Influence of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment Parameters on the Residual Stress of EN8 Steel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. X. Li, L. Lu, J. Li, X. Zhang, and H. Gao, Mechanical Properties and Deformation Mechanisms of Gradient Nanostructured Metals and Alloys, Nat. Rev., 2020, 5, p 706–723.
2. S.C. Cao, X. Zhang, J. Lu, Y. Wang, S.Q. Shi, and R.O. Ritchie, Predicting Surface Deformation During Mechanical Attrition of Metallic Alloys, Npj Comput. Mater., 2019, 5, p 36.10.1038/s41524-019-0171-6 ↗
3. X. Chen, Z. Han, X. Li, and K. Lu, Lowering Coefficient of Friction in Cu Alloys with Stable Gradient Nanostructures, Sci. Adv., 2016, 2, e1601942.10.1126/sciadv.1601942 ↗
4. T. Balusamy, T. S. N. Sankara Narayanan, and H. W. Park, Surface Nanostructuring of Metallic Materials for Implant Applications. In: T. S. Santra, L. Mohan, (eds) Nanomaterials and Their Biomedical Applications. Springer Series in Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Springer, Singapore, 16, 465-511. (2021)10.1007/978-981-33-6252-9_16 ↗
5. T. Balusamy, Sivakumar Bose, T. S. N. Sankara Narayanan, K. Ravichandran, Surface Nanostructuring of Ti Based Alloys for Biomedical Applications—Role of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment. In: Savaş Kaya, Sasikumar Yesudass., (eds), Materials Development and Processing for Biomedical Applications. 1st Edition, CRC Press, p 241-254. (2022)10.1201/9781003173533-17 ↗
6. H. Zhang, S. Wu, N. Ao, J. Zhang, H. Li, L. Zhou, P. Xu, and Y. Su, Fatigue Crack Non-Propagation Behavior of a Gradient Steel Structure from Induction Hardened Railway Axles, Int. J. Fatigue, 2023, 166, 107296.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107296 ↗
7. Z. Wang, X. Wang, H. Huang, J. Gan, Y. Yang, J. He, and M. Shi, Effect of High-Energy Shot Peening on Surface Nanocrystallization and Integrity of AISI 4140 Steel: A Numerical and Experimental Investigation, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30, p 5579–5592.10.1007/s11665-021-05821-1 ↗
8. J. Ding, Z. Shang, J. Li, H. Wang, and X. Zhang, Microstructure and Tensile Behavior of Nanostructured Gradient TWIP steel, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2020, 785, 139346.10.1016/j.msea.2020.139346 ↗
9. N. Kumar, G.P. Chaudhari, and S.R. Meka, Influence of Ultrasonic Shot Peening on Microstructure, Mechanical, and Electrochemical Behaviour 316 of Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 31, p 2364–2380.10.1007/s11665-021-06322-x ↗
10. R. Zhang, R. Chiang, Z. Ren, H. Zhang, W. Zhao, G.-X. Wang, V.K. Vasudevan, Y. Dong, and C. Ye, Fatigue Performance Improvement of 7075-T651 Aluminum Alloy by Ultrasonic Nanocrystal Surface Modification, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31, p 2354–2363.10.1007/s11665-021-06308-9 ↗
11. Y. Yang, K. Zhou, and G. Li, Surface gradient microstructural characteristics and evolution mechanism of 2195 aluminum lithium alloy induced by laser shock peening, Opt. Laser Technol., 2019, 109, p 1–7.10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.041 ↗
12. S. Anand Kumar, P. Satish Kumar, S. Ganesh Sundara Raman, and T.S. Sankara Narayanan, Influence of SMAT Parameters on Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Al-Mg-Si Alloy AA 6061, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2017, 26, p 1947–1957.10.1007/s11665-017-2612-z ↗
13. T. Balusamy, T.S. Narayanan, K. Ravichandran, M.H. Lee, and T. Nishimura, Surface Nanocrystallization of EN8 Steel: Correlation of Change in Material Characteristics with Corrosion Behavior, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2015, 162(6), p C285.10.1149/2.0931506jes ↗
14. T. Balusamy, T.S.N. Sankara Narayanan, K. Ravichandran, M.H. Lee, and T. Nishimura, A Facile Method to Modify the Characteristics and Corrosion Behavior of 304 Stainless Steel by Surface Nanostructuring Toward Biomedical Applications, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 32, p 17731–17747.
