Comparative Mechanical and Energy Absorption Performance of 3D Printed Bioinspired Bovine Bone and Hybrid TPMS Structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. M. Kucewicz, P. Baranowski, J. Małachowski, A. Popławski, and P. Płatek, Modelling, and Characterization of 3D Printed Cellular Structures, Mater. Des., 2018, 142, p 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.02810.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.028 ↗
2. M.J. Silva and L.J. Gibson, Modeling the Mechanical Behavior of Vertebral Trabecular Bone: Effects of Age-Related Changes in Microstructure, Bone, 1997, 21(2), p 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00100-210.1016/S8756-3282(97)00100-2 ↗
3. A.I. Ansari and N.A. Sheikh, A Review of Bone Regeneration Mechanisms and Bone Scaffold Fabrication Techniques (Conventional and Non-Conventional), J. Inst. Eng. (India) Series C, 2022, 103(6), p 1485-1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-022-00880-210.1007/s40032-022-00880-2 ↗
4. S. Linforth et al., Unsaturated Soil Blast: Flying Plate Experiment and Numerical Investigations, Int. J. Impact Eng, 2019, 125, p 212-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.002 ↗
5. M.F. Ashby, The Properties of Foams and Lattices, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 2006, 364(1838), p 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.167810.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
6. M.F. Ashby, Mechanical Properties of Cellular Solids, Metall. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci., 1983, 14A, p 1755-1769. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264554610.1007/BF02645546 ↗
7. W. Yang and J. McKittrick, Separating the Influence of the Cortex and Foam on the Mechanical Properties of Porcupine Quills, Acta Biomater., 2013, 9(11), p 9065-9074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.00410.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.004 ↗
8. C. Qi, A. Remennikov, L.Z. Pei, S. Yang, Z.H. Yu, and T.D. Ngo, Impact and Close-in Blast Response of Auxetic Honeycomb-Cored Sandwich Panels: Experimental Tests and Numerical Simulations, Compos. Struct., 2017, 180, p 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.020 ↗
9. S.H. Ralston, Bone Structure and Metabolism, Medicine, 2013, 41(10), p 581-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2013.07.00710.1016/j.mpmed.2013.07.007 ↗
10. A. Ghazlan et al., A Bio-Mimetic Cellular Structure for Mitigating the Effects of Impulsive Loadings - A Numerical Study, J. Sandwich Struct. Mater., 2021, 23(6), p 1929-1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/109963622090858110.1177/1099636220908581 ↗
11. L. Han and S. Che, An Overview of Materials with Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces and Related Geometry: From Biological Structures to Self-Assembled Systems, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(17), p 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170570810.1002/adma.201705708 ↗
12. M. Kumar, R. Ramakrishnan, and A. Omarbekova, 3D Printed Polycarbonate Reinforced Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Composites: Composition Effects on Mechanical Properties, Micro-Structure and Void Formation Study, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 2019, 33(11), p 5219-5226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-1011-910.1007/s12206-019-1011-9 ↗
13. M.N.V.R.L. Kumar and R. Ramakrishnan, Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis of 3D Printed Polycarbonate/Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Composite Loaded with Tetrabromobiphenol-A and Microcrystalline Cellulose, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31(12), p 10071-10080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-07051-510.1007/s11665-022-07051-5 ↗
14. C. Yan et al., “Design of TPMS structures,” Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Lattices Additively Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting, no. September, pp. 27-38, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-824438-8.00002-9.10.1016/b978-0-12-824438-8.00002-9 ↗
15. A.I. Ansari, N.A. Sheikh, and N. Kumar, High Strain Rate Testing of Hybrid TPMS Structures, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-05002-w10.1007/s40430-024-05002-w ↗
16. L. J. Gibson and G. Editor, “Cellular Solids,” no. APRIL 2003, pp. 270-274, 2021.10.1557/mrs2003.79 ↗
17. R. Oftadeh, M. Perez-Viloria, J.C. Villa-Camacho, A. Vaziri, and A. Nazarian, Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Trabecular Bone: A Review, J. Biomech. Eng., 2015 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402917610.1115/1.4029176 ↗
18. P.K. Zysset, A Review of Morphology-Elasticity Relationships in Human Trabecular Bone: Theories and Experiments, J. Biomech., 2003, 36(10), p 1469-1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00128-310.1016/S0021-9290(03)00128-3 ↗
19. T. M. Keaveny, E. F. Morgan, G. L. Niebur, and O. C. Yeh, “Biomechanics of Trabecular Bone,” 2025. [Online]. Available: www.annualreviews.org.
