O.O. Voropaeva, A.M. Mukhametshina, and A.A. Tokar, Microstructure and Mechanical and Corrosion Properties of Hot-Extruded Mg-Zn-Ca-(Mn) Biodegradable Alloys, J. Magnes. Alloy, 2021, 9(4), p 1428–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2020.11.00810.1016/j.jma.2020.11.008 ↗
8. X. Yao, J. Tang, Y. Zhou, A. Atrens, M.S. Dargusch, B. Wiese, T. Ebel, and M. Yan, Surface Modification of Biomedical Mg-Ca and Mg-Zn-Ca Alloys Using Selective Laser Melting: Corrosion Behaviour, Microhardness and Biocompatibility, J. Magnes. Alloy, 2021, 9(6), p 2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2020.08.01110.1016/j.jma.2020.08.011 ↗
9. T.O. Olugbade, B.O. Omiyale, and O.T. Ojo, Corrosion, Corrosion Fatigue, and Protection of Magnesium Alloys: Mechanisms, Measurements, and Mitigation, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31, p 1707–1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06355-210.1007/s11665-021-06355-2 ↗
10. F.X. Qin, C. Ji, Z.H. Dan, G.Q. Xie, H. Wang, S.I. Yamaura, M. Niinomi, and Y. De Li, Corrosion Behavior of MgZnCa Bulk Amorphous Alloys Fabricated by Spark Plasma Sintering, Acta Metall. Sin., 2016, 29(9), p 793–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-016-0451-9. (English Letters)10.1007/s40195-016-0451-9 ↗
11. X.N. Gu, S.S. Li, X.M. Li, and Y.B. Fan, Magnesium Based Degradable Biomaterials: A Review, Front. Mater. Sci., 2014, 8, p 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-014-0253-910.1007/s11706-014-0253-9 ↗
12. V. Kumar, A. Sharma, S.S. Hosmani, and I. Singh, Effect of Ball Size and Impact Velocity on the Microstructure and Hardness of Surface Mechanical Attrition-Treated 304L Steel: Experiment and Finite Element Simulations, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2022, 120(5–6), p 3251–3267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08978-810.1007/s00170-022-08978-8 ↗
13. Y. Xu, D. Meng, L. Jing, Y. Cheng, J. Jia, and W. Li, Grain Refinement, Texture Evolution, and Tensile Performance Improvement of AZ91D Magnesium Alloy Processed by Multi-Cycle Accumulative Back Extrusion, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2023, 25(4), p 2201084. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20220108410.1002/adem.202201084 ↗
14. S. Anand Kumar, P. Satish Kumar, S. Ganesh Sundara Raman, and T.S.N. Sankara Narayanan, Influence of SMAT Parameters on Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Al-Mg-Si Alloy AA 6061, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2017, 26(4), p 1947–1957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-2612-z10.1007/s11665-017-2612-z ↗
15. M. Kasaeian-Naeini, M. Sedighi, and R. Hashemi, Severe Plastic Deformation (SPD) of Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys and Composites: A Review of Developments and Prospects, J. Magnes. Alloy, 2022, 10, p 938–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.11.00610.1016/j.jma.2021.11.006 ↗
16. G. Chen, J. Gao, Y. Cui, H. Gao, X. Guo, and S. Wu, Effects of Strain Rate on the Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of AZ31B Magnesium Alloy Processed by SMAT, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 735, p 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.14110.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.141 ↗
17. G. Chen, Y. Fu, Y. Cui, J. Gao, X. Guo, H. Gao, S. Wu, J. Lu, Q. Lin, and S. Shi, Effect of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment on Corrosion Fatigue Behavior of AZ31B Magnesium Alloy, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 127, p 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.06.03110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.06.031 ↗
18. M. Duan, L. Luo, and Y. Liu, Microstructural Evolution of AZ31 Mg Alloy with Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment: Grain and Texture Gradient, J Alloys Compd, 2020, 823, p 153691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15369110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153691 ↗
