journal article·2022-04

Effects of Thickness Offset on the Tube-to-Tube Sheet Expansion Joint Strength: An Experimental Evaluation

R. Yoganathan, N. Siva Shanmugam, Anand Ramanathan

Publisher page

Abstract

Uniform wall thickness all around the circumference is significant to get the right tube–to-tube sheet expansion joint pull-out strength. Thickness offset at the swaged ends of tubes reduces the joint strength and leak-proof characteristics of joints. Apparent wall reduction (%WR) is used to evaluate the expansion joint strength. Hybrid expansion of hydraulic and roller expansion was considered for this study. Hydraulic expansion pressure of 190 MPa, and roller expansion pressure corresponding to 6, 8, 10, and 12%WR were used. This paper focuses on tube thickness offsets of 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mm, microstructure and hardness values of expanded tubes and pull-out force at various %WR. The result shows that the hardness value has a linear relationship with pull-out force up to 12%WR for uniform thickness tubes. Thickness offset tubes` reduction in pull-out force was observed compared to uniform thickness tubes at higher %WR. There are evident severe plastic strain and grain rotation at the thinner sections. Thickness offset of 0.125 mm tubes does not severely affect joint strength when expanded to 12%WR. At 0.25 mm and 0.5 mm thickness offset tubes can safely expand up to 9.5% and 7.8%WR, respectively. Thickness offset above 0.5 mm is not acceptable.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. E.D. Grimison and G.H. Lee, Experimental Investigation of Tube Expanding, Trans. ASME., 1943 Jul, 65(5), p 497–505.
2. Bo-min DI. An Understanding of Design by Analysis-Method Based on Stress Categories of European Standard EN 13445. Pressure Vessel Technology. 2007; 1.
3. Boiler AS. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1989.
4. Jim H. Standards of the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association. The Association; 1999.
5. H. Krips and M. Podhorsky, Hydraulic Expansion—A New Procedure for Fastening Tubes, VGB Kraftswerkstech., 1976, 56(7), p 456–464.
6. S. Yokell, Expanded and Welded-and-Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints, ASME. J Press Vessel Technol, 1992, 114, p 157–165.10.1115/1.2929023 ↗
7. Chaaban, A., Ma, H. and Bazergui, A. Tube-Tubesheet Joint: A Proposed Equation for the Equivalent Sleeve Diameter Used in the Single-Tube Model,1992.10.1115/1.2929006 ↗
8. Allam, M., Chaaban, A. and Bazergui, A. Estimation of Residual Stresses in Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints,1998.10.1115/1.2842230 ↗
9. Jawad, M.H., Clarkin, E.J. and Schuessler, R.E. Evaluation of Tube-to-Tubesheet Junctions,1987.10.1115/1.3264850 ↗
10. Williams, D.K. Comparison of Residual Stresses in the Mechanical Roll Expansion of HX Tubes into TEMA Grooves.2007.10.1115/1.2716426 ↗
11. N. Haneklaus, R. Reuven, C. Cionea, P. Hosemann and P.F. Peterson, Tube Expansion and Diffusion Bonding of 316L Stainless Steel Tube-to-Tube Sheet Joints Using a Commercial Roller Tube Expander, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2016, 1(234), p 27–32.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.03.008 ↗
12. S. Yokell, Appropriate Correlations For assessing Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joint Strength, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 2004, 126(3), p 376–381.10.1115/1.1767176 ↗
13. R. Sui, W. Wang, Y. Liu, D. Li and W. Li, Root Cause Analysis of Stress Corrosion at Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints of a Waste Heat Boiler, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2014, 1(45), p 398–405.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.07.013 ↗
14. Bouzid AH, Kazeminia M. Effect of Reverse Yielding on the Residual Contact Stresses of Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints Subjected to Hydraulic Expansion. In ASME 2015 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference 2015. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.10.1115/PVP2015-45433 ↗
15. Laghzale NE, Bouzid AH. Analytical Modeling of Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints. J Pressure Vessel Technol. 2009;131(1).10.1115/1.3027462 ↗
16. N. Merah, A. Al-Zayer, A. Shuaib and A. Arif, Finite Element Evaluation of Clearance Effect on Tube-to-Tubesheet Joint Strength, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2003, 80(12), p 879–885.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2003.08.007 ↗
17. A.N. Shuaib, N. Merah, M.K. Khraisheh, I.M. Allam and S.S. Al-Anizi, Experimental Investigation of Heat Exchanger Tubesheet Hole Enlargement, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 2003 Feb 1, 125(1), p 19–25.10.1115/1.1533799 ↗
