journal article·2012-09

Mechanical Reliability of Devices Subdermally Implanted into the Young of Long-Lived and Endangered Wildlife

Bryan Hori, Royann J. Petrell, Goran Fernlund, Andrew Trites

Publisher page

Abstract

Service data does not exist for the strength of enclosures for subdermally implanted biotelemetry devices intended for young wild animals. Developing adequate tests especially for implants intended for endangered species is difficult due to the very limited availability of live animals and cadaverous tissue, ethical concerns about using them, and high enclosure costs. In this research, these limitations were overcome by taking a conservative approach to design and testing. Reliability tests were developed and performed to establish the likelihood that a thin subdermally and cranially implanted alumina enclosure would fail due to typical external forces related to diving, fights, and falls over the expected 30-year life time of sea lions. Cyclic fatigue tests indicative of deep dives performed out of tissue and at the 90% reliability level indicated no failure after 70,000 stress cycles at stresses of approximately 15 MPa; dynamic fatigue tests indicated a 5% probability of failure at 250 MPa; and puncture tests indicative of fight bites showed a 5% probability of failure at 1500 N. These values were far outside of what the animals might expect to encounter in real life. On the other hand, the response of the enclosure to impact outside of the tissue was failure at a mean energy level of 6.7 J. Modeling results predict that head impacts due to trampling by fighting sea lion males and falls over 1 m onto a rocky ledge typical of haul out environments would likely fracture an infant’s head as well as the implant. The device can be implanted under an impact absorbing 1 cm blubber layer for extra protection. More service data for enclosures can be made more available despite limited availability of test animals if a conservative approach to testing is taken.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Animal testing and alternatives · Morphological variations and asymmetry · Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. A.W. Trites and D. Pauly, Estimating Mean Body Masses of Marine Mammals from Maximum Body Lengths, Can. J. Zool., 1998, 76, p 886–89610.1139/z97-252 ↗
2. National Research Council, The Decline of the Steller Sea Lion in Alaskan Waters: Untangling Food Webs and Fishing Nets, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2003, 204 p
3. B.D. Hori, R.J. Petrell, A.W. Trites, and T. Godbey, Lamination for Subdermal Implant Fixation, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B, 2009, 91B(1), p 17–2510.1002/jbm.b.31369 ↗
4. A. Batchelor and M. Chandrasekaran, Service Characteristics of Biomedical Materials and Implants, World Scientific, River Edge, 200410.1142/p343 ↗
5. P. Wilmshurst, Cardiovascular Problems in Divers, Heart, 1998, 80, p 537–53810.1136/hrt.80.6.537 ↗
6. T. Loughlin, J. Sterling, R. Merrick, J. Sease, and A. York, Diving Behavior of Immature Steller Sea Lions (Eumetopias jubatus), Fish. Bull., 2003, 101, p 566–582
7. B. Mate, Northern (Steller) Sea Lion. In: Mammals in the Seas. Pinniped Species Summaries and Report on Sirenians, FAO Fisheries Series, Vol. 2, 1979, p 1–4
8. Y. Lee, J. Pan, R. Hathaway, and M. Barkey, Fatigue Testing and Analysis: Theory and Practice, Elsevier, Oxford, 2005
9. A. Kaplan, Effect of Loading Cycle Parameters on Fatigue-Crack Growth (Review), Moscow Aviat. Inst., 1978, 14, p 58–68
10. J. Matthewson and V. Padiyar, Cyclic Fatigue of High Strength Optical Fibers in Bending, Proceedings of the International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 4215, November 2000 (Boston, MA), 2001, p 53–5910.1117/12.424383 ↗
11. Standard Practice for Conducting Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials, e466-07, Book of Standards, Vol. 3.01, ASTM, p 465–469
12. D. Munz and T. Fett, Ceramics: Mechanical Properties, Failure Behaviour, Materials Selection, Springer, Berlin, 199910.1007/978-3-642-58407-7 ↗