15. X. Wang, C. Xu, D. Hu, C. Li, C. Liu, and Z. Tang, Effect of Ultrasonic Shot Peening on Surface Integrity And Fatigue Performance of Single-Crystal Superalloy, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2021, 296, 117209.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117209 ↗
16. T. Balusamy, T.S. Narayanan, K. Ravichandran, I.S. Park, and M.H. Lee, Plasma Nitriding of AISI 304 Stainless Steel: Role of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Mater Charact, 2013, 1(85), p 38–47.10.1016/j.matchar.2013.08.009 ↗
17. T. Balusamy, T.S. Narayanan, and K. Ravichandran, Effect of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment (SMAT) on Boronizing of EN8 Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2012, 1(213), p 221–228.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.051 ↗
18. V. Kumar, M.D. Joshi, C. Pruncu, I. Singh, and S.S. Hosmani, Microstructure and Tribological Response of Selective Laser Melted AISI 316L Stainless Steel: the Role of Severe Surface Deformation, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30, p 5170–5183.10.1007/s11665-021-05730-3 ↗
19. S. Ghosh, N. Bibhanshu, S. Suwas, and K. Chatterjee, Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment of Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel Yields Gradient Nanostructure with Superior Strength and Ductility, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 2021, 820, 141540.10.1016/j.msea.2021.141540 ↗
20. T. Wegener, T. Wu, F. Sun, C. Wang, J. Lu, and T. Niendorf, Influence of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment (SMAT) on Microstructure, Tensile and Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Additively Manufactured Stainless Steel 316L, Metals, 2022, 12, p 1425.10.3390/met12091425 ↗
21. T. Gao, Z. Sun, H. Xue, and D. Retraint, Effect of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment on High Cycle and Very High Cycle Fatigue of a 7075-T6 Aluminium Alloy, Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 139, 105798.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105798 ↗
22. S.A. Kumar, S.G. Raman, and T.S. Narayanan, Influence of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment Duration On Fatigue Lives of Ti-6Al-4V, Trans. Indian Inst. Metals., 2014, 67, p 137–141.10.1007/s12666-013-0322-2 ↗
23. Y. Wang, L. Yuan, S. Zhang, C. Sun, W. Wang, G. Yang, Q. Li, and Y. Wei, The Influence of Combined Gradient Structure with Residual Stress on Crack-Growth Behavior in Medium Carbon Steel, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2019, 209, p 369–381.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.01.037 ↗
24. Z. Li, P. La, and F. Wei, TEM Observation and Strengthening Mechanism of Cementite Nanoparticles of Heterogeneous Structure 1045 Steel, Mater. Res. Express, 2021, 8(8), 086502.10.1088/2053-1591/ac144c ↗
25. D.A. Lesyk, B.N. Mordyuk, S. Martinez, M.O. Iefimov, V.V. Dzhemelinskyi, and A. Lamikiz, Influence of Combined Laser Heat Treatment and Ultrasonic Impact Treatment on Microstructure and Corrosion Behavior of AISI 1045 Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2020, 401, 126275.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126275 ↗
26. D.A. Lesyk, S. Martinez, B.N. Mordyuk, V.V. Dzhemelinskyi, A. Lamikiz, G.I. Prokopenko, M.O. Iefimov, and K.E. Grinkevych, Combining Laser Transformation Hardening and Ultrasonic Impact Strain Hardening for Enhanced Wear Resistance of AISI 1045 Steel, Wear, 2020, 462, 203494.10.1016/j.wear.2020.203494 ↗
27. H. Nykyforchyn, V. Kyryliv, and O. Maksymiv, Wear Resistance of Steels with Surface Nanocrystalline Structure Generated by Mechanical-Pulse Treatment, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2017, 12, p 150.10.1186/s11671-017-1917-z ↗
28. S. Vives, E. Gaffet, and C. Meunier, X-ray Diffraction Line Profile Analysis of Iron Ball Milled Powder, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 366, p 229–238.10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00572-0 ↗
29. S.A. Kumar, S.G. Raman, T.S. Narayanan, and R. Gnanamoorthy, Influence of Counterbody Material on Fretting Wear Behaviour of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treated Ti-6Al-4V, Tribol. Int., 2013, 1(57), p 107–114.10.1016/j.triboint.2012.07.021 ↗
