journal article·2021-08

Effects of α–γ–α Phase Transformation on the ∑3 Boundaries in High-Purity Iron

Syed Ejaz Hussain, Weiguo Wang, Xinfu Gu, Yunkai Cui, Ahua Du, Song Chen, Yan Lin

Publisher page

Abstract

Phase transformation is a basic issue in physics, and it has been extensively used to manipulate the microstructure and thus to manipulate the properties of the materials. In present work, the α–γ–α phase transformation was applied to the treatment of a high-purity iron sample. Then an integrated method, which involves electron backscatter diffraction, grain boundary filtration and stereology based five-parameter analysis, was used to characterize the ∑3 grain boundaries in the sample. The results show that both the frequency and the grain boundary inter-connection of ∑3 boundaries were changed after the treatment of the α–γ–α phase transformation. That is the frequency was doubled and the grain boundary inter-connection was changed from its initial multi-components to a single component of {0 1 1}/{0 1 1}. Theoretical analysis based on the crystallography of phase transition suggests that such effects come from the Kurdjumov–Sachs mechanism during the phase transformation from γ to α. Further analysis of crystallography indicates that the ∑3 boundaries with {0 1 1}/{0 1 1} inter-connection have much higher degree of structural ordering compared to the random boundaries. In the view of grain boundary engineering, such ∑3 boundaries are more resistant to the intergranular attacks in the service if the geometrical factors are the most important. Therefore, it is suggested that to further enhance the frequency of the ∑3 boundaries with {0 1 1}/{0 1 1} inter-connection through an optimized treatment of α–γ–α phase transformation would be pertinent to grain boundary engineering of body-centered cubic materials featured with the α–γ–α phase transformation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. T. Watanabe, An Approach to Grain Boundary Design for Strong and Ductile Polycrystal, Res. Mech., 1984, 11, p 47–84.
2. B.L. Adams, S.I. Wright and K. Kunze, Orientation Imaging: The Emergence of a New Microscopy, Metall. Trans., 1993, 24A, p 819–830.10.1007/BF02656503 ↗
3. E. Martin, W. Muhammd, A.J. Detor, I. Spineli, A. Wessman and W. Daniel, “Strain-Annealed” Grain Boundary Engineering Process Investigated in Hastelloy-X, Materialia, 2020, 9, p 100544.10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100544 ↗
4. C.M. Barr, A.C. Leff, R.W. Demott, R.D. Doherty and M.L. Taheri, Unraveling the Origin of Twin Related Domains and Grain Boundary Evolution During Grain Boundary Engineering, Acta Mater., 2018, 144, p 281–291.10.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.007 ↗
5. X.Y. Fang, Z.Y. Liu, M. Tikhonova, A. Belyakov and W.G. Wang, Evolution of Texture and Development of ∑3n Grain Clusters in 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel during Thermal Mechanical Processing, J. Mater. Sci., 2013, 48, p 997–1004.10.1007/s10853-012-6829-9 ↗
6. W.G. Wang, B.X. Zhou, G.S. Rohrer, H. Guo and Z.X. Cai, Textures and Grain Boundary Character Distributions in a Cold Rolled and Annealed Pb-Ca Based Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527, p 3695–3706.10.1016/j.msea.2010.03.081 ↗
7. B. Li and S. Tin, The Role of Deformation Temperature and Strain on Grain Boundary Engineering of Inconel 600, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 603, p 104–113.10.1016/j.msea.2014.02.078 ↗
8. F. Emeis, M. Peterlechner, S.V. Divinski and G. Wilde, Grain Boundary Engineering Parameters for Ultrafine Grained Microstructures: Proof of Principles by a Systematic Composition Variation in the Cu-Ni System, Acta Mater., 2018, 150, p 262–272.10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.054 ↗
9. S.K. Pradhan, T.S. Prithiv and S. Mandal, Through-Thickness Microstructure Evolution During Grain Boundary Engineering Type Thermomechanical Processing and its Implication on Sensitization Behavior in Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Charact., 2017, 134, p 134–142.10.1016/j.matchar.2017.10.014 ↗
10. W.G. Wang, C.H. Cai, G.S. Rohrer, X.F. Gu, Y. Lin, S. Chen and P.Q. Dai, Grain Boundary Inter-Connections in Polycrystalline Aluminum with Random Orientation, Mater. Charact., 2018, 144, p 411–423.10.1016/j.matchar.2018.07.040 ↗
11. W.G. Wang, Y.K. Cui, G.S. Rohrer, C.H. Cai, S. Chen, X.F. Gu and Y. Lin, Grain Boundary Inter-Connections Of ∑5 Boundaries in a High Purity Iron with a Uniform Microstructure, Scr. Mater., 2019, 170, p 62–66.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.05.033 ↗
12. M.L. Kronber and F.H. Wilson, Secondary Recrystallization in Copper, Trans. AIME, 1949, 185, p 501–514.