19. C. Chang, S. Yue, W. Li, L. Lu, and X. Yan, Study on Microstructure and Tribological Behavior of the Selective Laser Melted MgZnCa Alloy, Mater. Lett., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13143910.1016/j.matlet.2021.131439 ↗
20. M. Mahmoodi, M. Sedighi, and D.A. Tanner, Investigation of through Thickness Residual Stress Distribution in Equal Channel Angular Rolled Al 5083 Alloy by Layer Removal Technique and x-Ray Diffraction, Mater. Des., 2012, 40, p 516–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.02910.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.029 ↗
21. J.N. Dastgerdi, F. Sheibanian, H. Remes, H.H. Toudeshky, and J. Barton, Influences of Residual Stress, Surface Roughness and Peak-Load on Micro-Cracking: Sensitivity Analysis, Metals, 2021, 11(2), p 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1102032010.3390/met11020320 ↗
22. Q. Chen, W.G. Mao, Y.C. Zhou, and C. Lu, Effect of Young’s Modulus Evolution on Residual Stress Measurement of Thermal Barrier Coatings by x-Ray Diffraction, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2010, 256(23), p 7311–7315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.05.07110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.05.071 ↗
23. C. Rathinasuriyan and V.S.S. Kumar, Experimental Investigation of Weld Characteristics on Submerged Friction Stir Welded 6061-T6 Aluminum Alloy, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 2017, 31(8), p 3925–3933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-0738-410.1007/s12206-017-0738-4 ↗
24. C. Moosbrugger, Engineering Properties of Magnesium Alloys, ASM International, 2017.
25. J. Gao, J. Sharp, D. Guan, W. Rainforth, and L. Todd, New Compositional Design for Creating Tough Metallic Glass Composites with Excellent Work Hardening, Acta Mater., 2015, 86, p 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.05510.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.055 ↗
26. S. Du, K. Yang, M. Li, J.R. Li, Y.P. Ren, Q.Y. Huang, H.C. Pan, and G.W. Qin, Achieving High Strength above 400 MPa in Conventionally Extruded Mg-Ca-Zn Ternary Alloys, Sci. China Technol. Sci., 2022, 65(3), p 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1911-310.1007/s11431-021-1911-3 ↗
27. M. Kavyani, G.R. Ebrahimi, H.R. Ezatpour, and M. Jahazi, Microstructure Refinement, Mechanical and Biocorrosion Properties of Mg-Zn-Ca-Mn Alloy Improved by a New Severe Plastic Deformation Process, J. Magnes. Alloy, 2022, 10(6), p 1640–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2020.11.01310.1016/j.jma.2020.11.013 ↗
28. S. Xia, Y. Liu, D. Fu, B. Jin, and J. Lu, Effect of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment on Tribological Behavior of the AZ31 Alloy, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2016, 32(12), p 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.05.01810.1016/j.jmst.2016.05.018 ↗
29. L. Zhang and Y. Han, Twins Formation and Their Role in Nanostructuring of Zirconium, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 523(1–2), p 130–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.05.05710.1016/j.msea.2009.05.057 ↗
30. N.K. Kumbhar, V. Kumar, D. Singh, and S.S. Hosmani, Gradient Microstructure and Properties of Surface Mechanical Attrition-Treated AZ91D Alloy: An Effect of Colliding Balls Velocity, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20230054910.1002/adem.202300549 ↗
31. X. Chen, C. Liu, Y. Wan, S. Jiang, X. Han, and Z. Chen, Formation of Nanocrystalline AZ31B Mg Alloys via Cryogenic Rotary Swaging, J. Magnes. Alloy, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.11.02110.1016/j.jma.2021.11.021 ↗
32. X. Meng, M. Duan, L. Luo, D. Zhan, B. Jin, Y. Jin, X. Xin Rao, Y. Liu, and J. Lu, The Deformation Behavior of AZ31 Mg Alloy with Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 707, p 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.09.09410.1016/j.msea.2017.09.094 ↗
