Study on the Effect of Impact on the Macro- and Micro-structure of Q345 Steel Plate
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, a steel plate with a three-layer spacing was impacted by reactive fragments flying at a speed of 2.2 km/s. OM, SEM (ECC, EDS), and Vickers Hardness were used to evaluate and analyze the damage characteristics of the second-layer steel plate. Numerical simulation and theoretical analysis were used to discuss and analyze the loading status of the steel plate during the impact process. The results demonstrate that the second layer of Q345 steel exhibits macroscopically significant damage and failure characteristics, such as petal tearing deformation, minor perforation, and a crater near the main center perforation. The temperature produced by the impact is higher than the steel plate`s melting point, and it rapidly drops following the impact.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Y. Yuan, Z. Liu, S. He, C. Ge, Q. Yu, Y. Zheng, and H. Wang, Shock-Induced Reaction Behaviors of Functionally Graded Reactive Material, Defence Technol., 2021, 17(5), p 1687–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2020.09.01010.1016/j.dt.2020.09.010 ↗
2. S. Ren, Q. Zhang, Q. Wu, R. Long, H. Liang, and L. Gong, A Debris Cloud Model for Hypervelocity Impact of the Spherical Projectile on Reactive Material Bumper Composed of Polytetrafluoroethylene and Aluminum, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2019, 130, p 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.04.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.04.011 ↗
3. S. Ren, Q. Zhang, Q. Wu, Y. Xue, K. Zheng, Y. Lu, and H. Liang, Influence of Impact-Induced Reaction Characteristics of Reactive Composites on Hypervelocity Impact Resistance, Mater. Des., 2020, 192, p 108722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10872210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108722 ↗
4. Z. Rosenberg and R. Kositski, The Hole Diameter in Metallic Plates Impacted by Hypervelocity Projectiles, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2017, 102, p 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.12.01510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.12.015 ↗
5. B. Bevans, A. Ramalho, Z. Smoqi, A. Gaikwad, T.G. Santos, P. Rao, and J.P. Oliveira, Monitoring and Flaw Detection During Wire-Based Directed Energy Deposition Using In-Situ Acoustic Sensing and Wavelet Graph Signal Analysis, Mater. Des., 2023, 225, p 111480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11148010.1016/j.matdes.2022.111480 ↗
6. J. Shen, R. Gonçalves, Y.T. Choi, J.G. Lopes, J. Yang, N. Schell, H.S. Kim, and J.P. Oliveira, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Gas Metal Arc Welded Cocrfemnni Joints Using a 410 Stainless Steel Filler Metal, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2022, 857, p 144025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14402510.1016/j.msea.2022.144025 ↗
7. J. Shen, R. Gonçalves, Y.T. Choi, J.G. Lopes, J. Yang, N. Schell, H.S. Kim, and J.P. Oliveira, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Gas Metal Arc Welded Cocrfemnni Joints Using a 308 Stainless Steel Filler Metal, Scr. Mater., 2023, 222, p 115053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.11505310.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115053 ↗
8. S. Kokare, J.P. Oliveira, T.G. Santos, and R. Godina, Environmental and Economic Assessment of a Steel Wall Fabricated by Wire-Based Directed Energy Deposition, Addit. Manuf., 2023, 61, p 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10331610.1016/j.addma.2022.103316 ↗
9. Z.Q. Duan, S.X. Li, and D.W. Huang, Microstructures and Adiabatic Shear Bands Formed by Ballistic Impact in Steels and Tungsten Alloy, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2003, 26(12), p 1119–1126. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00705.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00705.x ↗
10. Z. Zhang, D.E. Eakins, and F.P.E. Dunne, On the Formation of Adiabatic Shear Bands in Textured HCP Polycrystals, Int. J. Plast., 2016, 79, p 196–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.12.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2015.12.004 ↗
11. D.L. Zou, L. Zhen, C.Y. Xu, and W.Z. Shao, Characterization of Adiabatic Shear Bands in am60b Magnesium Alloy Under Ballistic Impact, Mater. Charact., 2011, 62(5), p 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2011.03.00310.1016/j.matchar.2011.03.003 ↗
12. J. Peirs, W. Tirry, B. Amin-Ahmadi, F. Coghe, P. Verleysen, L. Rabet, D. Schryvers, and J. Degrieck, Microstructure of Adiabatic Shear Bands in ti6al4v, Mater. Charact., 2013, 75, p 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2012.10.00910.1016/j.matchar.2012.10.009 ↗
13. M. Sabzi and M. Farzam, Hadfield Manganese Austenitic Steel: A Review of Manufacturing Processes and Properties, Mater Res. Express, 2019, 6(10), p 1065. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab3ee310.1088/2053-1591/ab3ee3 ↗
14. S.H. Mousavi Anijdan, M. Sabzi, H. Najafi, M. Jafari, A.R. Eivani, N. Park, and H.R. Jafarian, The Influence of Aluminum on Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Wear Performance of fe–14%mn–1.05%c Manganese Steel, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2021, 15, p 4768–4780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.05410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.054 ↗