13. F.X. Fang, K. Zhang, H. Guo, W.G. Wang and B.X. Zhou, Twin-Induced Grain Boundary Engineering in 304 Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 487, p 7–13.10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.075 ↗
14. M. Shimada, H. Kokawa, Z.J. Wang, Y.S. Sato and I. Karibe, Optimization of Grain Boundary Character Distribution for Intergranular Corrosion Resistant 304 Stainless Steel by Twin-Induced Grain Boundary Engineering, Acta Mater., 2002, 50, p 2331–2341.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00064-2 ↗
15. X.Y. Yi, B. Sun, W.H. Gao, X.L. Meng, Z.Y. Gao, W. Cai and L.C. Zhao, Microstructure Evolution and Superelasticity Behavior of Ti-Ni-Hf Shape Memory Alloy Composite with Multi-scale and Heterogeneous Reinforcements, J. Mater. Sci. Tech., 2020, 42, p 113–121.10.1016/j.jmst.2019.09.027 ↗
16. Y.X. Tong, X.M. Fan, A.V. Shuitcev, F. Chen, B. Tian, L. Li and Y.F. Zheng, Effects of Sc Addition and Aging on Microstructure and Martensitic Transformation of Ni-rich NiTiHfSc High Temperature Shape Memory Alloys, J. Alloys Compd., 2020, 845, p 156331.10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156331 ↗
17. A. Sallami, W. Khalil, T. Bouraoui and T.B. Zineb, A Finite-Strain Thermomechanical Behavior Model for Iron-Based Shape Memory Alloys Accounting for Coupling Between Phase Transformation and Plastic Slip, Int. j. Plasticity, 2020, 124, p 96–116.10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.08.006 ↗
18. M. Mehedi, Y.F. Jiang, B. Ma and J.P. Wang, Nitriding and Martensitic Phase Transformation of the Copper and Boron Doped Iron Nitride Magnet, Acta Mater., 2019, 167, p 80–88.10.1016/j.actamat.2019.01.034 ↗
19. T. Lyman, Metals Handbook, 8th Edn, 8th ed. Metallography, Structures and Phase Diagrams, American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1973.
20. V. Randle, Mechanism of Twinning-Induced Grain Boundary Engineering in Low Stacking-Fault Energy Materials, Acta Mater., 1999, 47, p 4187–4196.10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00277-3 ↗
21. T.S. Prithiv, P. Bhuyan, S.K. Pradhan, V.S. Sarma and S. Mandal, A Critical Evaluation on Efficacy of Recrystallization v.s Strain Induced Boundary Migration in Achieving Grain Boundary Engineered Microstructure in a Ni-Based Superalloy, Acta Mater., 2018, 146, p 187–201.10.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.045 ↗
22. T.Y. Hsu, Phase Transformation in Materials, High Education Press, Beijing, 2013.
23. D.G. Brandon, The Structure of High-Angle Grain Boundaries, Acta Met., 1966, 14, p 1479–1484.10.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4 ↗
24. G.S. Rohrer, D.M. Saylor, B.E. Dasher, B.L. Adams, A.D. Rollett and P. Wynblatt, The Distribution of Internal Interfaces in Polycrystals, Z. Metall, 2004, 95, p 197–214.10.3139/146.017934 ↗
25. D.M. Saylor, B.E. Dasher, B.L. Adams and G.S. Rohrer, Measuring the Five-Parameter Grain-Boundary Distribution from Observation of Planar Sections, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2004, 35, p 1981–1989.10.1007/s11661-004-0147-z ↗
26. S.I. Wright and R.J. Larsen, Extracting Twins from Orientation Imaging Microscopy Scan Data, J. Micros., 2002, 205, p 245–252.10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.00992.x ↗
27. G.V. Kurdjumov and G. Sacks, Ueber den Mechanismus der Stahlhaerrtung, Z. Phys., 1930, 64, p 325–343.10.1007/BF01397346 ↗
28. S. Morito, H. Tanaka, R. Konishi, T. Furuhara and T. Maki, The Morphology and Crystallography of Lath Martensite in Fe-C Alloys, Acta Mater., 2003, 51, p 1789–1799.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00577-3 ↗
29. V. Randle, O. Engler, Introduction to Texture Analysis: Macrotexture, Microtexture and Orientatiuon Mapping, Gordon and Breach Science, Amsterdam, 2000.10.1201/9781482287479 ↗
30. G. Palumbo, K.T. Aust, E.M. Lehockey, U. Erb and P. Lin, On a More Restrictive Geometric Criterion For `Special’ CSL Grain Boundaries, Scripta Mater., 1998, 38, p 1685–1690.10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00077-3 ↗
31. S. Ratanaphan, D.L. Olmsted, V.V. Bulatov, E.A. Holm, A.D. Rollett and G.S. Rohrer, Grain Boundary Energies in Body-Centered Cubic Metals, Acta Mater., 2015, 88, p 346–354.10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.069 ↗
32. W. Wang, S. Chen, G.S. Rohrer and W. Chen, The Inter-Connections of ∑3 Boundaries in Pure Iron, Scr. Mater., 2017, 128, p 18–22.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.09.038 ↗
33. Du. Ahua, W. Wang, Gu. Xinfu, S. Chen, Y. Cui, Y. Lin and L. Hong, The Dependence of Precipitate Morphology on the Grain Boundary Types in an Aged Al-Cu Binary Alloy, J. Mater. Sci., 2021, 56, p 781–791.10.1007/s10853-020-05239-5 ↗