Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Fatigue Strength in Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Parts: A Sensitivity Analysis of Input Features
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) Ti-6Al-4 V parts exhibit variable fatigue strength due to inherent processing defects such as high residual stress, rough surface finish, subsurface and internal pores, and a brittle metastable microstructure. Traditional models often fail to predict this fatigue strength accurately due to the complexities involved. This study employs machine learning (ML) to analyze the sensitivity of various input features on fatigue strength predictions for LPBF-produced Ti-6Al-4 V parts. Through feature sensitivity analysis and testing of different feature selection methods, critical predictors such as surface roughness, stress intensity factor (Δ K th ), hot isostatic pressure (HIP) and elongation at break were identified. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset derived from 55 studies, a gradient boosting decision tree model was refined through feature selection, demonstrating a prediction accuracy with an R 2 of 80%. Moreover, incorporating these sensitive features into ML models significantly enhances prediction reliability and offers insights into the critical factors affecting fatigue strength in LPBF. This research also contributes to the understanding of feature selection in the context of additive manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Z. Zhan, N. Ao, Y. Hu, and C. Liu, Defect-Induced Fatigue Scattering and Assessment of Additively Manufactured 300M-AerMet100 Steel: An Investigation Based on Experiments and Machine Learning, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2022, 264, p 108352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10835210.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108352 ↗
2. T.H. Becker, N.M. Dhansay, H.G.M. Ter, and K. Vanmeensel, Near-Threshold Fatigue Crack Growth Rates of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Produced Ti-6Al-4V, Acta Mater., 2020, 197, p 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.04910.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.049 ↗
3. H. Bao, S. Wu, Z. Wu, G. Kang, X. Peng, and P.J. Withers, A Machine-Learning Fatigue Life Prediction Approach of Additively Manufactured Metals, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2021, 242, p 107508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10750810.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107508 ↗
4. N. Sanaei and A. Fatemi, Analysis of the Effect of Surface Roughness on Fatigue Performance of Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufactured Metals, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2020, 108, p 102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10263810.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102638 ↗
5. J. Günther, D. Krewerth, T. Lippmann, S. Leuders, T. Tröster, A. Weidner et al., Fatigue Life of Additively Manufactured Ti–6Al–4V in the Very High Cycle Fatigue Regime, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 94, p 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.018 ↗
6. J. Chen and Y. Liu, Fatigue Property Prediction of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Using Probabilistic Physics-Guided Learning, Addit. Manuf., 2021, 39, p 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10187610.1016/j.addma.2021.101876 ↗
7. Z. Zhan and H. Li, Machine Learning Based Fatigue Life Prediction with Effects of Additive Manufacturing Process Parameters for Printed SS 316L, Int. J. Fatigue, 2021, 142, p 105941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10594110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105941 ↗
8. G. Nicoletto, Efficient Determination of Influence Factors in Fatigue of Additive Manufactured Metals, Procedia Struct. Integr., 2018, 8, p 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.02010.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.020 ↗
9. J. Smith, W. Xiong, W. Yan, S. Lin, P. Cheng, O.L. Kafka et al., Linking Process, Structure, Property, and Performance for Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing: Computational Approaches with Experimental Support, Comput. Mech., 2016, 57, p 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1240-410.1007/s00466-015-1240-4 ↗
10. Y. Kok, X.P. Tan, P. Wang, M.L.S. Nai, N.H. Loh, E. Liu et al., Anisotropy and Heterogeneity of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties in Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Critical Review, Mater. Des., 2018, 139, p 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.02110.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.021 ↗
