Analysis of Particle Distribution in Milled Al-Based Composites Reinforced by B4C Nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present work, high-energy ball milling was employed to synthesize Al-(5-10 wt.%)B4C nanocomposite. To do this, two sizes of particles of 50 nm as nanoparticles (NPs) and 50 μm as coarse particles (CPs) were used. The morphology and microstructure of the milled powders were characterized using particle size analyzer, SEM, TEM and EDX techniques. It was found that milling time, B4C particles size and their content strongly affect the characteristics of powders during milling process. The breaking and cold welding of powders was recognized as two main competitive actions during the milling process that influence the microstructural evolutions. It was found that the presence of CPs led to the formation of microcracks which promote the fracture process of Al powders. The dominated mechanisms during the fabrication of composites and nanocomposites were discussed. Also, the theoretical issues regarding the changes in morphology and distribution of B4C particles in CPs and NPs are clarified.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. J.W. Kaczmar, K. Pietrzak, and W. Wlosinski, The Production and Application of Metal Matrix Composite Materials, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2000, 106, p 58–6710.1016/S0924-0136(00)00639-7 ↗
2. D.B. Miracle, Metal Matrix Composites—From Science to Technological Significance, Compost. Sci. Technol., 2005, 65, p 2526–254010.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.027 ↗
3. R. Ekici, M.K. Apalak, and M. Yildirim, Indentation Behavior of Functionally Graded Al–SiC Metal Matrix Composites with Random Particle Dispersion, Compost. Part B Eng, 2011, 42, p 1497–150710.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.053 ↗
4. S. Gopalakrishnan and N. Murugan, Production and Wear Characterisation of AA6061 Matrix Titanium Carbide Particulate Reinforced Composite by Enhanced Stir Casting Method, Compost. Part B Eng., 2012, 43, p 302–30810.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.049 ↗
5. T.S. Srivatsan, I.A. Ibrahim, F.A. Mohamed, and E.J. Lavernia, Processing Techniques for Particulate-Reinforced Metal Aluminum Matrix Composites, J. Mater. Sci., 1991, 265, p 965–975
6. V. Domnich, S. Reynaud, R.A. Haber, and M. Chhowalla, Boron Carbide: Structure, Properties, and Stability Under Stress, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2011, 94, p 3605–362810.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04865.x ↗
7. X.G. Chen, R. Hark, Development of Al–30%B4C Metal Matrix Composites for Neutron Absorber Material, ed. by W. Yin, S.K. Das, in Proceedings of aluminum alloys: fabrication, characterization and applications, TMS, 2008, pp. 3–9
8. A. Baradeswaran and A. Elaya Perumal, Influence of B4C on the Tribological and Mechanical Properties of Al 7075–B4C Composites, Compost. Part B-Eng., 2013, 54, p 146–15210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.012 ↗
9. J.M. Torralba, C.E. Costa, and F. Velasco, P/M Aluminum Matrix Composites: An Overview, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2003, 133, p 203–20610.1016/S0924-0136(02)00234-0 ↗
10. J. Onoro, M.D. Salvador, and L.E.G. Cambronero, High-Temperature Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Alloys Reinforced with Boron Carbide Particles, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2009, 499, p 421–42610.1016/j.msea.2008.09.013 ↗
11. A. Yazdani and E. Salahinejad, Evolution of Reinforcement Distribution in Al–B4C Composites During Accumulative Roll Bonding, Mater. Des., 2011, 32, p 3137–314210.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.063 ↗
12. C. Nie, J. Gu, J. Liu, and D. Zhang, Investigation on Microstructures and Interface Character of B4C Particles Reinforced 2024Al Matrix Composites Fabricated by Mechanical Alloying, J. Alloys Compd., 2008, 454, p 118–12210.1016/j.jallcom.2006.12.024 ↗
