Enhancing the Mechanical Performance of Fused Deposition Modeling-Printed Recycled Polypropylene through Annealing Temperature, Duration, and Cooling Method
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examines the effects of annealing temperature, duration, and cooling method on the mechanical properties of FDM-printed recycled polypropylene (PP) parts. The Taguchi experimental design was applied to optimize process conditions, and tensile and impact tests were conducted to evaluate mechanical performance. Results show that impact strength was maximized at 155 degrees C, 1/2 h, and room-temperature cooling, while tensile strength was highest at 55 degrees C, 4 h, and slow cooling. ANOVA and regression analysis confirmed the statistical significance of these parameters, with annealing temperature and duration having the most pronounced effects. SEM analysis revealed that higher temperatures enhanced interlayer bonding, while slow cooling and longer durations improved fracture resistance. Unlike prior studies that examined only individual annealing parameters or used virgin PP, this work systematically explores the combined effects of annealing factors specifically for recycled PP, offering a comprehensive evaluation rarely addressed in the literature. These findings demonstrate that annealing significantly enhances the structural and mechanical performance of recycled PP, offering a sustainable approach to improving FDM-printed components. The results suggest that an intermediate condition (115 degrees C, 2 h, and room cooling) may balance impact and tensile properties, making annealing a viable post-processing technique for high-performance and sustainable polymer applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. F. Kartal and A. Kaptan, Sustainable Reinforcement of PLA Composites with Waste Beech Sawdust for Enhanced 3D-Printing Performance, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-10277-010.1007/s11665-024-10277-0 ↗
2. Y. Fan, P. Jiang, R. Tan, K. Aviso, F. You, X. Zhao, C. Lee, and J. Klemeš, Forecasting Plastic Waste Generation and Interventions for Environmental Hazard Mitigation, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 424(Pt A), 127330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12733010.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127330 ↗
3. G. Anwer and B. Acherjee, Laser Transmission Welding of Polypropylene: Insights into Parameter Interplay, Thermal Analysis, Bonding Quality, Fracture Characteristics, and Weld Morphology, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-09500-910.1007/s11665-024-09500-9 ↗
4. O. Sam-Daliri, T. Flanagan, V. Modi, W. Finnegan, N. Harrison, and P. Ghabezi, Composite Upcycling: An Experimental Study on Mechanical Behaviour of Injection Moulded Parts Prepared from Recycled Material Extrusion Printed Parts, Previously Prepared Using Glass Fibre Polypropylene Composite Industry Waste, J. Clean. Prod., 2025, 499, 145280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.14528010.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145280 ↗
5. R.B. Kristiawan, B. Rusdyanto, F. Imaduddin, and D. Ariawan, Glass Powder Additive on Recycled Polypropylene Filaments: A Sustainable Material in 3D Printing, Polymers, 2021, 14(1), p 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1401000510.3390/polym14010005 ↗
6. R. Sultan, M. Skrifvars, and P. Khalili, 3D Printing of Polypropylene Reinforced with Hemp Fibers: Mechanical, Water Absorption and Morphological Properties, Heliyon, 2024, 10(4), e26617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2661710.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26617 ↗
7. B. Almeshari, H. Junaedi, M. Baig, and A. Almajid, Development of 3D Printing Short Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composite Filaments, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2023, 24, p 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.19810.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.198 ↗
8. R. Arrigo, D. Battegazzore, G. Bernagozzi, F. Cravero, D.N. Ribero Pedraza, and A. Frache, Recycled PP for 3D Printing: Material and Processing Optimization Through Design of Experiment, Appl. Sci., 2022, 12(21), p 10840. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12211084010.3390/app122110840 ↗
9. R. Soundararajan, A. Sathishkumar, S.A. Aathil, and N.G. Chandran, Evaluating Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Surface Roughness of FDM Printed Parts Using PLA Plus Material, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-024-02215-010.1007/s12008-024-02215-0 ↗