11. M. Tang and P.C. Pistorius, Fatigue Life Prediction for AlSi10Mg Components Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 125, p 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.015 ↗
12. W. Yan, S. Lin, O.L. Kafka, Y. Lian, C. Yu, Z. Liu et al., Data-Driven Multi-Scale Multi-Physics Models to Derive Process–Structure–Property Relationships for Additive Manufacturing, Comput. Mech., 2018, 61, p 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1539-z10.1007/s00466-018-1539-z ↗
13. M. Zhang, C.-N. Sun, X. Zhang, J. Wei, D. Hardacre, and H. Li, Predictive Models for Fatigue Property of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Stainless Steel 316L, Mater. Des., 2018, 145, p 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.05410.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.054 ↗
14. A.M. Aboutaleb, L. Bian, A. Elwany, N. Shamsaei, S.M. Thompson, and G. Tapia, Accelerated Process Optimization for Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing by Leveraging Similar Prior Studies, IISE Trans., 2017, 49, p 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2016.118962910.1080/0740817X.2016.1189629 ↗
15. C. Wang, X.P. Tan, S.B. Tor, and C.S. Lim, Machine Learning in Additive Manufacturing: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 36, p 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10153810.1016/j.addma.2020.101538 ↗
16. M. Zhang, C.-N. Sun, X. Zhang, P.C. Goh, J. Wei, D. Hardacre et al., High Cycle Fatigue Life Prediction of Laser Additive Manufactured Stainless Steel: A Machine Learning Approach, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 128, p 105194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10519410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105194 ↗
17. X. Qi, G. Chen, Y. Li, X. Cheng, and C. Li, Applying Neural-Network-Based Machine Learning to Additive Manufacturing: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives, Engineering, 2019, 5, p 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.04.01210.1016/j.eng.2019.04.012 ↗
18. Z. Zhan and H. Li, A Novel Approach Based on the Elastoplastic Fatigue Damage and Machine Learning Models for Life Prediction of Aerospace Alloy Parts Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing, Int. J. Fatigue, 2021, 145, p 106089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10608910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106089 ↗
19. R. Balamurugan, J. Chen, C. Meng, and Y. Liu, Data-Driven Approaches for Fatigue Prediction of Ti–6Al–4V Parts Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion, Int. J. Fatigue, 2024, 182, p 108167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10816710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108167 ↗
20. L. Xiao, G. Wang, W. Long, P.K. Liaw, and J. Ren, Fatigue Life Prediction of the FCC-Based Multi-Principal Element Alloys Via Domain Knowledge-Based Machine Learning, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2024, 296, p 109860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.10986010.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.109860 ↗
21. N.J. Sai, P. Rathore, and A. Chauhan, Machine Learning-Based Predictions of Fatigue Life for Multi-Principal Element Alloys, Scr. Mater., 2023, 226, p 115214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.11521410.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115214 ↗
22. S. Swetlana, A. Rout, and A.K. Singh, Machine Learning Assisted Interpretation of Creep and Fatigue Life in Titanium Alloys, APL Mach. Learn., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.012903710.1063/5.0129037 ↗
23. J. Li, Z. Yang, G. Qian, and F. Berto, Machine Learning Based Very-High-Cycle Fatigue Life Prediction of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting, Int. J. Fatigue, 2022, 158, p 106764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10676410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106764 ↗
24. V. Venkatesh, R. Noraas, A. Pilchak, S. Tamirisa, K. Calvert, A. Salem et al., Data Driven Tools and Methods for Microtexture Classification and Dwell Fatigue Life Prediction in Dual Phase Titanium Alloys, MATEC Web of Conferences, 2020, 321, p 11091. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20203211109110.1051/matecconf/202032111091 ↗
25. M. Dash and H. Liu, Feature Selection for Classification, Intelligent Data Analysis, 1997, 1, p 131–156. https://doi.org/10.3233/IDA-1997-130210.3233/IDA-1997-1302 ↗
26. Sánchez-Maroño N, Alonso-Betanzos A, Tombilla-Sanromán M. Filter Methods for Feature Selection – A Comparative Study. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - IDEAL 2007, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; n.d., p. 178–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77226-2_19.10.1007/978-3-540-77226-2_19 ↗