20. B.L.S. Ang et al., The Effect of Specimen Geometry on the Mechanical Behavior of Trabecular Bone Specimens, Solid State Phenom., 2012, 185(4), p 129-132. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.185.12910.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.185.129 ↗
21. J.-Y. Rho, T.Y. Tsui, and G.M. Pharr, Elastic Properties of Human Cortical and Trabecular Lamellar Bone Measured by Nanoindentation, Biomaterials, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00073-210.1016/S0142-9612(97)00073-2 ↗
22. B. Wang, B. Zhou, and X. Zhang, A High Toughness and Light Weight Armor Structure Bioinspired Design Based on a Bovine Hoof Wall, Mater. Lett., 2020, 264, 127296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12729610.1016/j.matlet.2020.127296 ↗
23. Z. She et al., A Hollow Optimized Simple Cubic Lattice Structure Based on the TPMS Geometry, Acta Mech. Solida Sin., 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-025-00595-810.1007/s10338-025-00595-8 ↗
24. F. Sadeghi, M. Baniassadi, A. Shahidi, and M. Baghani, TPMS Metamaterial Structures Based on Shape Memory Polymers: Mechanical, Thermal and Thermomechanical Assessment, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2023, 23, p 3726-3743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.01410.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.014 ↗
25. D.W. Abueidda, R.K. Abu Al-Rub, A.S. Dalaq, D.W. Lee, K.A. Khan, and I. Jasiuk, Effective Conductivities and Elastic Moduli of Novel Foams with Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces, Mech. Mater., 2016, 95, p 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.01.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2016.01.004 ↗
26. R. Ramakrishnan, J. Hemanth Kumar, F. Titus, P. Maharshi, and R. Nithish, Experimental Investigation of 3D Printed Bio-Inspired Xylotus Lattice Structure for Energy Absorption Under Quasi-Static Axial Loading Conditions, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl., 2024, 238(10), p 1942-1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420724123685610.1177/14644207241236856 ↗
27. I. Maskery, L.A. Parry, D. Padrão, R.J.M. Hague, and I.A. Ashcroft, FLatt Pack: A Research-Focussed Lattice Design Program, Addit. Manuf., 2021, 49, p 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10251010.1016/j.addma.2021.102510 ↗
28. S. Daynes, TPMS-Based Metamaterials with Tuneable Elastic Anisotropy and Mechanical Coupling, Mater. Des., 2025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2025.11386610.1016/j.matdes.2025.113866 ↗
29. A.E. Simone and L.J. Gibson, Effects of Solid Distribution on the Stiffness, Acta Mater., 1998, 46(6), p 2139-2150.10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00421-7 ↗
30. M. F. Ashby, A. Evans, N. A. Fleck, L. J. Gibson, J. W. Hutchinson, and N. G. Hayden, “Book Reviews. Metal foams: a design guide,” vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 287-Unknown, [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23788121
31. J.H. Kumar, R. Ramakrishnan, A. Elkaseer, G. Venkatachalam, and P.S. Velu, Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of 3D Printed Sandwich Composite with Polylactic Acid-Micro-crystalline Cellulose Bio-inspired Xylotus Lattice Core: Energy Absorption and Crashworthiness, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-025-11518-610.1007/s11665-025-11518-6 ↗
32. E. Novitskaya et al., Recent Advances on the Measurement and Calculation of the Elastic Moduli of Cortical and Trabecular Bone: A Review, Theor. Appl. Mech., 2011, 38(3), p 209-297. https://doi.org/10.2298/tam1103209n10.2298/tam1103209n ↗
33. D. Wu, P. Isaksson, S.J. Ferguson, and C. Persson, Young’s Modulus of Trabecular Bone at the Tissue Level: A Review, Acta Biomater., 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.00110.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.001 ↗
34. Y.N. Yeni and D.P. Fyhrie, Finite Element Calculated Uniaxial Apparent Stiffness is a Consistent Predictor of Uniaxial Apparent Strength in Human Vertebral Cancellous Bone Tested with Different Boundary Conditions, J. Biomech., 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00155-510.1016/S0021-9290(01)00155-5 ↗
35. J. Aubin, D.F. Fletcher, and C. Xuereb, Design of Micromixers Using CFD Modelling, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.04310.1016/j.ces.2004.11.043 ↗