13. S. Suresh, Fatigue of Materials, Cambridge University Press, New York, 199810.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
14. J. Wachtman, Mechanical Properties of Ceramics, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1996
15. K. Kohyama, E. Hatakeyama, T. Sasaki, H. Dan, T. Azuma, and K. Karita, Effects of Sample Hardness on Human Chewing Force: A Model Study Using Silicone Rubber, Arch. Oral Biol., 2004, 49, p 805–81610.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.04.006 ↗
16. S. Wroe, C. McHenry, and J. Thomason, Bite Club: Comparative Bite Force in Big Biting Mammals and the Prediction of Predatory Behaviour in Fossil Taxa, Proc. R. Soc. B, 2005, 272, p 619–62510.1098/rspb.2004.2986 ↗
17. C. Homewood, Cracked Tooth Syndrome—Incidence, Clinical Findings and Treatment, Aust. Dent. J., 1998, 43(4), p 217–22210.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00167.x ↗
18. M. Rosentritt, T. Plein, C. Kolbeck, M. Behr, and G. Handel, In Vitro Fracture Force and Marginal Adaptation of Ceramic Crowns Fixed on Natural and Artificial Teeth, Int. J. Prosthodont., 2000, 13, p 387–391
19. M. Collantes, Evaluation of the Importance of Using the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) to Estimate the Likelihood of Head Impact Injury as a Result of a Fall onto Playground Surface Materials, US Consumer Product Safety Commission, 1990
20. M.D. Smith, J.D. Burrington, and A.S. Woolf, Injuries in Children in Free Falls: An Analysis of 66 Cases, J. Trauma, 1975, 15, p 987–99110.1097/00005373-197511000-00008 ↗
21. R.L. Gentry, Development of Social Behavior Through Play in Steller Sea Lion, Am. Zool., 1974, 14(1), p 391–40310.1093/icb/14.1.391 ↗
22. F.E. Sandegren, Courtship Display, Agonistic Behavior and Social Dynamics in Steller Sea Lion (Eumetopias jupatus), Behavior, 1976, 57, p 159–16710.1163/156853976X00154 ↗
23. A.J. Winship, A.W. Trites, and D.G. Calkins, Growth in Body Size of the Steller Sea Lion (Eumetopias jubatus), J. Mammal., 2001, 82(2), p 500–51910.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0500:GIBSOT>2.0.CO;2 ↗
24. E. Ârgen, L. Nordenberg, and T. Mörner, Surgical Implantation of Radiotelemetry Transmitters in European Badgers (Meles meles), J. Zool. Wildlife Med., 2000, 31(1), p 52–5510.1638/1042-7260(2000)031[0052:SIORTI]2.0.CO;2 ↗
25. S.J. Thurlow, Impact Tests on Human Occipital Scalp Material, Br. J. Exp. Pathol., 1963, 5, p 538–545
26. S.N. Robinovitch, T.A. McMahon, and W.C. Hayes, Force Attenuation in Trochanteric Soft Tissues During Impact from a Fall, J. Orthop. Res., 1995, 13, p 956–96210.1002/jor.1100130621 ↗
27. V. Nikolié, J. Hančevié, M. Hudee, and B. Banovié, Absorption of the Impact Energy in the Palmar Soft Tissues, Anat. Embryol., 1999, 148, p 215–22110.1007/BF00315270 ↗
28. “Standard Test Method for Impact Resistance of Flat, Rigid Plastic Specimen by Means of a Striker Impacted by a Falling Weight (Gardner Impact),” D 5420, Book of Standards, Vol. 8:03, ASTM, p 457–463
29. “Standard Test Method for Resistance of Organic Coatings to the Effects of Rapid Deformation (Impact),” D 2794-93(2004), Book of Standards, Vol. 6.01, ASTM, p 378–379
30. E. Dorre and H. Hubner, Alumina, Springer, Berlin, 198410.1007/978-3-642-82304-6 ↗
31. S. Maher, J. Lipman, L. Curley, M. Gilchrist, and T. Wright, Mechanical Performance of Ceramic Acetabular Liners Under Impact Conditions, J. Arthroplasty., 2005, 18, p 936–94110.1016/S0883-5403(03)00335-8 ↗
32. D. Sherman and T. Ben-Shushan, Quasi-stati Impact Damage in Confined Ceramic Tiles, Int. J. Impact Eng., 1998, 21, p 245–26510.1016/S0734-743X(97)00063-8 ↗
33. V. Madhu, K. Ramanjaneyulu, T. Bhat, and N. Gupta, An Experimental Study of Penetration Resistance of Ceramic Armour Subjected to Projectile Impact, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2005, 32, p 337–35010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.03.004 ↗
34. A. Rajendran and D. Dandekar, Inelastic Response of Alumina, Int. J. Impact Eng., 1995, 17, p 649–66010.1016/0734-743X(95)99888-X ↗