27. D.L. Naik and R. Kiran, A Novel Sensitivity-Based Method for Feature Selection, J Big Data, 2021, 8, p 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00515-w10.1186/s40537-021-00515-w ↗
28. G. Chandrashekar and F. Sahin, A Survey on Feature Selection Methods, Comput. Electr. Eng., 2014, 40, p 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.02410.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024 ↗
29. V. Bolón-Canedo, N. Sánchez-Maroño, A. Alonso-Betanzos, J.M. Benítez, and F. Herrera, A Review of Microarray Datasets and Applied Feature Selection Methods, Inf. Sci. (N Y), 2014, 282, p 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.05.04210.1016/j.ins.2014.05.042 ↗
30. J. Li, K. Cheng, S. Wang, F. Morstatter, R.P. Trevino, J. Tang et al., Feature Selection, ACM Comput. Surv., 2018, 50, p 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/313662510.1145/3136625 ↗
31. W. Gao, L. Hu, P. Zhang, and J. He, Feature Selection Considering the Composition of Feature Relevancy, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2018, 112, p 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2018.06.00510.1016/j.patrec.2018.06.005 ↗
32. J. Cai, J. Luo, S. Wang, and S. Yang, Feature Selection in Machine Learning: A New Perspective, Neurocomputing, 2018, 300, p 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.07710.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.077 ↗
33. Cutolo A, Elangeswaran C, de Formanoir C, Muralidharan GK, Van Hooreweder B. Effect of Heat Treatments on Fatigue Properties of Ti–6Al–4V and 316L Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion in As-Built Surface Condition, 2019, p. 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05861-6_36.10.1007/978-3-030-05861-6_36 ↗
34. R. Xin, L. Lan, C. Bai, S. Gao, B. He, and J. Wang, Fatigue Properties of Selective Laser Melted Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Subjected to Laser Shock Processing, J. Mater. Sci., 2022, 57, p 9619–9630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07019-910.1007/s10853-022-07019-9 ↗
35. K. Dietrich, J. Diller, S. Dubiez-Le Goff, D. Bauer, P. Forêt, and G. Witt, The Influence of Oxygen on the Chemical Composition and Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V During Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF), Addit. Manuf., 2020, 32, p 100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10098010.1016/j.addma.2019.100980 ↗
36. C.N. Kelly, C. Kahra, H.J. Maier, and K. Gall, Processing, Structure, and Properties of Additively Manufactured Titanium Scaffolds with Gyroid-Sheet Architecture, Addit. Manuf., 2021, 41, p 101916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10191610.1016/j.addma.2021.101916 ↗
37. A. Soltani-Tehrani, M. Habibnejad-Korayem, S. Shao, M. Haghshenas, and N. Shamsaei, Ti-6Al-4V Powder Characteristics in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: The Effect on Tensile and Fatigue Behavior, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 51, p 102584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10258410.1016/j.addma.2021.102584 ↗
38. A. du Plessis, N. Razavi, D. Wan, F. Berto, A. Imdaadulah, C. Beamer et al., Fatigue Performance of Shelled Additively Manufactured Parts Subjected to Hot Isostatic Pressing, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 51, p 102607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10260710.1016/j.addma.2022.102607 ↗
39. S.R. Yeratapally, C.G. Lang, A.R. Cerrone, G.L. Niebur, and K. Cronberger, Effect of Defects on the Constant-Amplitude Fatigue Behavior of As-Built Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process: Assessing Performance with Metallographic Analysis and Micromechanical Simulations, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 52, p 102639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10263910.1016/j.addma.2022.102639 ↗
40. M. Asherloo, Z. Wu, M. Heim, D. Nelson, M. Paliwal, A.D. Rollett et al., Fatigue Performance of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Hydride-Dehydride Ti-6Al-4V Powder, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 59, p 103117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10311710.1016/j.addma.2022.103117 ↗
41. L. Bhandari and V. Gaur, On Study of Process Induced Defects-Based Fatigue Performance of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 60, p 103227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10322710.1016/j.addma.2022.103227 ↗
42. A. Gupta, C.J. Bennett, and W. Sun, High Cycle Fatigue Performance Evaluation of a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Bracket for Aero-Engine Applications, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2022, 140, p 106494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10649410.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106494 ↗
