journal article·2018-06

Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction Based on Nonlinear Continuum Damage Mechanics and Critical Plane Method

Z. R. Wu, X. Li, L. Fang, Y. D. Song

Publisher page

Abstract

A new multiaxial fatigue life prediction model has been proposed in this paper. The concepts of nonlinear continuum damage mechanics and critical plane criteria were incorporated in the proposed model. The shear strain-based damage control parameter was chosen to account for multiaxial fatigue damage under constant amplitude loading. Fatigue tests were conducted on nickel-based superalloy GH4169 tubular specimens at the temperature of 400 °C under proportional and nonproportional loading. The proposed method was checked against the multiaxial fatigue test data of GH4169. Most of prediction results are within a factor of two scatter band of the test results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. K. Kanazawa, J.K. Miller, and M. Brown, Low Cycle Fatigue Under Out-of-Phase Loading Conditions, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1977, 99, p 222–22810.1115/1.3443523 ↗
2. D.F. Socie, Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Models, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1987, 109, p 293–29810.1115/1.3225980 ↗
3. Y. Xiong, Y. Qin, and Y. Jiang, Multiaxial Fatigue of Extruded AZ31B Magnesium Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 546, p 119–12810.1016/j.msea.2012.03.039 ↗
4. B.R. You and S.B. Lee, A Critical Review on Multiaxial Fatigue Assessments of Metals, Int. J. Fatigue, 1996, 18, p 235–24410.1016/0142-1123(96)00002-3 ↗
5. L.V. Papadopoulos, P. Davoli, C. Gorla, M. Filippini, and A. Bernasconi, A Comparative Study of Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria for Metals, Int. J. Fatigue, 1997, 19, p 219–23510.1016/S0142-1123(96)00064-3 ↗
6. A. Fatemi and N. Shamsaei, An Overview and Some Approximation Models for Life Estimation, Int. J. Fatigue, 2011, 33, p 948–95810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.003 ↗
7. M.W. Brown and J.K. Miller, A Theory for Fatigue Failure Under Multiaxial Stress–Strain Conditions, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 1973, 187, p 745–75510.1243/PIME_PROC_1973_187_161_02 ↗
8. A. Fatemi and D.F. Socie, A Critical Plane Approach to Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Including Out-of-phase Loading, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1988, 11, p 149–16610.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
9. D.G. Shang, Q. Sun, and J. Deng, Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Parameter and Life Prediction for Medium-Carbon Steel Based on the Critical Plane Approach, Int. J. Fatigue, 2007, 29, p 2200–220710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.12.005 ↗
10. Z.R. Wu, X.T. Hu, and Y.D. Song, Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction for Titanimum Alloy TC4 Under Proportional and Nonproportional Loading, Int. J. Fatigue, 2014, 59, p 170–17510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.028 ↗
11. Y.Y. Wang and W.X. Yao, A Multiaxial Fatigue Criterion for Various Metallic Materials Under Proportional and Nonproportional Loading, Int. J. Fatigue, 2006, 28, p 401–40810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.007 ↗
12. A. Fatemi and L. Yang, Cumulative Fatigue Damage and Life Prediction Theories: A Survey of the State of the Art for Homogeneous Materials, Int. J. Fatigue, 1998, 20, p 9–3410.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9 ↗
13. L.M. Kachanov, Introduction to continuum damage mechanics, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 198610.1007/978-94-017-1957-5 ↗
14. Y.N. Rabotnov, Creep problems under in structural members, Noth Holland, Amsterdam, 1969
15. J.L. Chaboche, Continuum Damage Mechanics—A Tool to Describe Phenomena Before Crack Initiation, Nucl. Eng. Des., 1981, 64, p 233–24710.1016/0029-5493(81)90007-8 ↗
16. J. Lamaitre and J.L. Chaboche, Mechanics of solid materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 199010.1017/CBO9781139167970 ↗
17. M. Chaudonneret, A Simple and Efficient Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Model for Engineering Applications of Macro-Crack Initiation, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1993, 115, p 373–37910.1115/1.2904232 ↗
18. G. Sines, Behavior of Metals Under Complex Static and Alternating Stresses, Metal. Fatigue., ed. by Sines and Waisman, McGraw-Hill, 1959
19. J.L. Chaboche and P.M. Lesne, A Non-linear Continuous Fatigue Damage Model, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1988, 11, p 1–1710.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01216.x ↗
20. K.J. Pascoe and J.W. Devilliers, Low Cycle Fatigue of Steel Under Biaxial Straining, J. Strain. Anal., 1967, 2, p 117–12610.1243/03093247V022117 ↗
21. F. Alexander, S. Deyber, and A. Pineau, Modeling the Optimum Grain Size on the Low Cycle Fatigue Life of a Ni Based Superalloy in the Presence of Two Possible Crack Initiation Sites, Scr. Mater., 2004, 20, p 25–3010.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.043 ↗
22. P. Gao, K. Zhang, B. Zhang, and S. Jiang, Microstructures and High Temperature Mechanical Properties of Electron Beam Weld Inconel 718 Superalloy Thick Plate, Trans. Nonferrous. Metal. Soc., 2011, 21, p s315–s32210.1016/S1003-6326(11)61598-7 ↗
23. F.C. Campbell, Elements of Metallurgy and Engineering Alloys, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 2008, p 265–26610.31399/asm.tb.emea.t52240265 ↗
24. S. Nima, M. Gladskyi, K. Panasovski, S. Shukaev, and A. Fatemi, Multiaxial Fatigue of Titanium Including Step Loading and Load Path Alteration and Sequence Effects, Int. J. Fatigue., 2010, 32, p 1862–187410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.05.006 ↗
25. M.W. Brown and K.J. Miller, High Temperature Low Cycle Biaxial Fatigue of Two Steels, Fatigue. Engng. Mater. Struct., 1979, 1, p 217–22910.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb00379.x ↗
26. D.F. Socie, L.A. Waill and D.F. Dittmer, Biaxial fatigue if Inconel 718 including mean stress effects, ASTM STP 853, Multiaxial Fatigue, 1985, p 463–48110.1520/STP36238S ↗
27. S. Kalnaus, Y. Jiang, Fatigue of AL6XN Stainless Steel, J. Eng. Mater. Techol. Trans. ASME, 2008, 13010.1115/1.2931154 ↗
28. A. Fatemi and P. Kurath, Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction Under the Influence of Mean Stress, J. Eng. Mater. Techol. Trans. ASME, 1988, 110, p 380–38810.1115/1.3226066 ↗