36. R. B. Ashman, J. D. Corint, and C. H. Turnerj, “Elastic Properties of Cancellous Bone:,” vol. M, no. 10, 1987.
37. J. Kabel, A. Odgaard, B. Van Rietbergen, and R. Huiskes, Connectivity and the Elastic Properties of Cancellous Bone, Bone, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00164-110.1016/S8756-3282(98)00164-1 ↗
38. A. Karki and J. Wu, Measurement of Ultrasound Parameters of Bovine Cancellous Bone as a Function of Frequency for a Range of Porosities via Through-Transmission Ultrasonic Spectroscopy, Acoustics, 2022, 4(2), p 406-418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ACOUSTICS402002510.3390/ACOUSTICS4020025 ↗
39. J.W.A. Fletcher, S. Williams, M.R. Whitehouse, H.S. Gill, and E. Preatoni, Juvenile Bovine Bone is an Appropriate Surrogate for Normal and Reduced Density Human Bone in Biomechanical Testing: A Validation Study, Sci. Rep., 2018 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28155-w10.1038/s41598-018-28155-w ↗
40. M. Bittner-Frank, A.G. Reisinger, O.G. Andriotis, D.H. Pahr, and P.J. Thurner, Cortical and Trabecular Mechanical Properties in the Femoral Neck Vary Differently with Changes in Bone Mineral Density, JBMR Plus, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae04910.1093/jbmrpl/ziae049 ↗
41. D.H. Pahr and A.G. Reisinger, A Review on Recent Advances in the Constitutive Modeling of Bone Tissue, Curr. Osteoporos. Rep., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-020-00631-110.1007/s11914-020-00631-1 ↗
42. S.A. Goldstein, D.L. Wilson, D.A. Sonstegard, and L.S. Matthews, The Mechanical Properties of Human Tibial Trabecular Bone as a Function of Metaphyseal Location, J. Biomech., 1983, 16(12), p 965-969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(83)90097-010.1016/0021-9290(83)90097-0 ↗
43. B.V. Parakhonskiy, J. Song, and A.G. Skirtach, Machine Learning in Nanoarchitectonics, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2025.10354610.1016/j.cis.2025.103546 ↗
44. S.S. Bagewadi, R.K. Bhagchandani, S. Manivannan, M.K. Sinha, and U. Chandrasekhar, A Study on the Out-of-Plane Behavior of Auxetic and Hybrid Auxetic Structures, Prog. Addit. Manuf., 2025, 10(9), p 6935-6946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-025-01018-310.1007/s40964-025-01018-3 ↗
45. V.K.R. Sirigiri, V.Y. Gudiga, U.S. Gattu, G. Suneesh, and K.M. Buddaraju, A Review on Johnson Cook Material Model, Mater. Today Proc., 2022, 62, p 3450-3456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.27910.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.279 ↗
46. S. Bieler and K. Weinberg, “Energy Absorption of Sustainable Lattice Structures Under Impact Loading,” Dec. 2024, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06547
47. A. Jones, M. Leary, S. Bateman, and M. Easton, Parametric Design and Evaluation of TPMS-like Cellular Solids, Mater. Des., 2022, 221, 110908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11090810.1016/j.matdes.2022.110908 ↗
48. I. Maskery et al., Insights into the Mechanical Properties of Several Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Lattice Structures made by Polymer Additive Manufacturing, Polymer, 2018, 152, p 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.04910.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.049 ↗
49. H. Karcher and K. Polthier, Construction of Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 1996, 354(1715), p 2077-2104. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1996.009310.1098/rsta.1996.0093 ↗
50. J.J. Shea, Polymeric Foams: Mechanisms and Materials, IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag., 2005 https://doi.org/10.1109/mei.2005.141223210.1109/mei.2005.1412232 ↗
51. M. Spoerk, J. Gonzalez-Gutierrez, J. Sapkota, S. Schuschnigg, and C. Holzer, Effect of the Printing Bed Temperature on the Adhesion of Parts Produced by Fused Filament Fabrication, Plast. Rubber Compos., 2018, 47(1), p 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14658011.2017.139953110.1080/14658011.2017.1399531 ↗
52. M.F.R. Misran, M.S. Othman, and Z.A.H. Khamisan, Study on Mechanical Properties of Pla Printed using 3D Printer, J. Adv. Res. Appl. Mech., 2019, 59(1), p 10-18.