43. B. Chen, Z. Wu, T. Yan, Z. He, B. Sun, G. Guo et al., Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Laser Powder Bed Fused Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Under Post-Heat Treatment, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2022, 261, p 108264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10826410.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108264 ↗
44. H. Yu, F. Li, Z. Wang, and X. Zeng, Fatigue Performances of Selective Laser Melted Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: Influence of Surface Finishing, Hot Isostatic Pressing and Heat Treatments, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 120, p 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.01910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.019 ↗
45. B. Vayssette, N. Saintier, C. Brugger, M. El May, and E. Pessard, Numerical Modelling of Surface Roughness Effect on the Fatigue Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Obtained by Additive Manufacturing, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 123, p 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.014 ↗
46. P. Li, D.H. Warner, J.W. Pegues, M.D. Roach, N. Shamsaei, and N. Phan, Towards Predicting Differences in Fatigue Performance of Laser Powder Bed Fused Ti-6Al-4V Coupons from the Same Build, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 126, p 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.05.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.05.004 ↗
47. M. Kahlin, H. Ansell, D. Basu, A. Kerwin, L. Newton, B. Smith et al., Improved Fatigue Strength of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V by Surface Post Processing, Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 134, p 105497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10549710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105497 ↗
48. V.-D. Le, E. Pessard, F. Morel, and S. Prigent, Fatigue Behaviour of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V alloy: The Role of Defects on Scatter and Statistical Size Effect, Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 140, p 105811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10581110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105811 ↗
49. M. Dallago, S. Raghavendra, V. Luchin, G. Zappini, D. Pasini, and M. Benedetti, The Role of Node Fillet, Unit-Cell Size and Strut Orientation on the Fatigue Strength of Ti-6Al-4V Lattice Materials Additively Manufactured Via Laser Powder Bed Fusion, Int. J. Fatigue, 2021, 142, p 105946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10594610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105946 ↗
50. R. Molaei and A. Fatemi, Fatigue Performance of Additive Manufactured Metals Under Variable Amplitude Service Loading Conditions Including Multiaxial Stresses and Notch Effects: Experiments and Modelling, Int. J. Fatigue, 2021, 145, p 106002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10600210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106002 ↗
51. X. Gao, C. Tao, S. Wu, B. Chen, and S. Wu, X-ray Imaging of Defect Population and the Effect on High Cycle Fatigue Life of Laser Additive Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloys, Int. J. Fatigue, 2022, 162, p 106979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10697910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106979 ↗
52. L. Emanuelli, A. Molinari, L. Facchini, E. Sbettega, S. Carmignato, M. Bandini et al., Effect of Heat Treatment Temperature and Turning Residual Stresses on the Plain and Notch Fatigue Strength of Ti-6Al-4V Additively Manufactured Via Laser Powder Bed Fusion, Int. J. Fatigue, 2022, 162, p 107009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10700910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107009 ↗
53. J.M. Alegre, A. Díaz, R. García, L.B. Peral, and I.I. Cuesta, Effect of HIP Post-Processing at 850 °C/200 MPa in the Fatigue Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting, Int. J. Fatigue, 2022, 163, p 107097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10709710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107097 ↗
54. X. Yan, S. Yin, C. Chen, C. Huang, R. Bolot, R. Lupoi et al., Effect of Heat Treatment on the Phase Transformation and Mechanical Properties of Ti6Al4V Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 764, p 1056–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.07610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.076 ↗
55. J. Karimi, M. Antonov, L. Kollo, and K.G. Prashanth, Role of Laser Remelting and Heat Treatment in Mechanical and Tribological Properties of Selective Laser Melted Ti6Al4V Alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 2022, 897, p 163207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16320710.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163207 ↗
