Experimental Investigation of Strain-Rate- and Temperature-Dependent Mechanical Properties of SA516Gr.70 Steel and Development of an Appropriate Material Model
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this work is to develop an appropriate strain-rate- and temperature-dependent material constitutive model to simulate plastic deformation behavior of SA516Gr.70 steel in the sub-zero temperature regime (− 128 to 25 °C). For this purpose, tests have been conducted at three different strain rates covering an order of 6 in the rates, i.e., from 0.001 to 1400/s. Tests at high strain rates have been conducted using a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar test setup. The tensile tests have been designed in such a way that the strain rate remains almost constant during the test. A critical comparison of results of both tension and compression high strain-rate tests has been carried out, and the suitability of tensile experiments has been highlighted. A modified Ramberg–Osgood model, with temperature- and strain-rate-dependent parameters, has been presented. The parameters of the new model have been evaluated from a large set of experimental data. It was observed that the yield stress and ultimate tensile strength of the material increase monotonically with decreasing temperature and increasing strain rates. The ductility at fracture and extent of uniform elongation of the specimen decrease for the intermediate strain rate of 0.925 s−1, when compared to the corresponding values at quasistatic rate of loading. At very high rate of loading, ductility increases due to the increased resistance of the material to growth and coalescence of voids. From the comparison of results of model and experiment, it has been observed that the modified material model is able to predict the true stress–strain curve of the material satisfactorily in the sub-zero temperature regime over a wide range of strain rates. The nature of variation of mechanical properties with temperature and strain rate has been explained from the point of view of dislocation-based micromechanism of the plastic deformation process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. P. Verleysen and J. Degrieck, Experimental Investigation of the Deformation of Hopkinson Bar Specimens, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2004, 30(3), p 239–25310.1016/S0734-743X(03)00069-1 ↗
2. T. Chiyatan and V. Uthaisangsuk, Mechanical and Fracture Behavior of High Strength Steels Under High Strain Rate Deformation: Experiments and Modeling, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2020, 779, p 13912510.1016/j.msea.2020.139125 ↗
3. O.S. Lee and M.S. Kim, Dynamic Material Property Characterization by Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) Technique, Nucl. Eng. Des., 2003, 226(2), p 119–12510.1016/S0029-5493(03)00189-4 ↗
4. J.H. Yoon, B.S. Lee, Y.J. Oh, and J.H. Hong, Effects of Loading Rate and Temperature on J-R Fracture Resistance of an SA516-Gr.70 Steel for Nuclear Piping, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 1999, 76(9), p 663–67010.1016/S0308-0161(99)00033-2 ↗
5. J. Qin, R. Chen, X. Wen, Y. Lin, and F. Lu, Mechanical Behaviour of Dual-Phase High-Strength Steel Under High Strain Rate Tensile Loading, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 586, p 62–7010.1016/j.msea.2013.07.091 ↗
6. B. Hopkinson, A Method of Measuring the Pressure Produced in the Detonation of High Explosives or by the Impact of Bullets, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 1914, 213, p 437–456
7. H. Kolsky, An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at Very High Rates of Loading, Proc. Phys. Soc. B, 1949, 62(11), p 676–68410.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
8. E.D.H. Davies and S.C. Hunter, The Dynamic Compression Testing of Solids by the Method of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1963, 11, p 155–17910.1016/0022-5096(63)90050-4 ↗
9. K. Ogawa, Mechanical Behavior of Metals Under Tension-Compression Loading at High Strain Rate, Int. J. Plast., 1985, 1(4), p 347–35810.1016/0749-6419(85)90020-8 ↗
10. M. Kariem, D. Ruan, J. Beynon, and D. Prabowo, Mini Round-Robin Test on the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar, J. Test. Eval., 2017, 46(2), p 457–46810.1520/JTE20160054 ↗
11. M. Kang, J. Park, S.S. Sohn, H.S. Kim, N.J. Kim, and S. Lee, Interpretation of Quasi-static and Dynamic Tensile Behavior by Digital Image Correlation Technique in Twinning Induced Plasticity (TWIP) and Low-Carbon Steel Sheets, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 693, p 170–17710.1016/j.msea.2017.03.076 ↗
12. M. Kang, J. Park, S.S. Sohn, D.-H. Ahn, H.S. Kim, W.T. Cho, K.-G. Chin, and S. Lee, Dynamic Tensile Behavior of Twinning-Induced Plasticity/Low-Carbon (TWIP/LC) Steel Clad Sheets Bonded by Hot Rolling, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 700, p 387–39610.1016/j.msea.2017.06.003 ↗
