Effects of Thermal Laser Shock Peening on Stress Corrosion Susceptibility of 304 Stainless Steel
Source abstract
Abstract
As a new surface strengthening technology, laser shock peening (LSP) can effectively improve the stress corrosion resistance of metal surface. However, the martensitic transformation induced by traditional LSP has negative effects on the corrosion resistance of 304 stainless steel. In order to retard the martensitic transformation, the thermal laser shock peening (TLSP) tests of 304 stainless steel were carried out in this work. The residual stress, grain size, microhardness and martensite content of the surface layer of the specimens were measured. The stress corrosion sensitivity of the TLSP 304 stainless steel was studied by slow strain rate test (SSRT). The results show that high residual compressive stress, grain refinement and martensitic transformation occurred on the surface of the specimens after TLSP, and the martensite content is significantly lower than that of the traditional laser peening specimens. The stress corrosion sensitivity index of the specimens treated by TLSP is significantly lower than that of the untreated specimens. With the increase in the TLSP temperature, the stress corrosion sensitivity index of the specimens decreases, especially when the laser shock peening temperature rises above 50 °C, the stress corrosion sensitivity index decreases significantly.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Erosion and Abrasive Machining · Healthcare and Venom Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. C.S. Liu, Z.Z. Li, and C.F. Chen, Summary of Stress Corrosion Cracking of Stainless Steel, Surf. Technol., 2020, 49, p 1–13. https://doi.org/10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2020.03.00110.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2020.03.001 ↗
2. J. Etienne and R.G. Metcalfe, Stress Corrosion Cracking of Stainless Steel Refractory Anchors Prior to Service, J. Fail. Anal. AndPreven, 2018, 18, p 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0379-z10.1007/s11668-017-0379-z ↗
3. Y. Yang, X. Lian, K. Zhou, and G. Li, Effects of Laser Shock Peening on Microstructures and Properties of 2195 Al-Li Alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 781, p 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.11810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.118 ↗
4. Z. Tong, X. Ren, Y. Ren, F. Dai, and Y. Zhao, Effect of Laser Shock Peening on Microstructure and Hot Corrosion of TC11 Alloy, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2018, 335, p 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.12.00310.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.12.003 ↗
5. B. Starman, H. Hallberg, M. Wallin, M. Ristinmaa, N. Nikolaj, and M. Halilovič, Modelling of the Mechanical Response in 304 Austenitic Steel during Laser Shock Peening and Conventional Shot Peening, Procedia Manuf., 2020, 47, p 450–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.33410.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.334 ↗
6. Z.H. Bu, Study on Corrosion and Mechanical Properties of 301 L Stainless Steel for Vehicle, Lanzhou Univ. Technol., 2021 https://doi.org/10.27206/d.cnki.ggsgu.2021.00079510.27206/d.cnki.ggsgu.2021.000795 ↗
7. L. Zhou, W. He, S. Luo, C. Long, C. Wang, X. Nie, G. He, X. Shen, and Y. Li, Laser Shock Peening Induced Surface Nano-Crystallization and Martensite Transformation in Austenitic Stainless Steel, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 655, p 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.26810.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.268 ↗
8. Z.D. Wang, G.F. Sun, Y. Lu, M.Z. Chen, K.D. Biand, and Z.H. Ni, Microstructural Characterization and Mechanical Behavior of Ultrasonic Impact Peened and Laser Shock Peened AISI 316L Stainless Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2020, 385, p 125403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12540310.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125403 ↗
9. Q.Q. Li, C.J. Miao, F.Q. Xiao, X. Zhang, and J.Y. Zheng, A Study on Some Problems of Strain Strengthening of Austenitic Stainless Steel Pressure Vessels, Zhejiang Univ., 2016 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-257X.2015.11.00410.3969/j.issn.1673-257X.2015.11.004 ↗
10. Z.P. Zhao, Analysis of Temperature Field and Thermal Stress of Metal Target under Millisecond Laser Ablation, Tianjin Univ., 2011 https://doi.org/10.7666/d.Y224253810.7666/d.Y2242538 ↗
11. P.C. Zhang, Strain-Induced Martensite Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel under Warm Deformation, Heat Treat. Met., 2019, 44, p 44–49. https://doi.org/10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2019.02.00910.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2019.02.009 ↗