56. X. Zhao, S. Li, M. Zhang, Y. Liu, T.B. Sercombe, S. Wang et al., Comparison of the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Ti–6Al–4V Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting, Mater. Des., 2016, 95, p 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.13510.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.135 ↗
57. Y.N. Hu, S.C. Wu, P.J. Withers, J. Zhang, H.Y.X. Bao, Y.N. Fu et al., The Effect of Manufacturing Defects on the Fatigue Life of Selective Laser Melted Ti-6Al-4V Structures, Mater. Des., 2020, 192, p 108708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10870810.1016/j.matdes.2020.108708 ↗
58. A. Cutolo, C. Elangeswaran, G.K. Muralidharan, and B. Van Hooreweder, On the Role of Building Orientation and Surface Post-Processes on the Fatigue Life of Ti-6Al-4V Coupons Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2022, 840, p 142747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14274710.1016/j.msea.2022.142747 ↗
59. C.N. Kelly, N.T. Evans, C.W. Irvin, S.C. Chapman, K. Gall, and D.L. Safranski, The Effect of Surface Topography and Porosity on the Tensile Fatigue of 3D Printed Ti-6Al-4V Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 2019, 98, p 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.02410.1016/j.msec.2019.01.024 ↗
60. E. Wycisk, A. Solbach, S. Siddique, D. Herzog, F. Walther, and C. Emmelmann, Effects of Defects in Laser Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V on Fatigue Properties, Phys. Procedia, 2014, 56, p 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.12010.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.120 ↗
61. M. Benedetti, M. Cazzolli, V. Fontanari, and M. Leoni, Fatigue limit of Ti6Al4V alloy produced by Selective Laser Sintering, Procedia Struct. Integr., 2016, 2, p 3158–3167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.39410.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.394 ↗
62. N. Razavi, P. Ferro, F. Berto, and J. Torgersen, Fatigue Strength of Blunt V-Notched Specimens Produced by Selective Laser Melting of Ti-6Al-4V, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2018, 97, p 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.06.02110.1016/j.tafmec.2017.06.021 ↗
63. M. Qiang Chu, S. Yan Zhang, Su.G. Qiao, R. Gen Ding, L. Wang, and S. Padde, Research on Post-processing Microstructure and Property of Titanium Components with Selective Laser Melting (SLM), IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020, 751, p 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/751/1/01207910.1088/1757-899X/751/1/012079 ↗
64. S.E. Brika and V. Brailovski, Influence of Powder Particle Morphology on the Static and Fatigue Properties of Laser Powder Bed-Fused Ti-6Al-4V Components, J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2020, 4, p 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp404010710.3390/jmmp4040107 ↗
65. E.H. Jimenez, A. Kreitcberg, E. Moquin, and V. Brailovski, Influence of Post-Processing Conditions on the Microstructure, Static, and Fatigue Resistance of Laser Powder Bed Fused Ti-6Al-4V Components, J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2022, 6, p 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp604008510.3390/jmmp6040085 ↗
66. M. Fousová, D. Vojtěch, K. Doubrava, M. Daniel, and C.-F. Lin, Influence of Inherent Surface and Internal Defects on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy: Comparison between Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting, Materials, 2018, 11, p 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1104053710.3390/ma11040537 ↗
67. T.P. Moran, P.E. Carrion, S. Lee, N. Shamsaei, N. Phan, and D.H. Warner, Hot Isostatic Pressing for Fatigue Critical Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Materials, 2022, 15, p 2051. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1506205110.3390/ma15062051 ↗
68. O. Dolev, T. Ron, E. Aghion, and A. Shirizly, Effect of HIP Defects on the Mechanical Properties of Additive Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy, Metals (Basel), 2022, 12, p 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1207121010.3390/met12071210 ↗
69. L. Bhandari and V. Gaur, Different Post-Processing Methods to Improve Fatigue Properties of Additively Built Ti-6Al-4V Alloy, Int. J. Fatigue, 2023, 176, p 107850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10785010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107850 ↗
70. R. Jones, J.G. Michopoulos, A.P. Iliopoulos, R.K. Singh Raman, N. Phan, and T. Nguyen, Representing Crack Growth in Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 116, p 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.01910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.019 ↗