18. A. Al-Aboodi, N. Merah, A.R. Shuaib, Y. Al-Nassar and S.S. Al-Anizi, Modeling the Effects of Initial Tube-Tubesheet Clearance, Wall Reduction and Material Strain Hardening on Rolled Joint Strength, J. Pressure Vessel Technol.., 2008, 130(4), p 041204.10.1115/1.2967809 ↗
19. R. Sui, W. Wang, Y. Liu and Y. Qu, Effects of Austenitic Stainless Steel Tube and Tubesheet Hole Dimensional Deviations on the Hydraulic Expansion Pressure, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2016 Feb, 1(138), p 1–7.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.02.019 ↗
20. H. Ma, H.J. Yu, C.F. Qian, Z.S. Liu and J.X. Zhou, Experimental Study of Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints for Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers, Procedia Eng.., 2015 Jan, 1(130), p 263–274.10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.220 ↗
21. A.H. Bouzid and L. Zhu, A Study of Neighbouring Tube Expansion Effect on the Residual Contact Pressure of Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2018, 1(165), p 185–192.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2018.06.011 ↗
22. M. Allam and A. Bazergui, Axial Strength of Tube-To-Tubesheet Joints: Finite Element and Experimental Evaluations, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 2002, 124(1), p 22–31.10.1115/1.1398555 ↗
23. A. Al-Aboodi, N. Merah, A.N. Shuaib and Y. Al-Nassar, Effects of Friction on Roller Expanded Tube–Tubesheet Joint Strength, Int.J. Mater. Form., 2010, 3(4), p 253–257.10.1007/s12289-010-0686-3 ↗
24. F.F. Fisher and G.J. Brown, Tube Expanding and related subjects, Transaction of ASME., 1954, 75, p 563–584.
25. D. Alexouli, D. Bøjesen, L.R. Bøystrup, C.R. Klose, G.N. Nikolov and K.B. Nielsen, 3D Numerical Model of Tube-Tubesheet Joint Roller Expansion Process, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, 896(1), p 012070.
26. S.B. Madsen, B. Gervang, C.H. Ibsen, A.S. Kristensen, An Improved Numerical Model of the Tube-Tubesheet Joint Rolling Process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2019.
27. S. Yokell, Hybrid Expansion Revisited, 2007.10.1115/1.2748833 ↗
28. , W.R. Kohlpaintner, Calculation of Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints. 1995.10.1115/1.2842086 ↗
29. H.F. Wang, Z.F. Sang, G.E. Widera, The Effect of the Welding on the Residual Contact Stress in the Expanded Zone of Expanded-Welded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints. J. Pressure Vessel Technology. 2011;133(6).10.1115/1.4005252 ↗
30. A.S. Alaboodi, Finite Element Study of the Hybrid Expansion of Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints, Thin-Walled Structures., 2019 Apr, 1(137), p 347–352.10.1016/j.tws.2019.01.025 ↗
31. H. Liao, M. Cai, Q. Jing and K. Ding, Effect of Cold-Rolling on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of an Al-12% Si-0.2% Mg alloy, J. Mater. Eng. Performance., 2011, 20(8), p 1364–9.10.1007/s11665-011-9944-x ↗
32. W.B. Middlebrooks, D.L. Harrod and R.E. Gold, Residual Stresses Associated with the Hydraulic Expansion of Steam Generator Tubing into Tubesheets, Nucl. Eng. Des., 1993, 143(2–3), p 159–169.10.1016/0029-5493(93)90220-4 ↗
33. S. Yokell, ‘Expanded and Welded-and-Expanded Tube-to-Tube Sheet Joints,’ TEMA Technical Committee Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 1991.
34. C.O. Pettersson, M. Holmquist, C. Mårtensson, Tube-to-Tube Sheet Welding and Expansion of the Super Duplex Steel SAF 2507 (UNS S32750) at the Fabrication of Heat Exchangers. In: Proceedings of the Stainless Steels International Congress, Düsseldorf, June 1996 (pp. 3-5).
35. K.D. Salman, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Cold Rolled AISI 1018 Low Carbon Steel, Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 551(1), p 012007.10.1088/1757-899X/551/1/012007 ↗
36. S.A. Akinlabi, E.T. Akinlabi, Microstructural Development during Mechanical Forming of Steel Sheets. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2013 (Vol. 1).
37. N. A. Raji, O. O. Oluwole, Mechanical Properties of Cold-Drawn Low Carbon Steel for Nail Manufacture: Experimental Observation. 2013.10.19026/rjaset.5.5136 ↗
38. B. Li, S.H. Zhang, H.Q. Zhang and G.L. Zhang, Microstructure and Properties of Copper Tube During Three-Roll Planetary Rolling, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2008, 17(4), p 499–505.10.1007/s11665-007-9166-4 ↗
39. N.K. Tewary, S.K. Ghosh, S. Bera, D. Chakrabarti and S. Chatterjee, Influence of Cold Rolling on Microstructure, Texture and Mechanical Properties of Low Carbon High Mn TWIP Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2014, 6(615), p 405–415.10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.088 ↗
40. A. Kalnins, D.P. Updike and S.M. Caldwell, Contact Pressure in Rolled Tube-Tubesheet Joints, Nucl. Eng. Des., 1991, 130(2), p 229–234.10.1016/0029-5493(91)90131-Z ↗