journal article·2021-06

Stress–Strain Curve as Extremal of Some Functional

Natalya Ya. Golovina

Publisher page

Abstract

A functional is proposed, the requirement of stationarity of which leads to a differential equation of the second or fourth order with respect to stress as a function of deformation. On the interval of linear and nonlinear elasticity, the spectrum of boundary value problems corresponding to these differential equations is formulated. It is shown that in the nonlinear strain interval, the eigenfunctions of the differential equation are polynomial and power-law similar to the classical Ramberg–Osgood law, which postulates a power-law dependence of strain on stress. For simplicity, this article considers only reversible deformation processes for which the variation formulation reduces to the requirement of stationarity of some functional. Nevertheless, even this simplified formulation allowed a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of deformation beyond the limit of proportionality. In particular, the fact of the successive inclusion of various deformation mechanisms, each of which is determined by a new term in the functional corresponding to this material, can be considered theoretically established. The appearance of a new term in the functional is directly related to the characteristic point on the deformation curve, at which a new mechanism begins to act. As a result, the variation formulation allows one to obtain a theoretical strain curve. This curve satisfies the stationarity requirement of some functional. The theoretical curve was compared with the experimentally obtained tensile curves of materials: steel St3sp (A568M Grade 1023 USA/ASTM), steel 35 (A 682 Grade 1035 USA/ASTM), steel 20 HGR (Grade 900M USA/ASTM), titanium alloy VT6 (Ti-6Al-4V USA/AMS) and aluminum alloy D16 (AA2024 USA/ANSI H35.2) and showed good agreement with the experiment. Thus, a variation model is constructed that allows one to construct the strain curves of various physically nonlinear materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Fire effects on concrete materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. W. Ramberg and W.R. Osgood, Description of Stress–Strain Curves by Three Parameters, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington DC, 1943. (Technical Note No. 902)
2. R. Papirno, Goodness-of-Fit of the Ramberg–Osgood Analytic Stress–Strain Curve to Tensile Test Data, J. Test. Eval., 1982, 10(6), p 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE10264J10.1520/JTE10264J ↗
3. K. Rasmussen, Full-Range Stress–Strain Curves for Stainless Steel Alloys, J. Constr. Steel Res., 2003, 59(1), p 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00018-410.1016/S0143-974X(02)00018-4 ↗
4. H.S. Gao, Modeling Stress Strain Curves for Nonlinear Analysis, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2009, 575–578, p 539–544. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.575-578.53910.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.575-578.539 ↗
5. O. Zhao, B. Rossi, L. Gardner, and B. Young, Behaviour of Structural Stainless Steel Cross-Sections Under Combined Loading—Part I: Experimental Study, Eng. Struct., 2015, 89, p 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.01410.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.014 ↗
6. F. Walport, L. Gardner, E. Real, I. Arrayago, and D.A. Nethercot, Effects of Material Nonlinearity on the Global Analysis and Stability of Stainless Steel Frames, J. Constr. Steel Res., 2019, 152, p 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.04.01910.1016/j.jcsr.2018.04.019 ↗
7. I. Arrayago, E. Real, and L. Gardner, Description of Stress-Strain Curves for Stainless Steel Alloys, Mater. Des., 2015, 87, p 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.00110.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.001 ↗
8. L. Gardner, X. Yun, L. Macorini, and M. Kucukler, Hot-Rolled Steel and Steel-Concrete Composite Design Incorporating Strain Hardening, Structures, 2017, 9, p 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.08.00510.1016/j.istruc.2016.08.005 ↗
9. O. Zhao, B. Rossi, L. Gardner, and B. Young, Behaviour of Structural Stainless Steel Cross-Sections Under Combined Loading–Part II: Numerical Modelling and Design Approach, Eng. Struct., 2015, 89, p 247–25910.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.016 ↗
10. L. Gardner, X. Yun, A. Fieber, and L. Macorini, Steel Design by Advanced Analysis: Material Modeling and Strain Limits, Engineering, 2019, 5(2), p 243–24910.1016/j.eng.2018.11.026 ↗
11. X. Yun and L. Gardner, The Continuous Strength Method for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Non-Slender Tubular Cross-Sections, Eng. Struct., 2018, 175, p 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.07010.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.070 ↗
12. P.A. Belov, S.A. Lurie, M.Yu. Gavrikov, Znanie, Ukraine, Kharkov, 2016, 36(7-1), p 29-36. https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26556225_57368600.pdf
13. P.A. Belov, S.A. Lurie, and M.Y. Gavrikov, Sciences of Europe, Czech Republic, Praha, 2016
14. C. Liu, Smoothing Elastoplastic Stress-Strain Curves Obtained by a Critical Modification of Conventional Models, Int. J. Sol. Struct., 2003, 40(9), p 2121–214510.1016/S0020-7683(03)00025-8 ↗
15. Y. Liang, O. Zhao, Y.L. Long, and L. Gardner, Stainless Steel Channel Sections Under Combined Compression and Minor Axis Bending–Part 2: Parametric Studies and Design, J. Constr. Steel Res., 2019, 152, p 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.03.02810.1016/j.jcsr.2018.03.028 ↗
16. N.Y. Golovina, PhD thesis, Tyumen State Oil and Gas University, 2002, https://perma.cc/53VQ-2L2H (accessed 05 Mar 2019)
17. N.Y. Golovina, and S.Y. Krivosheeva, Research in Area of Longevity of Sylphon Scraies, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 2018, 115, p 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/115/1/01204310.1088/1755-1315/115/1/012043 ↗
18. S. Hertelé, W. De Waele, R. Denys, and M. Verstraete, Full-Range Stress–Strain Behaviour of Contemporary Pipeline Steels: Part I. Model Description, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2012, 92, p 34–4010.1016/j.ijpvp.2012.01.006 ↗
19. R.P. Skelton et al., The Bauschinger Effect, Masing Model and the Ramberg–Osgood Relation for Cyclic Deformation in Metals, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1997, 238, p 377–39010.1016/S0921-5093(97)00465-6 ↗
20. W. Quach and J. Huang, Stress–Strain Models for Light Gauge Steels, Proc. Eng., 2011, 14, p 288–29610.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.035 ↗
21. N.N. Reno and A.K. Safiullina, A Variational Problem for the One-Dimensional Process “Deformation-Stress,” Bull. Kazan Technol. Univ., 2013, 16(6), p 144–145
22. V.F. Gubarev and V.V. Fatenko, Geometric and Variational Methods of Reducing the Order of the Model, Comp. Anal. Probl. Manag. Comput. Sci., 2018, 1, p 38–52
23. V.L. Berdichevsky, Variational Principles of Continuum Mechanics. The Science, Main editorial board of physical and mathematical literature, Moscow, 1983, p 448
24. B. Hu, Y. Jin, and L.Z. Wu, Full-Range Compressive Stress–Strain Curves for Cold-Formed 304 Stainless Steel Circular Hollow Sections After Exposure to Vacuum Brazing, Acta. Mech. Solida Sin, 2018, 31(5), p 557–57210.1007/s10338-018-0055-1 ↗
25. P.A. Belov and N.Y. Golovina, Generalization of the Ramberg-Osgood Model for Elastoplastic Materials, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04422-310.1007/s11665-019-04422-3 ↗
26. A. Mendelson, Plasticity: Theory, and Application, Krieger, Malabar, 1968
27. N.Y. Golovina, The Nonlinear Stress-Strain Curve Model as a Solution of the Fourth Order Differential Equation, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.10425810.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104258 ↗
28. https://www.totalmateria.com/page.aspx?ID=Home&LN=RU