33. D. Singh, D.A. Basha, L. Wadsö, D. Orlov, Y. Matsushita, A. Singh, and S.S. Hosmani, Evolution of Gradient Structured Layer on AZ91D Magnesium Alloy and Its Corrosion Behaviour, J. Alloys Compd., 2021, 882, p 160659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16065910.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160659 ↗
34. X. Liu and R. Xu, Microstructure Evolution and Thermal Stability of Mg-Sm-Ca Alloy Processed by High-Pressure Torsion, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31(4), p 2644–2652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06433-510.1007/s11665-021-06433-5 ↗
35. C. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Hu, W. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Li, and F. Pan, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Gradient Ultrafine-Grained Mg-Gd-Zr Alloy, J. Mater. Res., 2022, 21, p 3896–3908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.00810.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.008 ↗
36. S.N. Naik and S.M. Walley, The Hall-Petch and Inverse Hall-Petch Relations and the Hardness of Nanocrystalline Metals, J. Mater. Sci., 2020, 55, p 2661–2681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04160-w10.1007/s10853-019-04160-w ↗
37. J.H. Shen, Y.L. Li, and Q. Wei, Statistic Derivation of Taylor Factors for Polycrystalline Metals with Application to Pure Magnesium, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 582, p 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.06.02510.1016/j.msea.2013.06.025 ↗
38. H. Liu, X. Wei, S. Xing, L. Wang, W. Zhu, C. Jiang, V. Ji, and K. Zhan, Effect of Stress Shot Peening on the Residual Stress Field and Microstructure of Nanostructured Mg-8Gd-3Y Alloy, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2021, 10, p 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.08510.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.085 ↗
39. Z. Trojanová, Z. Drozd, P. Lukáč, and J. Džugan, Stress Relaxation Tests: Modeling Issues and Applications in Magnesium Alloys and Composites, J Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-06951-w10.1007/s11665-022-06951-w ↗
40. F. Li, G. Chen, T. Dong, C. Zhu, and K. Chen, Microplastic Deformation Activating Residual Stress Relief for Al Alloy, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2023, 254, p 108446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10844610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108446 ↗
41. J.S. Wang, C.C. Hsieh, H.H. Lai, C.W. Kuo, P.T.Y. Wu, and W. Wu, The Relationships between Residual Stress Relaxation and Texture Development in AZ31 Mg Alloys via the Vibratory Stress Relief Technique, Mater. Charact., 2015, 99, p 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2014.09.01910.1016/j.matchar.2014.09.019 ↗
42. W.Z. Zhuang and G.R. Halford, Investigation of Residual Stress Relaxation under Cyclic Load, Int. J. Fatigue, 2001, 23, p 31–37.10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00132-3 ↗
43. M.X. Yang, R.G. Li, P. Jiang, F.P. Yuan, Y.D. Wang, Y.T. Zhu, and X.L. Wu, Residual Stress Provides Significant Strengthening and Ductility in Gradient Structured Materials, Mater. Res. Lett., 2019, 7(11), p 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2019.163553710.1080/21663831.2019.1635537 ↗
44. A.R. Eivani, H. Vafaeenezhad, H.R. Jafarian, and J. Zhou, A Novel Approach to Determine Residual Stress Field during FSW of AZ91 Mg Alloy Using Combined Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics/Neuro-Fuzzy Computations and Ultrasonic Testing, J. Magnes. Alloy, 2021, 9(4), p 1304–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2020.11.01810.1016/j.jma.2020.11.018 ↗
45. X. Song, W.C. Liu, J.P. Belnoue, J. Dong, G.H. Wu, W.J. Ding, S.A.J. Kimber, T. Buslaps, A.J.G. Lunt, and A.M. Korsunsky, An Eigenstrain-Based Finite Element Model and the Evolution of Shot Peening Residual Stresses during Fatigue of GW103 Magnesium Alloy, Int. J. Fatigue, 2012, 42, p 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.01.01910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.01.019 ↗