12. C. Ye, S. Suslov, B.J. Kim, E.A. Stach, and G.J. Cheng, Fatigue Performance Improvement in AISI 4140 Steel by Dynamic Strain Aging and Dynamic Precipitation during Warm Laser Shock Peening, Acta Mater., 2010, 59, p 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.03210.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.032 ↗
13. C. Ye, Y. Liao, and G.J. Cheng, Warm Laser Shock Peening Driven Nanostructures and Their Effects on Fatigue Performance in Aluminum Alloy 6160, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2010, 12, p 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20090029010.1002/adem.200900290 ↗
14. U. Trdan and J. Grum, SEM/EDS Characterization of Laser Shock Peening Effect on Localized Corrosion of Al Alloy in a Near Natural Chloride Environment, Corros. Sci., 2014, 1, p 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.01.03210.1016/j.corsci.2014.01.032 ↗
15. J.Z. Lu, K.Y. Luo, D.K. Yang, X.N. Cheng, J.L. Hu, F.Z. Dai, H. Qi, L. Zhang, J.S. Zhongand, and Q.W. Wang, Effects of Laser Peeningon Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) of ANSI 304 Austeniticstainless Steel, Corros. Sci., 2012, 3, p 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.03.04410.1016/j.corsci.2012.03.044 ↗
16. H. Chen, Y. Zhong, and H. Wang, Research Progress of the Method for Residual Stress Measurement, Yunnan Metall., 2005, 3, p 52–54. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812703415_000410.1142/9789812703415_0004 ↗
17. H. Soyama and A.M. Korsunsky, A Critical Comparative Review of Cavitation Peening and Other Surface Peening Methods, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2022, 305, p 117586–117586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11758610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117586 ↗
18. G. Sudhakar Rao, J.K. Chakravartty, N. Saibaba, G.S. Mahobia, K. Chattopadhyay, N.C. Santhi Srinivas, and V. Singh, Disappearance and Reappearance of Serrated Plastic Flow under Cyclic Loading: A Study Of Dislocation Substructures, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 603, p 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.02.06410.1016/j.msea.2014.02.064 ↗
19. A. Vasu, K. Gobal, and R.V. Grandhi, A Computational Methodology for Determining the Optimum Re-Peening Schedule to Increase the Fatigue Life of Laser Peened Aircraft Components, Int. J. Fatigue, 2015, 70, p 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.07.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.07.008 ↗
20. Y.W. Zhang, Study on the Martensitic Stainless Steel Evolution and Phase Transformation Behavior of 00CR13NI6MO2, Anhui Univ. Technol., 2020 https://doi.org/10.27790/d.cnki.gahgy.2020.00000510.27790/d.cnki.gahgy.2020.000005 ↗
21. I. Nikitin and B. Scholtes, Deep Rolling of Austenitic Steel AISI 304 at Different Temperatures-Near Surface Microstructures and Fatigue, HTM—J. Heat Treat. Mater., 2012, 67(3), p 188–194.10.3139/105.110152 ↗
22. N. Saklakoglu, S. GencalpIrizalp, E. Akmanand, and A. Demir, Near Surface Modification of Aluminum Alloy Induced by Laser Shock Processing, Opt. Laser Technol., 2014, 64, p 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2014.05.02810.1016/j.optlastec.2014.05.028 ↗
23. X. Xing, X. Duan, T. Jiang, J. Wangand, and F. Jiang, Ultrasonic Peening Treatment Used to Improve Stress Corrosion Resistance of AlSi10Mg Components Fabricated Using Selective Laser Melting, Metals, 2019, 9(1), p 103–103. https://doi.org/10.3390/met901010310.3390/met9010103 ↗
24. Y. Lv, H. Luo, J. Tang, J. Guo, J. Piand, and K. Ye, Corrosion Properties of Phase Reversion Induced Nano/Ultrafine Grained AISI 304 Metastable Austenite Stainless Steel, Mater. Res. Bull., 2018, 107, p 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.04.02410.1016/j.materresbull.2018.04.024 ↗
25. S.L. He, Thermo-Mechanical Coupling Corrosion Behavior and Life Prediction of 304 Stainless Steel in Cl-Containing Ionic Water, Harbin Inst. Technol., 2018 https://doi.org/10.27061/d.cnki.ghgdu.2018.00003910.27061/d.cnki.ghgdu.2018.000039 ↗
26. H.S. Klapper, J. Goellner, A. Burkert, and A. Heyn, Environmental Factors Affecting Pitting Corrosion of Type 304 Stainless Steel Investigated by Electrochemical Noise Measurements under Potentiostatic Control, Corros. Sci., 2013, 75, p 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.06.00510.1016/j.corsci.2013.06.005 ↗
27. J.L. Deng, Grey Theoretical Basis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, Wuhan, 2002.
28. Z.J. Zheng, Y. Gao, Y. Gui, and M. Zhu, Corrosion Behaviour of Nanocrystalline 304 Stainless Steel Prepared by Equal Channel Angular Pressing, Corros. Sci., 2012, 54, p 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.08.04910.1016/j.corsci.2011.08.049 ↗
29. G.R. Argade, S.K. Panigrahi, and R.S. Mishra, Effects of Grain Size on the Corrosion Resistance of Wrought Magnesium Alloys Containing Neodymium, Corros. Sci., 2012, 58, p 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.02110.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.021 ↗