71. N. Macallister, K. Vanmeensel, and T.H. Becker, Fatigue crack growth parameters of Laser Powder Bed Fusion produced Ti-6Al-4V, Int. J. Fatigue, 2021, 145, p 106100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10610010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106100 ↗
72. L. Barricelli, L. Patriarca, A. du Plessis, and S. Beretta, Orientation-Dependent Fatigue Assessment of Ti6Al4V Manufactured by L-PBF: Size of Surface Features and Shielding Effect, Int. J. Fatigue, 2023, 168, p 107401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10740110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107401 ↗
73. J.J. Bhattacharyya, S. Nair, D.C. Pagan, V. Tari, A.D. Rollett, and S.R. Agnew, In-Situ High Energy X-ray Diffraction Study of the Elastic Response of a Metastable β-Titanium Alloy, Acta Mater., 2020, 197, p 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.05010.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.050 ↗
74. B. Vayssette, N. Saintier, C. Brugger, M. Elmay, and E. Pessard, Surface roughness of Ti-6Al-4V parts obtained by SLM and EBM: Effect on the High Cycle Fatigue life, Procedia Eng, 2018, 213, p 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.01010.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.010 ↗
75. J. Pegues, M. Roach, R. Scott Williamson, and N. Shamsaei, Surface Roughness Effects on the Fatigue Strength of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 116, p 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.01310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.013 ↗
76. S. Lee, B. Rasoolian, D.F. Silva, J.W. Pegues, and N. Shamsaei, Surface Roughness Parameter and Modeling for Fatigue Behavior of Additive Manufactured Parts: A Non-Destructive Data-Driven Approach, Addit. Manuf., 2021, 46, p 102094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10209410.1016/j.addma.2021.102094 ↗
77. V. Cain, L. Thijs, J. Van Humbeeck, B. Van Hooreweder, and R. Knutsen, Crack Propagation and Fracture Toughness of Ti6Al4V Alloy Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Addit. Manuf., 2015, 5, p 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.12.00610.1016/j.addma.2014.12.006 ↗
78. A. Fatemi, R. Molaei, S. Sharifimehr, N. Phan, and N. Shamsaei, Multiaxial Fatigue Behavior of Wrought and Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Including Surface Finish Effect, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 100, p 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.04410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.044 ↗
79. D. Greitemeier, F. Palm, F. Syassen, and T. Melz, Fatigue Performance of Additive Manufactured TiAl6V4 Using Electron and Laser Beam Melting, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 94, p 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.001 ↗
80. N. Macallister and T.H. Becker, Fatigue Life Estimation of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V: Sensitivity, Scatter and Defect Description in Damage-Tolerant Models, Acta Mater., 2022, 237, p 118189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11818910.1016/j.actamat.2022.118189 ↗
81. M. Kahlin, H. Ansell, and J.J. Moverare, Fatigue Behaviour of Notched Additive Manufactured Ti6Al4V with As-Built Surfaces, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 101, p 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.04.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.04.009 ↗
82. M. Benedetti and C. Santus, Notch Fatigue and Crack Growth Resistance of Ti-6Al-4V ELI Additively Manufactured Via Selective Laser Melting: A Critical Distance Approach to Defect Sensitivity, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 121, p 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.12.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.12.020 ↗
83. M. Andrew Hills, J. Scott Malcolm, N. Mohamed Dhansay, and B.T. Hermann, High Cycle Fatigue Strength of Hot Isostatically Pressed and Chemically Etched Laser Powder Bed Fusion Produced Ti-6Al-4V, Int. J. Fatigue, 2023, 175, p 107774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10777410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107774 ↗
84. S. Bagehorn, J. Wehr, and H.J. Maier, Application of Mechanical Surface Finishing Processes for Roughness Reduction and Fatigue Improvement of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Parts, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 102, p 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.05.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.05.008 ↗
