Experimental Analysis of 3D-Printed Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Nylon Composites Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling Using a Statistical Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. K. Kanishka and B. Acherjee, Revolutionizing Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Overview of Additive Manufacturing Processes, Materials, Developments, and Challenges, J. Manuf. Process., 2023, 107, p 574–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.10.02410.1016/j.jmapro.2023.10.024 ↗
2. D. Rahmatabadi et al., 4D Printing and Annealing of PETG Composites Reinforced with Short Carbon Fibers, Phys. Scr., 2024, 99(5), p 055957. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad3b4010.1088/1402-4896/ad3b40 ↗
3. A. Bayati et al., 3D printed elastomers with superior stretchability and mechanical integrity by parametric optimization of extrusion process using Taguchi Method, Mater. Res. Express, 2025, 12(1), p 015301. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ada1a610.1088/2053-1591/ada1a6 ↗
4. K. Mirasadi, D. Rahmatabadi, I. Ghasemi, M. Khodaei, M. Baniassadi, and M. Baghani, Investigating the effect of ABS on the Mechanical Properties, Morphology, Printability, and 4d Printing of PETG-ABS Blends, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2024, 309(6), p 2400038. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20240003810.1002/mame.202400038 ↗
5. M. Moradi, O. Mehrabi, F. A. Rasoul, A. A. Mattie, F. Schaber, and R. Khandan, "Enhancing 3D Printing Copper-PLA Composite Fabrication via Fused Deposition Modeling through Statistical Process Parameter Study," Micromachines, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 1082, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/15/9/1082.10.3390/mi15091082 ↗
6. V. Kumar, N. Bharat, D. Veeman, M. Vellaisamy, V. Singh, and A. Bansal, Influence of Printing-Based Factors on the Mechanical Performance of PLA/PLA with Ceramic Reinforcement 3d-Printed Specimens, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-025-10887-210.1007/s11665-025-10887-2 ↗
7. N. Bharat, V. Dhinakaran, V. Mishra, and V. Kumar, Development and Characterization of Novel PLA/Henna Biocomposites for Sustainable Additive Manufacturing, J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater., 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-025-03733-410.1007/s10904-025-03733-4 ↗
8. V. Mishra, S. Negi, N. Bharat, D. Veeman, and V. Kumar, "Effect of FFF parameters on PLA/WD composite properties: Comparative analysis using Taguchi and GRA approach," Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 0, no. 0, p. 07316844251314979, https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844251314979.10.1177/07316844251314979 ↗
9. N. Bharat, V. Kumar, D. Veeman, and M. Vellaisamy, Enhancing Mechanical Properties of 3D-printed PLA/Wood Composites: A Metaheuristic and Statistical Perspective, Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., 2025, 83(3), 99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-025-02253-910.1007/s00107-025-02253-9 ↗
10. H. Sun et al., Near-Perfect Turning of Robot-Based 3d Printing Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced Nylon Composites Based on Fiber-Scale Internal Stress Characterization, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2023, 175, 107805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10780510.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107805 ↗
11. H.L. Tekinalp et al., Highly Oriented Carbon Fiber–Polymer Composites Via Additive Manufacturing, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2014, 105, p 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
12. A. Pandzic and D. Hodzic, "Mechanical properties comparison of PLA, tough PLA and PC 3D printed materials with infill structure – Influence of infill pattern on tensile mechanical properties," IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1208, no. 1, p. 012019, 2021/11/01 2021, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1208/1/012019.10.1088/1757-899X/1208/1/012019 ↗
13. M. Galetto, E. Verna, and G. Genta, Effect of Process Parameters on Parts Quality and Process Efficiency of Fused Deposition Modeling, Comput. Ind. Eng., 2021, 156, 107238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.10723810.1016/j.cie.2021.107238 ↗
14. D.T. Pham and R.S. Gault, A Comparison of Rapid Prototyping Technologies, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 1998, 38(10), p 1257–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00137-510.1016/S0890-6955(97)00137-5 ↗
15. Y. Wang, Z. Niu, H. Han, J. Wang, and D. Lan, Observation of Structural, Mechanical, Thermal and Microwave Dielectric Properties of Carbon Black Reinforced PA6/HDPE Nanocomposites, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., 2023, 34(28), 1948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-11360-310.1007/s10854-023-11360-3 ↗