30. T. Lorentzen and T. Leffers, Measurement of Residual and Applied Stress Using Neutron Diffraction, NATO ASI series E, Vol 216, M.T. Hutchings, A.D. Krawitz Ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992, p 253–261
31. M. Franxois, J.M. Sprauel, C.F. Dehan, M.R. James, F. Convert, and J. Lu, Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses. J. Lu Ed., Society for Experimental Mechanics, Lilburn, 1996, p 71–131
32. C.C. Huang, Y.C. Pan, and T.H. Chuang, Effects of Post-Weld Heat Treatments on the Residual Stress and Mechanical Properties of Electron Beam Welded SAE 4130 Steel Plates, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 1997, 6, p 61–68.10.1007/s11665-997-0033-0 ↗
33. W.R. Calado and R. Barbosa, Influence of Carbon Content and Deformation Temperature on Ultra-Grain Refinement of Plain Carbon Steels by Means of Torsion Test, ISIJ Int., 2013, 53, p 909–914.10.2355/isijinternational.53.909 ↗
34. L. Zhou, G. Liu, X.L. Ma, and K. Lu, Strain-Induced Refinement ina Steel with Spheroidal Cementite Subjected to Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Acta Mater., 2008, 56, p 78–87.10.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.003 ↗
35. N.A. Prakash, R. Gnanamoorthy, and M. Kamaraj, Surface Nanocrystallization of Aluminium Alloy by Controlled Ball Impact Technique, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2012, 15(210), p 78–89.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.08.069 ↗
36. M.R. Belbasi and M. Ramezani, The Effect of Sandblasting Time on Producing Nanocrystalline Surface of PO733 Steel (DIN: 1.8509), Mater. Phys. Mech., 2013, 17(1), p 33–37.
37. X. Yong, G. Liu, K. Lu, and J. Lu, Characterization and Properties Of Nanostructured Surface Layer in a Low Carbon Steel Subjected to Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2003, 19, p 1–4.10.1179/mst.2003.19.1.001 ↗
38. Z.B. Wang, N.R. Tao, S. Li, W. Wang, G. Liu, J. Lu, and K. Lu, Effect of Surface Nanocrystallization on Friction and Wear Properties in Low Carbon Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, 352, p 144–149.10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00870-5 ↗
39. T. Balusamy, T.S. Narayanan, K. Ravichandran, I.S. Park, and M.H. Lee, Pack Boronizing of AISI H11 Tool Steel: Role of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Vacuum, 2013, 1(97), p 36–43.10.1016/j.vacuum.2013.04.006 ↗
40. K. Dai and L. Shaw, Comparison Between Shot Peening and Surface Nanocrystallization and Hardening Processes, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, 463, p 46–53.10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.159 ↗
41. W. Pfeiffer and J. Wenzel, Shot Peening of Brittle Materials—Status and Outlook, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2010, 638–642, p 799–804.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.638-642.799 ↗
42. W.Y. Tsai, J.C. Huang, Y.J. Gao, Y.L. Chung, and G.R. Huang, Relationship Between Microstructure and Properties For Ultrasonic Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Scr. Mater., 2015, 103, p 45–48.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.03.003 ↗
43. H.L. Chan, H.H. Ruan, A.Y. Chen and J. Lu, Optimization of the Strain Rate to Achieve Exceptional Mechanical Properties of 304 Stainless Steel Using High Speed Ultrasonic Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Acta Mater., 2010, 58, p 5086–5096.10.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.044 ↗
44. G. Chen, J. Gao, Y. Cui, H. Gao, X. Guo, and S. Wu, Effects of Strain Rate on the Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of AZ31B Magnesium Alloy Processed by SMAT, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 735, p 536–546.10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.141 ↗
45. Q. Lin, H. Liu, C. Zhu, D. Chen, and S. Zhou, Effects of Different Shot Peening Parameters on Residual Stress, Surface Roughness and Cell Size, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2020, 398, 126054.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126054 ↗