13. A.S. Hamada, A. Kisko, A. Khosravifard, M.A. Hassan, and D. Porter, Ductility and Formability of Three High-Mn TWIP Steels in Quasi-static and High-Speed Tensile and Erichsen Tests, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2018, 712, p 255–26510.1016/j.msea.2017.11.111 ↗
14. J. Park, M. Kang, S.S. Sohn, S.-H. Kim, and S. Lee, Quasi-static and Dynamic Deformation Mechanisms Interpreted by Microstructural Evolution in Twinning Induced Plasticity (TWIP) Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 684, p 54–6310.1016/j.msea.2016.12.037 ↗
15. M.J. Hadianfard, R. Smerd, S. Winkler, and M. Worswick, Effects of Strain Rate on Mechanical Properties and Failure Mechanism of Structural Al-Mg Alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 492(1–2), p 283–29210.1016/j.msea.2008.03.037 ↗
16. D.-C. Hu, M.-H. Chen, L. Wang, and H. Cheng, Dynamic Tensile Behaviour and Deformational Mechanism of C5191 Phosphor Bronze Under High Strain Rates Deformation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, 649, p 68–7310.1016/j.msea.2015.09.075 ↗
17. S.-T. Chiou, W.-C. Cheng, and W.-S. Lee, The Analysis of the Microstructure Changes of a Fe-Mn-Al Alloy Under Dynamic Impact Tests, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 386(1–2), p 460–46710.1016/S0921-5093(04)01026-3 ↗
18. D.L. Zou, B.F. Luan, Q. Liu, L.J. Chai, and J.W. Chen, Formation and Evolution of Adiabatic Shear Bands in Zirconium Alloy Impacted by Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar, J. Nucl. Mater., 2013, 437(1–3), p 380–38810.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.02.030 ↗
19. S. Sharma, V.M. Chavan, and R.J. Patel, Evaluation of Material Properties of SA516Gr.70 Using Split Hopkinson Bar Technique Under Tensile and Compressive High Strain-Rate Loading, Procedia Eng., 2014, 86, p 123–13010.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.020 ↗
20. M. Sun and J.A. Packer, High Strain Rate Behaviour of Cold-Formed Rectangular Hollow Sections, Eng. Struct., 2014, 62–63, p 181–19210.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.023 ↗
21. W. Ramberg, W.R. Osgood, Description of Stress–Strain Curves by Three Parameters. Technical Note No. 902, National advisory committee for aeronautics, Washington DC, 1943.
22. C.F. Shih and J.W. Hutchinson, Fully Plastic Solutions and Large-Scale Yielding Estimates for Plane Stress Crack Problems, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1976, 98, p 289–29510.1115/1.3443380 ↗
23. V. Kumar, M.D. German, C.F. Shih, An engineering approach for elastic-plastic fracture analysis. EPRI Report NP-1931. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto. CA, 1981.10.2172/6068291 ↗
24. R.A. Ainsworth, The Assessment of Defects in Structures of Strain Hardening Materials, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1984, 19, p 633–64010.1016/0013-7944(84)90096-1 ↗
25. J.W. Hutchinson, Singular Behavior at the End of a Tensile Crack Tip in a Hardening Material, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1968, 16, p 13–3110.1016/0022-5096(68)90014-8 ↗
26. J.R. Rice and G.F. Rosengren, Plane Strain Deformation Near a Crack Tip in a Power-Law Hardening Material, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1968, 16, p 1–1210.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-6 ↗
27. N.P. O’Dowd and C.F. Shih, family of Crack-Tip Fields Characterized by a Triaxiality Parameter-I. Structure of Fields, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1991, 39, p 898–1015
28. W.-S. Lee, C.-F. Lin, and S.-Z. Huang, Effect of Temperature and Strain Rate on the Shear Properties of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy, Proc. IMechE Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2006, 220(2), p 127–13610.1243/09544062C05505 ↗
29. R.W. Armstrong and S.M. Walley, High Strain Rate Properties of Metals and Alloys, Int. Mater. Rev., 2008, 53(3), p 105–12810.1179/174328008X277795 ↗
30. W.-S. Lee and T.-H. Chen, Plastic Deformation and Fracture Characteristics of Hadfield Steel Subjected to High-Velocity Impact Loading, Proc. IMechE Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2002, 216(10), p 971–98210.1243/095440602760400940 ↗
31. J.M. Park, J. Moon, J.W. Bae, M.J. Jang, J. Park, S. Lee, and H.S. Kim, Strain Rate Effects of Dynamic Compressive Deformation on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of CoCrFeMnNi High-Entropy Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2018, 719, p 155–16310.1016/j.msea.2018.02.031 ↗
32. S. Zhang, Z. Wang, H.J. Yang, J.W. Qiao, Z.H. Wang, and Y.C. Wu, Ultra-High Strain-Rate Strengthening in Ductile Refractory High Entropy Alloys Upon Dynamic Loading, Intermetallics, 2020, 121, p 10669910.1016/j.intermet.2020.106699 ↗
33. X. Zhang, C. Zhu, L. Hu, H. Wu, and C. Li, Investigations on Microstructure Evolution of TA1 Titanium Alloy Subjected to Electromagnetic Impact Loading, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2019, 19(3), p 639–64710.1016/j.acme.2019.01.002 ↗