85. M. Benedetti, V. Fontanari, M. Bandini, F. Zanini, and S. Carmignato, Low- and High-Cycle Fatigue Resistance of Ti-6Al-4V ELI Additively Manufactured Via Selective Laser Melting: Mean Stress and Defect Sensitivity, Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 107, p 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.021 ↗
86. Y.Y. Sun, S.L. Lu, S. Gulizia, C.H. Oh, D. Fraser, M. Leary et al., Fatigue Performance of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V: Surface Condition vs, Internal Defects. JOM, 2020, 72, p 1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04025-710.1007/s11837-020-04025-7 ↗
87. H. Ye, F. Le, C. Wei, K. Ye, S. Liu, and G. Wang, Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Fabricated Via Laser Metal Deposition: Effects of Building Orientation and Heat Treatment, J. Alloys Compd., 2021, 868, p 159023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15902310.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159023 ↗
88. Q. Liu, H. Wu, M.J. Paul, P. He, Z. Peng, B. Gludovatz et al., Machine-Learning Assisted Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Optimization for AlSi10Mg: New Microstructure Description Indices and Fracture Mechanisms, Acta Mater., 2020, 201, p 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.01010.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.010 ↗
89. B.L. Boyce and R.O. Ritchie, Effect of Load Ratio and Maximum Stress Intensity on the Fatigue Threshold in Ti–6Al–4V, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2001, 68, p 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00099-010.1016/S0013-7944(00)00099-0 ↗
90. T.H. Becker, P. Kumar, and U. Ramamurty, Fracture and Fatigue in Additively Manufactured Metals, Acta Mater., 2021, 219, p 117240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11724010.1016/j.actamat.2021.117240 ↗
91. Y. Murakami, Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Nonmetallic Inclusions, Academic Press, San Diego, 2019.
92. U. Zerbst, G. Bruno, J.-Y. Buffière, T. Wegener, T. Niendorf, T. Wu et al., Damage Tolerant Design of Additively Manufactured Metallic Components Subjected to Cyclic Loading: State of the Art and Challenges, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2021, 121, p 100786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10078610.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100786 ↗
93. N. Macallister, S. Chellu, T. Riemslag, S.P. Scott, C. Ayas, V. Popovich et al., Sub-Size Specimen Testing for Near-Threshold Fatigue Crack Behaviour of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Materialia (Oxf), 2023, 30, p 101852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2023.10185210.1016/j.mtla.2023.101852 ↗
94. Y.J. Yin, J.Q. Sun, J. Guo, X.F. Kan, and D.C. Yang, Mechanism of High Yield Strength and Yield Ratio of 316 L Stainless Steel by Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 744, p 773–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.09210.1016/j.msea.2018.12.092 ↗
95. Z. Sun, X. Tan, S.B. Tor, and C.K. Chua, Simultaneously Enhanced Strength and Ductility for 3D-Printed Stainless Steel 316L by Selective Laser Melting, NPG Asia Mater., 2018, 10, p 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-018-0018-510.1038/s41427-018-0018-5 ↗
96. Y.M. Wang, T. Voisin, J.T. McKeown, J. Ye, N.P. Calta, Z. Li et al., Additively Manufactured Hierarchical Stainless Steels with High Strength and Ductility, Nat. Mater., 2018, 17, p 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat502110.1038/nmat5021 ↗
97. S. Romano, P.D. Nezhadfar, N. Shamsaei, M. Seifi, and S. Beretta, High Cycle Fatigue Behavior and Life Prediction for Additively Manufactured 17–4 PH Stainless Steel: Effect of Sub-Surface Porosity and Surface Roughness, Theoret. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2020, 106, p 102477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10247710.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102477 ↗
98. E. Brandl, U. Heckenberger, V. Holzinger, and D. Buchbinder, Additive Manufactured AlSi10Mg Samples Using Selective Laser Melting (SLM): Microstructure, High Cycle Fatigue, and Fracture Behavior, Mater. Des., 2012, 34, p 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.06710.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.067 ↗
99. P. Edwards and M. Ramulu, Fatigue Performance Evaluation of Selective Laser Melted Ti–6Al–4V, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 598, p 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.04110.1016/j.msea.2014.01.041 ↗
100. A. Yadollahi, J. Simsiriwong, S.M. Thompson, and N. Shamsaei, Data Demonstrating the Effects of Build Orientation and Heat Treatment on Fatigue Behavior of Selective Laser Melted 17–4 PH Stainless Steel, Data Brief, 2016, 7, p 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.01310.1016/j.dib.2016.02.013 ↗