10. A. R. Sivanesh, R. Soundararajan, M. Natrayan, J. D. Nallasivam, R. Santhosh, Experimental Study on the Mechanical Behavior of Polyamide 6 with Glass Fiber Composites Fabricated through Fused Deposition Modeling Process. SAE Technical Paper, 2024-01-5043 (2024). https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-01-504310.4271/2024-01-5043 ↗
11. M. Moradi, A. Aminzadeh, D. Rahmatabadi, and S.A. Rasouli, Statistical and Experimental Analysis of Process Parameters of 3D Nylon Printed Parts by Fused Deposition Modeling: Response Surface Modeling and Optimization, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30, p 5441–5454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05848-410.1007/s11665-021-05848-4 ↗
12. D. Rahmatabadi, K. Soltanmohammadi, M. Aberoumand, E. Soleyman, I. Ghasemi, M. Baniassadi, K. Abrinia, M. Bodaghi, and M. Baghani, Development of Pure Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) With Excellent 3D Printability and Macro-and Micro-Structural Properties, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2023, 308, p 2200568. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20220056810.1002/mame.202200568 ↗
13. A. Jayswal and S. Adanur, Effect of Heat Treatment on Crystallinity and Mechanical Properties of Flexible Structures 3D Printed With Fused Deposition Modeling, J. Ind. Text, 2022, 51(2_suppl), p 2616S-2641S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083721106493710.1177/15280837211064937 ↗
14. R. Soundararajan, K. Kaviyarasan, A. Sathishkumar, and J. Muthiya Solomon, Evaluating the Impact of Post-Processing on the Wear and Friction Properties of Polyamide 6 Carbon Fiber Composites Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling, P I Mech. Eng Part. E-J Pro., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408924130000110.1177/09544089241300001 ↗
15. S. Lee, Y. Kim, S. Kim, and J. Kim, Investigation of the Internal Stress Relaxation in FDM 3D Printing: Annealing Conditions, J. Korean Soc. Manuf. Technol. Eng., 2018, 17(4), p 130–136. https://doi.org/10.14775/KSMPE.2018.17.4.13010.14775/KSMPE.2018.17.4.130 ↗
16. A. Saffar, A. Ajji, P. Carreau, and M. Kamal, The Impact of New Crystalline Lamellae Formation During Annealing on the Properties of Polypropylene Based Films and Membranes, Polymer, 2014, 55, p 3156–3167. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLYMER.2014.05.01710.1016/J.POLYMER.2014.05.017 ↗
17. M. Moczadlo, Q. Chen, X. Cheng, Z.J. Smith, E.B. Caldona, and R.C. Advincula, On the 3D Printing of Polypropylene and Post-Processing Optimization of Thermomechanical Properties, MRS Commun., 2023, 13(1), p 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-023-00329-210.1557/s43579-023-00329-2 ↗
18. D. Ferrer-Balas, M.L. Maspoch, A.B. Martinez, and O.O. Santana, Influence of Annealing on the Microstructural, Tensile and Fracture Properties of Polypropylene Films, Polymer, 2001, 42(4), p 1697–1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00487-010.1016/S0032-3861(00)00487-0 ↗
19. P.M. Frontini and A. Fave, The Effect of Annealing Temperature on the Fracture Performance of Isotactic Polypropylene, J. Mater. Sci., 1995, 30, p 2446–2454. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0118459910.1007/BF01184599 ↗
20. J.D. Nallasivam, S. Sundararaj, S.R. Kandavalli, and R. Pradab, Influence of High-Temperature Annealing Parameters on Wear and Friction Mechanisms in Polypropylene Carbon Fiber Composites, SAE Techn. Paper, 2025 https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-500010.4271/2025-01-5000 ↗
21. M. Lorenzoni, J. Odent, E. Rivière-Lorphèvre, L. Spitaels, M.K. Homrani, and F. Ducobu, Preliminary Study on the Impact of Thermal Processing on the Performances of Parts Obtained by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), J. Mater. Forming ESAFORM, 2024, 41, p 100–109. https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903131-1110.21741/9781644903131-11 ↗
22. A. Natayu, A.A. Muhammad, A. Tumada, K. Saptaji, T. Trisnadewi, F. Triawan, A.I. Ramadhan, and A. Azhari, Effect of Annealing on The Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printed PLA, J. Rekayasa Mesin, 2024, 15(3), p 1343–1351. https://doi.org/10.21776/jrm.v15i3.162510.21776/jrm.v15i3.1625 ↗
23. D. Rahmatabadi, E. Soleyman, M.F.M. Bashi, M. Aberoumand, K. Soltanmohammadi, I. Ghasemi, and M. Baghani, 4D Printing and Annealing of PETG Composites Reinforced With Short Carbon Fibers, Phys. Scr., 2024, 99(5), p 055957.10.1088/1402-4896/ad3b40 ↗
24. https://fiberlogy.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/FIBERLOGY_R_PP_TDS.pdf
25. M. Eryildiz, E. Kosa, B. Yavuzer, and İC. Akgün, Determination of the Effective Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polypropylene Parts, J. Test. Eval., 2024, 52(2), p 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE2023028310.1520/JTE20230283 ↗