16. J. Zhang, Y. Hu, Q. Li, and C. Yin, Mechanical Performance Simulation and Optimal Design of Carbon Fiber Composite B-Pillar, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2024, 32(6), 065022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ad620210.1088/1361-651X/ad6202 ↗
17. X. Zuo et al., 3D Printed All-Natural Hydrogels: Flame-Retardant Materials Toward Attaining Green Sustainability, Adv. Sci., 2024, 11(3), p 2306360. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20230636010.1002/advs.202306360 ↗
18. S. Chen, S.B. Khan, N. Li, and C. Xiao, In-depth Analysis of Sintering, Exposure Time, and Layer Height (um) in LRS 3D Printed Devices with DLP, J. Manuf. Process., 2025, 133, p 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.11.06010.1016/j.jmapro.2024.11.060 ↗
19. A. Hassan, T. Alomayri, M.F. Noaman, and C. Zhang, 3D Printed Concrete for Sustainable Construction: A Review of Mechanical Properties and Environmental Impact, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 2025, 32(5), p 2713–2743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10220-510.1007/s11831-024-10220-5 ↗
20. M. Sun et al., Mechanical Properties of a Novel Mechanical Metamaterial With Multi-Stable and Mono-Stable Characteristics, Thin-Walled Struct., 2025, 212, 113230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2025.11323010.1016/j.tws.2025.113230 ↗
21. Y. Qiao et al., Phenolic-Based Porous Composite with Embedded Short Carbon Fiber/Hollow Spheres for Mechanical Properties and Thermostability, Compos. Commun., 2025, 55, 102305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2025.10230510.1016/j.coco.2025.102305 ↗
22. R.T.L. Ferreira, I.C. Amatte, T.A. Dutra, and D. Bürger, Experimental Characterization and Micrography of 3D Printed PLA and PLA Reinforced with Short Carbon Fibers, Compos. Part B Eng., 2017, 124, p 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.013 ↗
23. K. Wang, S. Li, Y. Rao, Y. Wu, Y.Peng, S.Yao, H. Zhang, and S. Ahzi, "Flexure Behaviors of ABS-Based Composites Containing Carbon and Kevlar Fibers by Material Extrusion 3D Printing," Polymers, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 1878, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/11/11/1878.10.3390/polym11111878 ↗
24. M. Moradi, A. Aminzadeh, D. Rahmatabadi, and S.A. Rasouli, Statistical and Experimental Analysis of Process Parameters of 3D Nylon Printed Parts by Fused Deposition Modeling: Response Surface Modeling and Optimization, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(7), p 5441–5454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05848-410.1007/s11665-021-05848-4 ↗
25. F. Lupone, E. Padovano, C. Venezia, and C. Badini, "Experimental Characterization and Modeling of 3D Printed Continuous Carbon Fibers Composites with Different Fiber Orientation Produced by FFF Process," Polymers, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 426, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/3/426.10.3390/polym14030426 ↗
26. W. Chen and Q. Zhang, "Tensile Performances of Continuous Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites with holes processed by 3D Printing, Laser and Drilling," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2383, no. 1, p. 012134, 2022/12/01 2022, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2383/1/012134.10.1088/1742-6596/2383/1/012134 ↗
27. H. Tang, Q. Sun, Z. Li, X. Su, and W. Yan, Longitudinal Compression Failure of 3D Printed Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites: An Experimental and Computational Study, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2021, 146, 106416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10641610.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106416 ↗
28. X. Tian, T. Liu, C. Yang, Q. Wang, and D. Li, Interface and Performance of 3D Printed Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced PLA Composites, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2016, 88, p 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 ↗
29. A. Todoroki et al., Tensile Property Evaluations of 3D Printed Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites, Adv. Compos. Mater., 2020, 29(2), p 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2019.165032310.1080/09243046.2019.1650323 ↗
30. S. Singh, S. Ramakrishna, and R. Singh, Material Issues in Additive Manufacturing: A Review, J. Manuf. Process., 2017, 25, p 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.00610.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.006 ↗
31. Y. Peng et al., Tailorable Rigidity and Energy-Absorption Capability of 3D Printed Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyamide Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2020, 199, 108337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10833710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108337 ↗
