Densification Behavior and Performances of C/C Composites Derived from Various Carbon Matrix Precursors
Source abstract
Abstract
Three types of carbon/carbon (C/C) composites were manufactured by densifying the needled carbon fiber preform through resin and pitch impregnation/carbonization repeatedly, as well as propylene pyrolysis by chemical vapor infiltration plus carbonization after the resin impregnation/carbonization. The densification behavior and performances (involving electric, thermal, and mechanical properties, as well as impurity) of the C/C composites were investigated systematically. The results show that besides the processing and testing conditions, the electric resistivity, thermal conductivity (TC), coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), strength, and fracture, as well as impurity content and composition of the C/C composites were closely related to the fiber orientation, interfacial bonding between carbon fiber and carbon matrix, material characteristics of the three precursors and the resulting matrix carbons. In particular, the resin-carbon matrix C/C (RC/C) composites had the highest electric resistivity, tensile, and flexural strength, as well as impurity content. Meanwhile, the pitch-carbon matrix C/C (PC/C) composites possessed the highest TC and CTE in the parallel and vertical direction. And most of the performances of pyro-carbon/resin carbon matrix C/C composites were between those of the RC/C and PC/C composites except the impurity content.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. R.Y. Luo, Friction Performance of C/C Composites Prepared Using Rapid Directional Diffused Chemical Vapor Infiltration Processes, Carbon, 2002, 40(8), p 1279–128510.1016/S0008-6223(01)00283-4 ↗
2. O. Siron, G. Chollon, H. Tsuda, H. Yamauchi, K. Maeda, and K. Kosaka, Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Filler-Added Coal-Tar Pitch-Based C/C Composites: The Damage and Fraction Process in Correction with AE Waveform Parameters, Carbon, 2000, 38(9), p 1369–138910.1016/S0008-6223(99)00270-5 ↗
3. J. Chen, X. Xiong, and P. Xiao, Thermal Conductivity of Unidirectional Carbon/Carbon Composites with Different Carbon Matrixes, Mater. Des., 2009, 30(4), p 1413–141610.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.047 ↗
4. E. Fitzer, Carbon Fibres and Their Composites, Springer, Berlin, 198510.1007/978-3-642-70725-4 ↗
5. Y.Z. Song, G.T. Zhai, J.R. Song, G.S. Liu, J.L. Shi, Q.G. Guo et al., Seal and Wear Properties of Graphite from MCMBs/Pitch-Based Carbon/Phenolic-Based Carbon Composites, Carbon, 2006, 44(13), p 2793–279610.1016/j.carbon.2006.03.028 ↗
6. V.E. Yudin, M.Y. Goykhman, K. Balik, P. Glogar, P. Polivka, G.N. Gubanova et al., Carbon/Carbon Composites Based on a Polyimide Matrix with Coal Tar Pitch, Carbon, 2002, 40(9), p 1427–143310.1016/S0008-6223(01)00313-X ↗
7. C. Blanco, R. Santamaria, J. Bermejo, and R. Menendez, Pitch-Based Carbon Composites with Granular Reinforcements for Frictional Applications, Carbon, 2000, 38(7), p 1043–105110.1016/S0008-6223(99)00212-2 ↗
8. S.S. Tzeng and Y.G. Chr, Evolution of Microstructure and Properties of Phenolic Resin-Based Carbon/Carbon Composites During Pyrolysis, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2002, 73(2–3), p 162–16910.1016/S0254-0584(01)00358-3 ↗
9. H.W. He, J.L. Wang, K.X. Li, J. Wang, and J.Y. Gu, Mixed Resin and Carbon Fibres Surface Treatment for Preparation of Carbon Fibres Composites with Good Interfacial Bonding Strength, Mater. Des., 2010, 31(10), p 4631–463710.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.031 ↗
10. M.H. Choi, B.H. Jeon, and I.J. Chung, The Effect of Coupling Agent on Electrical and Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber/Phenolic Resin Composites, Polymer, 2000, 41(9), p 3243–325210.1016/S0032-3861(99)00532-7 ↗
11. K. Norinaga, O. Deutschmann, and K.J. Huttinger, Analysis of Gas Phase Compounds in Chemical Vapor Deposition of Carbon from Light Hydrocarbons, Carbon, 2006, 44(9), p 1790–180010.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.050 ↗
12. V. De Pauw, J. Hawecker, R. Schneider, W. Send, X.L. Wang, and D. Gerthsen, Dependence of Pyrocarbon Microstructure on the Substrate and Annealing During the Initial Stage of Chemical Vapor Deposition, Carbon, 2008, 46(2), p 236–24410.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.009 ↗
13. X.W. Wu, R.Y. Luo, J.C. Zhang, Q. Xiang, and Y.F. Ni, Deposition Mechanism and Microstructure of Pyrocarbon Prepared by Chemical Vapor Infiltration with Kerosene as Precursor, Carbon, 2009, 47(6), p 1429–143510.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.035 ↗
14. K.J. Lee, J.H.C. Lin, and C.P. Ju, Simulated-Stop Tribological Behavior of Pitch-Resin-CVI, Carbon-Carbon Composite, Mater. Chem. Phys., 1997, 49(3), p 217–22410.1016/S0254-0584(97)80167-8 ↗
15. B.L. Lei, M.Z. Yi, H.J. Xu, L.P. Ran, Y.C. Ge, and K. Peng, Effect of Resin-Derived Carbon on the Friction Behavior of Carbon/Carbon Composites, Tribol. Lett., 2011, 41, p 371–37810.1007/s11249-010-9723-0 ↗
16. C.P. Ju, J.H.C. Lin, K.J. Lee, and H.H. Kuo, Multi-Braking Tribological Behavior of PAN-Pitch, PAN-CVI, and Pitch-Resin-CVI, Carbon-Carbon Composites, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2000, 64, p 196–21410.1016/S0254-0584(99)00260-6 ↗
17. H.L. Li, H.J. Li, J.H. Lu, C. Sun, Y.J. Wang et al., Improvement in Toughness of Carbon/Carbon Composites Using Multiple Matrixes, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 530, p 57–6210.1016/j.msea.2011.09.038 ↗
18. J.C. Zhang, R.Y. Luo, Q. Xiang, and C.L. Yang, Compressive Fracture Behavior of 3D Needle-Punched Carbon/Carbon Composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528, p 5002–500610.1016/j.msea.2011.03.055 ↗
19. G. Savage, Carbon-Carbon Composites, Hapman & Hall, London, 1993, p 309–31710.1007/978-94-011-1586-5 ↗