26. L. Wang, J.E. Sanders, D.J. Gardner, and Y. Han, Effect of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of a Filled Polypropylene, Prog. Addit. Manuf., 2018, 3, p 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0053-310.1007/s40964-018-0053-3 ↗
27. W. Yu, X. Wang, X. Yin, E. Ferraris, and J. Zhang, The Effects of Thermal Annealing on the Performance of Material Extrusion 3D Printed Polymer Parts, Mater. Des., 2023, 226, p 111687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11168710.1016/j.matdes.2023.111687 ↗
28. N. Osaka and K. Hamamoto, Simultaneous Stiffening, Strengthening and Toughening of Poly (Vinylidene Fluoride)/Propylene Carbonate Gels by Thermal Annealing Near Peak Melting Temperature, Polymer, 2018, 141, p 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.00310.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.003 ↗
29. K.R. Hart, R.M. Dunn, and E.D. Wetzel, Increased Fracture Toughness of Additively Manufactured Semi-Crystalline Thermoplastics via Thermal Annealing, Polymer, 2020, 211, p 123091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12309110.1016/j.polymer.2020.123091 ↗
30. J.W. Chen, J. Dai, J.H. Yang, T. Huang, N. Zhang, and Y. Wang, Annealing-Induced Crystalline Structure and Mechanical Property Changes of Polypropylene Random Copolymer, J. Mater. Res., 2013, 28, p 3100–3108. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2013.33210.1557/jmr.2013.332 ↗
31. F. Luo, J. Wang, H. Bai, K. Wang, H. Deng, Q. Zhang, F. Chen, Q. Fu, and B. Na, Synergistic Toughening of Polypropylene Random Copolymer at Low Temperature: β-Modification and Annealing, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528(22–23), p 7052–7059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.05.03010.1016/j.msea.2011.05.030 ↗
32. A. Moumen, M. Tarfaoui, and K. Lafdi, Modelling of the Temperature and Residual Stress Fields During 3D Printing of Polymer Composites, J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 104, p 1661–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03965-y10.1007/s00170-019-03965-y ↗
33. H. Larhrib and J. Wells, Compression of Thermally Treated Polyethylene Glycol 10,000, Int. J. Pharm., 1997, 153, p 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(97)00085-910.1016/S0378-5173(97)00085-9 ↗
34. J. Guo, R. Xiao, C. Tian, and M. Jiang, Optimizing Physical Aging in Poly(ethylene terephthalate)-glycol (PETG), J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 2018, 502, p 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNONCRYSOL.2018.10.02110.1016/J.JNONCRYSOL.2018.10.021 ↗
35. F. Kartal and A. Kaptan, Effects of Annealing Temperature and Duration on Mechanical Properties of PLA Plastics Produced by 3D Printing, Eur. Mech. Sci, 2023, 7(3), p 152–159. https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.129096110.26701/ems.1290961 ↗
36. Y. Hirai, S. Yoshida, and N. Takagi, Defect Analysis in Thermal Nanoimprint Lithography, J. Vac. Sci, 2003, 21, p 2765–2770. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.162928910.1116/1.1629289 ↗
37. M.I. Qazi, R. Akhtar, and M. Abas, An Integrated Approach of GRA Coupled With Principal Component Analysis for Multi-Optimization of Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) Process, Materials, 2020, 13(16), p 3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1316345710.3390/ma13163457 ↗
38. Q. Li, T. Yin, X. Li, and S. Zhang, Effects of Rapid Cooling Treatment on Heated Sandstone: A Comparison Between Water and Liquid Nitrogen Cooling, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 2020, 79, p 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01571-610.1007/s10064-019-01571-6 ↗
39. J. Liu, D. Das, F. Yang, A.G. Schwartz, G.M. Genin, S. Thomopoulos, and I. Chasiotis, Energy Dissipation in Mammalian Collagen Fibrils: Cyclic Strain-Induced Damping, Toughening, and Strengthening, Acta. Biomater., 2018, 80, p 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.02710.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.027 ↗
40. I. Cudnik and J. Andrzejewski, Preparation and evaluation of the properties of FDM printed materials made from waste-origin polymers, Advances in Manufacturing IV. Manufacturing 2024, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. B. Gapiński, O. Ciszak, V. Ivanov, J.M. Machado Ed., Springer, Cham, 2024, p 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56463-5_1610.1007/978-3-031-56463-5_16 ↗
41. A. Tominaga, H. Sekiguchi, R. Nakano, S. Yao, and E. Takatori, Advanced Recycling Process for Waste Plastics Based on Physical Degradation Theory and Its Stability, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 2019, 21, p 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0777-710.1007/s10163-018-0777-7 ↗