Influence of Sulfur Content on the Corrosion Resistance of 17-4PH Stainless Steel
Source abstract
Abstract
According to specification standards, the basic chemical composition of steel 17-4PH for special and critical applications is 15-17% Cr, 3.0-5.0% Ni, 3.0-5.0% Cu, 0.07% C (max) and 0.15-0.45% (Nb + Ta) (wt.%). The maximum sulfur content is 0.030%. However, as it will be shown in this work, this maximum limit for sulfur is too high for services where high corrosion resistance is necessary. Two samples of 17-4PH steel with similar base compositions, but quite different sulfur contents (0.027% and 0.001%S), were compared with respect to pitting corrosion and sensitization. Both materials were heat treated according to commercial treatments A, H900, H1100, H1150 and H1150D (ASTM A-1082). Two corrosion tests were applied to compare the steels. The first one was the double-loop electrochemical potentiodynamic reactivation (DL-EPR) test in 0.25 M H2SO4 + 0.01 KSCN solution, which is used to measure the degree of sensitization. The second test was the anodic polarization in 3.5%NaCl solution, commonly used to evaluate the pitting corrosion resistance. Detailed microstructural characterization by magnetic measurements, light optical and scanning electron microscopy was performed. As main conclusion, despite that both steels have chemical compositions in accordance with the standards, the steel with higher sulfur was much more susceptible to pitting and sensitization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM A-747ASTM A747/A747M-12, Standard Specification for Steel Castings, Stainless, Precipitation Hardening, ASTM, West Conshohocken, 2012
2. V.H. Lara, L.G. Fuentes, O.C. Alvarado et al., Hot Ductility of the 17-4PH Stainless Steels, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25, p 1041. doi: 10.1007/s11665-016-1895-910.1007/s11665-016-1895-9 ↗
3. J. Wang, Y. Lin, H. Fan et al., Effects of Temperature on Microstructure and Wear of Salt Bath Nitrided 17-4PH Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2012, 21, p 1708. doi: 10.1007/s11665-011-0077-z10.1007/s11665-011-0077-z ↗
4. H.K. Rafi, D. Pal, N. Patil et al., Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of 17-4 Precipitation Hardenable Steel Processed by Selective Laser Melting, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23, p 4421. doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-1226-y10.1007/s11665-014-1226-y ↗
5. ASTM A-1082/1082M, Standard Specification for High Strength Precipitation Hardening and Duplex Stainless Steel Bolting for Special Purpose Applications, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2013
6. AMS 5604-H. Steel, Corrosion Resistant, Sheet, Strip, and Plate, 16.5Cr-4.0Ni-4.0Cu-0.30Cb, Solution Heat Treated, Precipitation Hardenable, SAE International, 2016
7. G. Yeli, M.A. Auger, K. Wilford, G.D.W. Smith, P.A.J. Bagot, and M.P. Moody, Sequential Nucleation of Phases in a 17-4PH Steel: Microstructural Characterization and Mechanical Properties, Acta Mater., 2017, 125, p 3810.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.052 ↗
8. C.N. Hsiao, C.S. Chiou, and J.R. Yang, Aging Reactions in a 17-4PH Stainless Steel, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2002, 74, p 13210.1016/S0254-0584(01)00460-6 ↗
9. F. Christien, R. Le Gall, and G. Saindrenan, Phosphorus Grain Boundary Segregation in Steel 17-4PH, Scr. Mater., 2003, 48, p 1110.1016/S1359-6462(02)00309-3 ↗
10. H. Mirzadeh and A. Najafizadeh, Aging Kinetics of 17-4PH Stainless Steel, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2009, 116, p 11910.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.02.049 ↗
11. T.V. Shibaeva, V.K. Laurinavichyute, G.A. Tsirlina, A.M. Arsenkin, and K.V. Grigorovich, The Effect of Microstructure and Non-metallic Inclusions on Corrosion Behavior of Low Carbon Steel in Chloride Containing Solutions, Corros. Sci., 2014, 80, p 29910.1016/j.corsci.2013.11.038 ↗
12. I.-J. Park, S.-M. Lee, M. Kang, S. Lee, and Y.-K. Lee, Pitting Corrosion Resistance in Advanced High Strength Steel, J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 619, p 20510.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.243 ↗
13. C. Azevedo, Failure Analysis of a Crude Oil Pipeline, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2007, 14, p 97810.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.12.001 ↗
14. C.F. Arisoy, G. Başman, and M.K. Şeşen, Failure of a 17-4PH Stainless Steel Sailboat Propeller Shaft, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2003, 10, p 71110.1016/S1350-6307(03)00041-4 ↗
15. V. Čihal and R. Štefec, On the Development of the Electrochemical Potentiokinetic Method, Electrochim. Acta, 2001, 46, p 386710.1016/S0013-4686(01)00674-0 ↗
16. B.D. Cullity and C.D. Graham, Introduction to Magnetic Materials, IEEE Press and Willey, Piscataway, 2009
17. S. Strobl, R. Haubner, and P. Linhardt, Microstructure and EPR Studies of 13% Chromium Steels After Various Heat Treatments and the Influence of MnS on the EPR Test, Pract. Metallogr., 2012, 49(3), p 15510.3139/147.110146 ↗
18. J. Wang, H. Zou, C. Li, R. Zao, S. Qiu, and B. Shen, Relationship of Microstructure Transformation and Hardening Behavior of Type 17-4PH Stainless Steel, J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing, 2006, 13(3), p 23510.1016/S1005-8850(06)60050-9 ↗
19. M.P. Ryan, D.E. Willians, R.J. Chater, and B.M. Hutton, Why Stainless Steels Corrodes?, Nature, 2002, 415, p 77010.1038/415770a ↗