32. N. Bharat, V. Kumar, V. Mishra, D. Veeman, and M. Vellaisamy, Influence of 3D Printing FDM Process Parameters on Compressive Strength of PLA/Carbon Fiber Composites: ANOVA and Backpropagation Neural Network Approach, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-025-10783-910.1007/s11665-025-10783-9 ↗
33. M. Moradi, Z. Malekshahi Beiranvand, N. Salimi, S. Meiabadi, and J. Lawrence, Experimental Investigation on the 3d Printing of Nylon Reinforced by Carbon Fiber Through Fused Filament Fabrication Process, Effects of Extruder Temperature, and Printing Speed, Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2024, 2024(1), 1234797. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/123479710.1155/2024/1234797 ↗
34. O. Mehrabi, H. Sabri, M. Karamimoghadam, M. Khoran, G. Casalino, and M. Moradi, Statistical and Experimental Study on Additive Manufacturing of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol Using Fused Deposition Modeling, Smart Materials & Methods, 2024, 1(2), p 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/29963176.2024.239684710.1080/29963176.2024.2396847 ↗
35. M.A. Bezerra, R.E. Santelli, E.P. Oliveira, L.S. Villar, and L.A. Escaleira, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) as a Tool For Optimization in Analytical Chemistry, Talanta, 2008, 76(5), p 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.01910.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019 ↗
36. V. Panwar, D. Kumar Sharma, K.V. Pradeep Kumar, A. Jain, and C. Thakar, Experimental Investigations and Optimization of Surface Roughness in Turning Of En 36 Alloy Steel Using Response Surface Methodology and Genetic Algorithm, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 46, p 6474–6481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.64210.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.642 ↗
37. M. Abdellatief, W.E. Elemam, H. Alanazi, and A.M. Tahwia, Production and Optimization of Sustainable Cement Brick Incorporating Clay Brick Wastes using Response Surface Method, Ceram. Int., 2023, 49(6), p 9395–9411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.14410.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.144 ↗
38. B.S. Mohammed and M. Adamu, Mechanical Performance Of Roller Compacted Concrete Pavement Containing Crumb Rubber and Nano Silica, Constr. Build. Mater., 2018, 159, p 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.09810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.098 ↗
39. R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery, G.G. Vining, C.M. Borror, and S.M. Kowalski, Response Surface Methodology: A Retrospective and Literature Survey, J. Qual. Technol., 2004, 36(1), p 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2004.1198025210.1080/00224065.2004.11980252 ↗
40. A. Garg and A. Bhattacharya, An Insight to the Failure of FDM Parts Under Tensile Loading: Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Study, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2017, 120, p 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.11.03210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.11.032 ↗
41. W. Rajhi, A. B. M. Ali, D. J. Jasim, O. Mehrabi, L. Ben Said, and M. Moradi, "Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Fused Filament Fabrication Parameters for Thermoplastic Polyurethane Parts via Response Surface Methodology," Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 19, p. 3146, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/19/3146.10.3390/math12193146 ↗
42. A. Equbal, A.K. Sood, M.I. Equbal, I.A. Badruddin, and Z.A. Khan, RSM Based Investigation of Compressive Properties of FDM Fabricated Part, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 2021, 35, p 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.08.00410.1016/j.cirpj.2021.08.004 ↗
43. M. Wikło, B.H. Byczuk, and K. Skrzek, Mechanical Characterization of FDM 3D-Printed Components Using Advanced Measurement and Modeling Techniques, Materials, 2025, 18(5), 1086. ([Online]. Available:)10.3390/ma18051086 ↗
44. A. Aminzadeh, M. Aberoumand, D. Rahmatabadi, and M. Moradi, Metaheuristic Approaches for Modeling and Optimization of FDM Process, Fused deposition modeling based 3D printing. H.K. Dave, J.P. Davim Ed., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021, p 483–50410.1007/978-3-030-68024-4_25 ↗
45. M.S. Saad, A. Mohd Nor, M.Z. Zakaria, M.E. Baharudin, and W.S. Yusoff, Modelling and Evolutionary Computation Optimization on FDM Process for Flexural Strength Using Integrated Approach RSM and PSO, Prog. Addit. Manuf., 2021, 6(1), p 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-020-00157-z10.1007/s40964-020-00157-z ↗