journal article·2017-07Open access

Effect of Cooling Rate on the Mechanical Strength of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Sheets in Press Forming

D. Tatsuno, T. Yoneyama, K. Kawamoto, M. Okamoto

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to elucidate the effect of the cooling rate of the carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic (CFRTP) sheets on the mechanical property in the press forming within 1 min cycle time. In order to pay attention only to the compression stage after the deformation stage in press forming, a flat sheet of dimensions 200 mm × 100 mm × 3 mm was produced. It was fabricated by stacking 15 CFRTP sheets of 0.2-mm-thick plain woven fabric impregnated with PA6, preheating them to 280 °C and pressing them at 5 MPa using a die cooled from near the melting temperature of PA6 with various cooling rates. Cooling rate of −26 °C/s with pressure holding time (defined in this study as the period that the pressure sensor detects high pressure) of 7 s and that of −4.4 °C/s with pressure holding time of 18 s gave a flexural strength of 536 and 733 MPa, respectively. It was found that the cooling rate during pressure holding is related to the mechanical property of press-formed CFRTP part. © 2017 ASM International Embargo Period 12 months
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. K. Friedrich and A.A. Almajid, Manufacturing Aspects of Advanced Polymer Composites for Automotive Applications, Appl. Compos. Mater., 2013, 20, p 107–12810.1007/s10443-012-9258-7 ↗
2. A.G. Gibson and J.-A. Månson, Impregnation Technology for Thermoplastic Matrix Composites, Compos. Manuf., 1992, 3, p 223–23310.1016/0956-7143(92)90110-G ↗
3. N. Bernet, V. Michaud, P.E. Bourban, and J.-A.E. Månson, Commingled Yarn Composites for Rapid Processing of Complex Shapes, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2001, 32, p 1613–162610.1016/S1359-835X(00)00180-9 ↗
4. K. van Rijswijk and H.E.N. Bersee, Reactive Processing of Textile Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites—An Overview, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2007, 38, p 666–68110.1016/j.compositesa.2006.05.007 ↗
5. C. Hopmann, M. Hildebrandt, R. Bouffier, K. Fischer, Inline-impregnation—individualized production of thermoplastic continuous fiber reinforced composite parts, in Proceedings of SAMPE Baltimore 2015, Baltimore, 2015.
6. W.J.B. Grouve and R. Akkerman, Multi-scale Effects in the Consolidation of Thermoplastic Laminates, Int. J. Mater. Form., 2009, 2, p 157–16010.1007/s12289-009-0611-9 ↗
7. S.T. Jespersen, M.D. Wakeman, V. Michaud, D. Cramer, and J.-A.E. Månson, Film Stacking Impregnation Model for a Novel Net Shape Thermoplastic Composite Preforming Process, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2008, 68, p 1822–183010.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.019 ↗
8. D. Liu, Y. Zhu, J. Ding, X. Lin, and X. Fan, Experimental Investigation of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Poly(Phenylene Sulfide) Composites Prepared Using a Double-Belt Press, Compos. Part B Eng., 2015, 77, p 363–37010.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.062 ↗
9. M. Lu, L. Ye, and Y.W. Mai, Thermal De-consolidation of Thermoplastic Matrix Composites-II. “Migration” of Voids and “Re-consolidation”, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2004, 64, p 191–20210.1016/S0266-3538(03)00233-1 ↗
10. M.D. Wakeman, P. Blanchard, J.-A.E. Månson, Void Evolution During Stamp-Forming of Thermoplastic Composites, in Proceedings of 15th International Congress Composite Materials, Durban, 2005
11. M. Hou, L. Ye, H.J. Lee, and Y.W. Mai, Manufacture of a Carbon-Fabric-Reinforced Polyetherimide (CF/PEI) Composite Material, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1998, 58, p 181–19010.1016/S0266-3538(97)00117-6 ↗
12. H. Lessard, G. Lebrun, A. Benkaddour, and X.T. Pham, Influence of Process Parameters on the Thermostamping of a [0/90]12 Carbon/Polyether Ether Ketone Laminate, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2015, 70, p 59–6810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.009 ↗
13. C.M. O’Bradaigh and P.J. Mallon, Effect of Forming Temperature on the Properties of Polymeric Diaphragm Formed Thermoplastic Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1989, 35, p 235–25510.1016/0266-3538(89)90037-7 ↗
14. K. Fujihara, Z.M. Huang, S. Ramakrishna, and H. Hamada, Influence of Processing Conditions on Bending Property of Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2004, 64, p 2525–253410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.05.014 ↗
15. M. Hou, L. Ye, and Y.W. Mai, Manufacturing Process and Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Composite Components, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1997, 63, p 334–33810.1016/S0924-0136(96)02644-1 ↗
16. J. Nowacki and M. Neitzel, Thermoforming of Reinforced Thermoplastic Stiffened Structure, Polym. Compos., 2000, 21, p 531–53810.1002/pc.10208 ↗
17. A. Beehag and L. Ye, Role of Cooling Pressure on Interlaminar Fracture Properties of Commingled CF/PEEK Composites, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 1996, 27, p 175–18210.1016/1359-835X(95)00027-Y ↗
18. L. Ye, K. Friedrich, J. Kästel, and Y.W. Mai, Consolidation of Unidirectional CF/PEEK Composites from Commingled Yarn Prepreg, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1995, 54, p 349–35810.1016/0266-3538(95)00061-5 ↗
19. S.S. Pesetskii, B. Jurkowski, Y.A. Olkhov, S.P. Bogdanovich, and V.N. Koval, Influence of a Cooling Rate on a Structure of PA6, Eur. Polym. J., 2005, 41, p 1380–139010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.12.009 ↗
20. C. Mayer, X. Wang, and M. Neitzel, Macro- and Micro-impregnation Phenomena in Continuous Manufacturing of Fabric Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 1998, 29, p 783–79310.1016/S1359-835X(98)00056-6 ↗
21. T. Guglhoer, M. Korkisch, G.R.M. Sause, Influence of Carbon Fibers on the Crystallinity of Polyamide 6, in 20th International Congress on Composite Materials, Copenhagen, 2015