15. M. Sabzi and S.M. Dezfuli, Post Weld Heat Treatment of Hypereutectoid Hadfield Steel: Characterization and Control of Microstructure, Phase Equilibrium, Mechanical Properties and Fracture Mode of Welding Joint, J Manuf Process, 2018, 34, p 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.06.00910.1016/j.jmapro.2018.06.009 ↗
16. S.H. Mousavi Anijdan, and M. Sabzi, The Effect of Heat Treatment Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties, Precipitation, Fatigue Life, and Fracture Mode of an Austenitic mn Hadfield Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27(10), p 5246–5253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3625-y10.1007/s11665-018-3625-y ↗
17. M. Sabzi, S.M. Far, and S.M. Dezfuli, Effect of Melting Temperature on Microstructural Evolutions, Behavior and Corrosion Morphology of Hadfield Austenitic Manganese Steel in the Casting Process, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2018, 25(12), p 1431–1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-018-1697-110.1007/s12613-018-1697-1 ↗
18. M. Sabzi, A. Obeydavi, and S.H. Mousavi Anijdan, The effect of Joint Shape Geometry on the Microstructural Evolution, Fracture Toughness, and Corrosion Behavior of the Welded Joints of a Hadfield Steel, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., 2019, 26(12), p 1053–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2018.143026810.1080/15376494.2018.1430268 ↗
19. H. Berns, S. Riedner, V. Gavriljuk, Y. Petrov, and A. Weihrauch, Microstructural Changes in High Interstitial Stainless Austenitic Steels due to Ballistic Impact, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528(13–14), p 4669–4675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.06210.1016/j.msea.2011.02.062 ↗
20. H.K. Wang, Z.Z. Li, Z.H. Zhang, Y.Y. He, A.J. Liu, Z.Q. Xu, Y. Tan, and X.W. Cheng, Microstructure Evolution of 6252 Armor Steel Under Hypervelocity Impact, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2022, 170, p 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.10435610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104356 ↗
21. A.G. Odeshi, A.O. Adesola, and A.Y. Badmos, Failure of aa 6061 and 2099 Aluminum Alloys Under Dynamic Shock Loading, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2013, 35, p 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.01510.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.015 ↗
22. E. Avábenská, N. Pizurová, P. Roupcová, A. Chlupová, J. Brajer, J. Foldyna, and O. Schneeweiss, Effect of Shock Wave on Microstructure of Silicon Steel, Surf. Interfaces, 2020, 20, p 100415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2019.10041510.1016/j.surfin.2019.100415 ↗
23. R.W. Armstrong, Constitutive Relations for Slip and Twinning in High Rate Deformations: A Review and Update, J. Appl. Phys., 2021, 130(24), p 245103. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.007591610.1063/5.0075916 ↗
24. W. Wang, H. Zhang, M. Yang, P. Jiang, F. Yuan, and X. Wu, Shock and Spall Behaviors of a High Specific Strength Steel: Effects of Impact Stress and Microstructure, J. Appl. Phys., 2017, 121(13), p 135901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.497934610.1063/1.4979346 ↗
25. D.R. Jones, D.J. Chapman, and D.E. Eakins, A Gas Gun Based Technique for Studying the Role of Temperature in Dynamic Fracture and Fragmentation, J. Appl. Phys., 2013, 114(17), p 173508. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.482886710.1063/1.4828867 ↗
26. A.M. Kaul et al., Damage Growth and Recollection in Aluminum Under Axisymmetric Convergence Using a Helical Flux Compression Generator, J. Appl. Phys., 2014, 115(2), p 23516. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.486141110.1063/1.4861411 ↗
27. J.E. Hammerberg, R. Ravelo, J. Milhans, and T.C. Germann, Large-Scale Atomistic Studies of Sliding Friction in Polycrystalline Aluminum Interfaces, J. Appl. Phys., 2022, 131(16), p 165103. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.008250510.1063/5.0082505 ↗
28. H. Zhang, H. Peng, X. Pei, P. Li, T. Tang, and L. Cai, A Phase-Field Model for Spall Fracture, J. Appl. Phys., 2021, 129(12), p 125903. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.004367510.1063/5.0043675 ↗
29. M.A.N. Dewapriya and R.E. Miller, Molecular Dynamics Study on the Shock Induced Spallation of Polyethylene, J. Appl. Phys., 2022, 131(2), p 25102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.007224910.1063/5.0072249 ↗
30. X. Huang, Z. Ling, and L.H. Dai, Ductile-to-Brittle Transition in Spallation of Metallic Glasses, J. Appl. Phys., 2014, 116(14), p 143503. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.489755210.1063/1.4897552 ↗
31. P. Xie, Y. Wang, T. Shi, X. Wang, C. Hu, J. Hu, and F. Zhang, Damage Evolution and Spall Failure in Copper Under Complex Shockwave Loading Conditions, J. Appl. Phys., 2020, 128(5), p 55111. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.000952110.1063/5.0009521 ↗
32. P.F. Thomason, Ductile Spallation Fracture and the Mechanics of Void Growth and Coalescence Under Shock-Loading Conditions, Acta Mater., 1999, 47(13), p 3633–3646. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00223-210.1016/S1359-6454(99)00223-2 ↗