35. J. Lopez-Puente, A. Arias, R. Zaera, and C. Navarro, The Effect of the Thickness of the Adhesive Layer on the Ballastic Limit of Ceramic/Metal Armours. An Experimental and Numerical Study, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2005, 32, p 321–33610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.07.014 ↗
36. K. Johnson, T. Fischer, S. Chapman, and B. Wilson, Accidental Head Injuries in Children under 5 Years of Age, Clin. Radiol., 2005, 60, p 464–46810.1016/j.crad.2004.09.013 ↗
37. J. Wood, Dynamic Response of Human Cranial Bone, J. Biomech., 1971, 4, p 1–1210.1016/0021-9290(71)90010-8 ↗
38. C. Farley, J. Glasheen, and T. McMahon, Running Springs: Speed and Animal Size, J. Exp. Biol., 1993, 185, p 71–8610.1242/jeb.185.1.71 ↗
39. M. Ghadiri and Z. Zhang, Impact Attrition of Particulate Solids. Part 1: A Theoretical Model of Chipping, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2002, 57, p 3659–366910.1016/S0009-2509(02)00240-3 ↗
40. J. Healy, A. Bushby, Y. Mai, and A. Mukhopadhyay, Cyclic Fatigue of Long and Short Cracks in Alumina, J. Mater. Sci., 1997, 32, p 741–74710.1023/A:1018556322981 ↗
41. S. Lathabai, Y. Mai, and B. Lawn, Cyclic Fatigue Behavior of an Alumina Ceramic with Crack-Resistance Characteristics, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1989, 72, p 1760–176310.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06323.x ↗
42. Q. Zheng, X. Zheng, and F. Wang, On the Expressions of Fatigue Life of Ceramics with Given Survivability, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1996, 53, p 49–5510.1016/0013-7944(95)00089-E ↗
43. F. Guiberteau, N. Padture, and B. Lawn, Effect of Grain Size on Hertzian Contact Damage in Alumina, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1994, 77, p 1825–183110.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb07057.x ↗
44. X. Huang and M. Tu, Effect of Single Impact Damage on Strength of Alumina and Zirconia-Toughened Alumina, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1996, 15, p 1925–192610.1007/BF00274338 ↗
45. P. Versuchueren, H. Delye, B. Depreitere, C. Van Lierde, B. Haex, D. Berckmans, I. Verpoest, J. Goffin, J. Vander Sloten, and G. Van der Perre, A New Test Set-Up for Skull Fracture Characterization, J. Biomech., 2007, 40(15), p 3389–339610.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.018 ↗
46. E. Gurdjian, J. Webster, and H. Lissner, Studies on Skull Fracture with Particular Reference to Engineering Factors, Am. J. Surg., 1949, 78(5), p 736–74210.1016/0002-9610(49)90315-3 ↗
47. N. Yoganandan, J. Zhang, and F. Pintar, Force and Acceleration Corridors from Lateral Head Impact, Traffic Inj. Prev., 2004, 5(4), p 368–37310.1080/15389580490510336 ↗
48. P. Holck, What Can a Baby’s Skull Withstand? Testing the Skull’s Resistance on an Anatomical Preparation, Forensic Sci. Int., 2005, 151, p 187–19110.1016/j.forsciint.2004.12.038 ↗
49. M. Kleinberger, N. Yoganandan, and S. Kumaresan, Review: Biomechanics of Child Occupant Protection, Traffic In. Prev., 2000, 2(1), p 63–73
50. O. Mohan, B. Bowman, R. Snyder, and D. Foust, A Biomechanical Analysis of Head Impact Injuries to Children, J. Biomech. Eng., 1979, 101, p 250–25910.1115/1.3426254 ↗
51. B. Coats and S. Margulies, Material Properties of Human Infant Skull and Suture at High Rates, J. Neurotrauma, 2006, 23, p 1222–123210.1089/neu.2006.23.1222 ↗
52. T.L. Lyons and R.K. Oates, Falling Out of Bed: A Relatively Benign Occurrence, Pediatrics, 1993, 92, p 125–127
53. S.J. Thurlow, Impact Tests on Human Occipital Scalp Material, Br. J. Exp. Pathol., 1963, 5, p 538–545
54. R.A.H. Jonker and A.W. Trites, Morphometric Measurements and Body Conditions of Healthy and Starving Steller Sea Lion Pups (Eumetopias jubatus), Aquat. Mamm., 2000, 26, p 151–157
55. K.O. Olawale, R.J. Petrell, D.G. Michelson, and A.W. Trites, The Dielectric Properties of the Cranial Skin of Five Young Captive Steller Sea Lions (Eumetropias jubatus), and a Similar Number of Young Domestic Pigs (Sus scrofa) and Sheep (Ovis aries) Between 0.1 and 10 Ghz, Physiol. Meas., 2005, 26, p 627–63710.1088/0967-3334/26/5/005 ↗