Modeling Blanking Process Using Multiple Regression Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
The design of blanking processes requires the availability of a procedure able to deal with both tooling and mechanical properties of the workpiece material (blank thickness, hardness, ductility, etc.). This research presents the development and comparison of two models to predict the quality of the blanked edge represented by burrs height, the first model is an artificial neural network (ANN) based, while the second model is a multiple regression analysis (MRA) based. Finite Element modeling of the blanking process was used to generate the data for both models. Both ANN and MRA are able to give good prediction results, however, ANN still more accurate because it deals efficiently with hidden nonlinear relations when compared to MRA. The comparison between experimental and model results shows that average absolute relative error in the case of ANN was <2.20% for carbon steel and 4.85% for corrosion-resistant steel (CRES) compared to 15.18% for carbon steel and 14.22% for CRES obtained from the second order MRA. Therefore, by using ANN outputs, satisfactory results can be estimated rather than measured and hence reduce testing time and cost.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. I. Wadi and R. Balendra, Using Neural Networks to Model the Blanking Process, J. Mater. Process. T., 1999, 91, p 52–6510.1016/S0924-0136(98)00426-9 ↗
2. I. Wadi and R. Balendra, An Intelligent Approach to Monitor and Control the Blanking Process, Adv. Eng. Softw., 1999, 30, p 85–9210.1016/S0965-9978(98)00067-2 ↗
3. R. Hambli, Prediction of Burr Height Formation in Blanking Processes Using Neural Network, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2002, 44, p 2089–210210.1016/S0020-7403(02)00168-6 ↗
4. R. Hambli and F. Guerin, Application of a Neural Network for Optimum Clearance Prediction in Sheet Metal Blanking Processes, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 2003, 39, p 1039–105210.1016/S0168-874X(02)00155-5 ↗
5. C. Husson, J. Correia, L. Daridon, and S. Ahzi, Finite Elements Simulations of Thin Copper Sheets Blanking: Study of Blanking Parameters on Sheared Edge Quality, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, 199, p 74–8310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.034 ↗
6. E. Al-Momani and I. Rawabdeh, An Application of Finite Element Method and Design of Experiments in the Optimization of Sheet Metal Blanking Process, Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng., 2008, 2(1), p 53–63
7. E. Al-Momani, S. Lu, I. Rawabdeh, and R. Alqudah, A Hybrid Approach for Optimizing Sheet Metal Blanking Process, IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2010, June 5–9, Cancun, Mexico.
8. C. Garcıa, Artificial Intelligence Applied to Automatic Supervision, Diagnosis and Control in Sheet Metal Stamping Processes, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, 164–165, p 1351–135710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.031 ↗
9. W. Klingenberga and T.W. de Boer, Condition-Based Maintenance in Punching/Blanking of Sheet Metal, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2008, 48, p 589–59810.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.08.013 ↗
10. S.K. Choudhury and K.K. Kishore, Tool Wear Measurement in Turning Using Force Ratio, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2000, 40, p 899–90910.1016/S0890-6955(99)00088-7 ↗
11. T. Yandayan and M. Burdekin, In-Process Dimensional Measurements and Control of Workpiece Accuracy, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 1997, 37(10), p 1423–143910.1016/S0890-6955(97)00019-9 ↗
12. S.A. Coker and Y.C. Shin, In-Process Control of Surface Roughness Due to Tool Wear Using a New Ultrasonic System, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 1996, 36(3), p 411–42210.1016/0890-6955(95)00057-7 ↗
13. W. Klingenberg and U.P. Singh, Design and Optimization of Punching/ Blanking Systems, Aided by Experimental Modeling, Int. J. Vehicle Des., 2005, 39(1/2), p 125–13910.1504/IJVD.2005.007224 ↗
14. W. Klingenberg and U.P. Singh, Comparison of Two Analytical Models of Blanking and Proposal of a New Model, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2005, 45(4–5), p 519–52710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.002 ↗
15. M. Ge, R. Du, and Y. Xu, Hidden Markov Model Based Fault Diagnosis for Stamping Processes, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2004, 18, p 391–40810.1016/S0888-3270(03)00076-1 ↗
16. S. Zhang and F. Wang, Comparison of Friction and Wear Performances of Brake Material Dry Sliding Against Two Aluminum Matrix Composites Reinforced with Different SiC Particles, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2007, 182, p 122–12710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.07.018 ↗
17. J.R. Rogier and M.W. Geatz, Data Mining: A Tutorial-Based Primer, Addison–Wesely, Boston, 2003
18. M. Negnevitsky, Artificial Intelligence, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Harlow, 2005
19. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_determination , last accessed October 2010.