33. D. Ma, D. Chen, S. Wu, H. Wang, C. Cai, and G. Deng, Dynamic Experimental Verification of Void Coalescence Criteria, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 533, p 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.11.04110.1016/j.msea.2011.11.041 ↗
34. K. Wen, X. Chen, and D. Di, Modeling on the Shock Wave in Spheres Hypervelocity Impact on Flat Plates, Defence Technol., 2019, 15(4), p 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.01.00610.1016/j.dt.2019.01.006 ↗
35. K. Wen and X. Chen, Influence of the Impedance Gradient on the Debris Cloud Produced by Hypervelocity Impact, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2022, 159, p 104034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.10403410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104034 ↗
36. F.Y. Xu, Q.B. Yu, Y.F. Zheng, M.A. Lei, and H.F. Wang, Damage Effects of Double-Spaced Aluminum Plates by Reactive Material Projectile Impact, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2017, 104, p 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.02310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.023 ↗
37. J.F. Liu, Y. Long, C. Ji, and M.S. Zhong, Dynamic Response and Microstructure Evolution of the Finite Steel Target Subjected to High Velocity Impact by Copper Explosively Formed Projectile, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2017, 40(12), p 2141–2151. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1264010.1111/ffe.12640 ↗
38. J.C. Cheng, S. Zhang, Q. Liu, S.J. Ye, S.N. Luo, Y. Cai, and J.Y. Huang, Ballistic Impact Experiments and Modeling on Impact Cratering, Deformation and Damage of 2024–t4 Aluminum Alloy, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2022, 224, p 107312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10731210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107312 ↗
39. M.A. Khan, Y. Wang, G. Yasin, A. Malik, F. Nazeer, W.Q. Khan, H. Zhang, and T. Ahmed, Microstructure Characteristic of Spray Formed 7055 al Alloy Subjected to Ballistic Impact by Two Different Steel Core Projectiles Impact, J. Market. Res., 2019, 8(6), p 6177–6190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.01210.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.012 ↗
40. B.Y. Cao, D.H. Lassila, M.S. Schneider, B.K. Kad, C.X. Huang, Y.B. Xu, D.H. Kalantar, B.A. Remington, and M.A. Meyers, Effect of shock Compression Method on the Defect Substructure in Monocrystalline Copper, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 409(1–2), p 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.06.07610.1016/j.msea.2005.06.076 ↗
41. W.H.C. Gordon and R. Johnson, Frature Characteristics of Three Metals Sujected to Various Strains, Strain Rates, Temperatures and Pressures, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1985, 21(1), p 31–48.10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
42. P. Luo, Z. Wang, C. Jiang, L. Mao, and Q. Li, Experimental Study on Impact-Initiated Characters of w/zr Energetic Fragments, Mater. Des., 2015, 84, p 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.10710.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.107 ↗
43. M. Xu, W. Song, C. Wang, P. Wang, J. Shao, and E. Tang, Theoretical and Experimental Study on the Hypervelocity Impact Induced Microjet from the Grooved Metal Surface, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2021, 156, p 103944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.10394410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103944 ↗
44. D.A. Marques, J.P. Oliveira, and A.C. Baptista, A Short Review on the Corrosion Behaviour of Wire and Arc Additive Manufactured Materials, Metals (Basel), 2023, 13(4), p 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1304064110.3390/met13040641 ↗
45. B. Bhav Singh, G. Sukumar, K. Sivakumar, V. Madhu, and R. Arockia Kumar, A Comparative Study on the Ballistic Performance of High Nitrogen Steel and Rolled Homogeneous Armour Steel Against 7.62 mm ball and 12.7 mm Armour Piercing Projectiles, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 41, p 1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.34510.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.345 ↗
46. M. Qi, C. Luo, H. He, Y. Wang, D. Fan, and S. Yan, Damage Property of Incompletely Spalled Aluminum Under Shock Wave Loading, J. Appl. Phys., 2012, 111(4), p 43506. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.368130110.1063/1.3681301 ↗
47. D.A. Dalton et al., Laser-Induced Spallation of Aluminum and al Alloys at Strain Rates Above 2×106s−1, J. Appl. Phys., 2008, 104(1), p 13526. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.294927610.1063/1.2949276 ↗
48. Q. An, W.Z. Han, S.N. Luo, T.C. Germann, D.L. Tonks, and W.A. Goddard, Left-Right Loading Dependence of Shock Response of (111)//(112) cu Bicrystals: Deformation and Spallation, J. Appl. Phys., 2012, 111(5), p 53525. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.369207910.1063/1.3692079 ↗
49. S. Luo, Q. An, T.C. Germann, and L. Han, Shock-Induced Spall in Solid and Liquid cu at Extreme Strain Rates, J. Appl. Phys., 2009, 106(1), p 13502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.315806210.1063/1.3158062 ↗