13. M. Alizadeh, M.H. Paydar, and F. Sharifian Jazi, Structural Evaluation and Mechanical Properties of Nanostructured Al/B4C Composite Fabricated by ARB Process, Compost. Part B-Eng., 2013, 44, p 339–34310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.069 ↗
14. I. Kerti and F. Toptan, Microstructural Variations in Cast B4C-Reinforced Aluminum Matrix Composites (AMCs), Mater. Lett., 2008, 62, p 1215–121810.1016/j.matlet.2007.08.015 ↗
15. J. Abenojar, F. Velasco, and M.A. Martinez, Optimization of Processing Parameters for the Al + 10%B4C System Obtained by Mechanical Alloying, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2007, 184, p 441–44610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.122 ↗
16. C. Suryanarayana, Mechanical Alloying and Milling, Prog. Mater Sci., 2001, 46, p 1–18410.1016/S0079-6425(99)00010-9 ↗
17. M. Abdellahi, H. Bahmanpour, and M. Bahmanpour, The Best Conditions for Minimizing the Synthesis Time of Nanocomposites During High Energy Ball Milling: Modeling and Optimizing, Ceram. Int., 2014, 40(7), p 9675–969210.1016/j.ceramint.2014.02.049 ↗
18. S. Bathula, R.C. Anandani, A. Dhar, and A.K. Srivastava, Microstructural Features and Mechanical Properties of Al 5083/SiCp Metal Matrix Nanocomposites Produced by High Energy Ball Milling and Spark Plasma Sintering, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2012, 545, p 97–10210.1016/j.msea.2012.02.095 ↗
19. L. Lu, M.O. Lai, and W. Liang, Magnesium Nanocomposite Via Mechanochemical Milling, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2004, 64, p 2009–201410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.02.018 ↗
20. A. Santos-Beltrán, R. Goytia-Reyes, H. Morales-Rodriguez, V. Gallegos-Orozco, M. Santos-Beltrán, F. Baldenebro-Lopez, and R. Martínez-Sánchez, Characterization of Al–Al4C3 Nanocomposites Produced by Mechanical Milling, Mater. Charact., 2015, 106, p 368–37410.1016/j.matchar.2015.06.007 ↗
21. K.G. Raghavendra, A. Dasgupta, P. Bhaskar, K. Jayasankar, C.N. Athreya, P. Panda, S. Saroja, V. Subramanya Sarma, and R. Ramaseshan, Synthesis and Characterization of Fe-15 wt.% ZrO2 Nanocomposite Powders by Mechanical Milling, Powder Technol., 2016, 287, p 190–20010.1016/j.powtec.2015.10.003 ↗
22. S.M. Zebarjad and S.A. Sajjadi, Microstructure Evaluation of Al–Al2o3 Composite Produced by Mechanical Alloying Method, Mater. Des., 2006, 27, p 684–68810.1016/j.matdes.2004.12.011 ↗
23. M.A. Taha, A.H. Nassar, and M.F. Zawrah, Effect of Milling Parameters on Sinterability, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2016, 181, p 26–3210.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.06.030 ↗
24. A. Abdollahi, A. Alizadeh, and H.R. Baharvandi, Dry Sliding Tribological Behavior and Mechanical Properties of Al2024–5 wt%B4C Nanocomposite Produced by Mechanical Milling and Hot Extrusion, Mater. Des., 2014, 55, p 471–48110.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.024 ↗
25. A. Alizadeh and E. Taheri-Nassaj, Wear Behavior of Nanostructured Al and Al–B4C Nanocomposites Produced by Mechanical Milling and Hot Extrusion, Tribol. Lett., 2011, 44, p 59–6610.1007/s11249-011-9825-3 ↗
26. T. Varol and A. Canakci, Effect of Particle Size and Ratio of B4C Reinforcement on Properties and Morphology of Nanocrystalline Al2024-B4C Composite Powders, Powder Technol., 2013, 246, p 462–47210.1016/j.powtec.2013.05.048 ↗
27. Y. Li, W. Liu, V. Ortalan, W.F. Li, Z. Zhang, and R. Vogt, HRTEM and EELS Study of Aluminum Nitride in Nanostructured Al 5083/B4C Processed Via Cryomilling, Acta Mater., 2010, 58, p 1732–174010.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.015 ↗
28. Y.E. Jichun, H.E. Jianhong, and M.S. Julie, Cryomilling for the Fabrication of a Particulate B4C Reinforced Al Nanocomposite: Part I. Effects of Process Conditions on Structure, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2006, 37, p 3099–310910.1007/s11661-006-0190-z ↗