53. K.N. Gunasekaran, V. Aravinth, C.B.M. Kumaran, K. Madhankumar, S.P. Kumar, and Elsevier Ltd, Investigation of Mechanical Properties of PLA Printed Materials Under Varying Infill Density, Mater. Today Proc., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.04110.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.041 ↗
54. M. Domingo-Espin, J.M. Puigoriol-Forcada, A.A. Garcia-Granada, J. Llumà, S. Borros, and G. Reyes, Mechanical Property Characterization and Simulation of Fused Deposition Modeling Polycarbonate Parts, Mater. Des., 2015, 83, p 670-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.07410.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.074 ↗
55. A. Bellini and S. Güçeri, Mechanical Characterization of Parts Fabricated Using Fused Deposition Modeling, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2003, 9(4), p 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254031048963110.1108/13552540310489631 ↗
56. A.I. Ansari and N.A. Sheikh, Simulation and Experimental Assesment of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Polymer Based New Lattice Design, J. Inst. Eng. (India) Series C, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-023-00928-x10.1007/s40032-023-00928-x ↗
57. A.A. Ansari and M. Kamil, Effect of Print Speed and Extrusion Temperature on Properties of 3D Printed PLA Using Fused Deposition Modeling Process, Mater. Today Proc., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.13710.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.137 ↗
58. W. Lee, D.Y. Kang, J. Song, J.H. Moon, and D. Kim, Controlled Unusual Stiffness of Mechanical Metamaterials, Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, p 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2031210.1038/srep20312 ↗
59. S. Ataollahi, A Review on Additive Manufacturing of Lattice Structures in Tissue Engineering, Bioprinting, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e0030410.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00304 ↗
60. A.I. Ansari and N.A. Sheikh, A Review on Materials Application in Scaffold Design by Fused Deposition Method, J. Inst. Eng. (India) Series C, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-023-00988-z10.1007/s40032-023-00988-z ↗
61. A.I. Ansari and N.A. Sheikh, Simulation and Experimental Assesment of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Polymer Based New Lattice Design, J. Inst. Eng. (India) Series C, 2023, 104(3), p 593-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-023-00928-x10.1007/s40032-023-00928-x ↗
62. H. Gao, Application of Fracture Mechanics Concepts to HIERARCHICAL BIOMECHANICS of Bone and Bone-Like Materials, Int. J. Fract., 2006 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-006-7156-410.1007/s10704-006-7156-4 ↗
63. C. J. Hernandez and T. M. Keaveny, “A Biomechanical Perspective on Bone Quality.”
64. J.-Y. Rho, L. Kuhn-Spearing, and P. Zioupos, Mechanical Properties and the Hierarchical Structure of Bone, Med. Eng. Phys., 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00007-110.1016/S1350-4533(98)00007-1 ↗
65. C. Wang et al., Dynamic Behaviour of Bio-Inspired Heterocyclic Aramid Fibre-Reinforced Laminates Subjected to Low-Velocity Drop-Weight Impact, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10673310.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106733 ↗
66. V.T. Le, A. Ghazlan, T. Nguyen, and T. Ngo, Performance of Bio-Inspired Cross-Laminated Timber Under Blast Loading - A Numerical Study, Compos. Struct., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11352410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113524 ↗
67. F. Ghorbani, H. Gharehbaghi, A. Farrokhabadi, A. Bolouri, A.H. Behravesh, and S.K. Hedayati, Investigation of Energy Absorption Performances of a 3D Printed Fiber-Reinforced Bio-Inspired Cellular Structure Under in-Plane Compression Loading, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., 2024, 31(21), p 5234-5252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2023.221455210.1080/15376494.2023.2214552 ↗
68. A.I. Ansari and N.A. Sheikh, A Review on Different Approaches for Foam Fabrication, J. Inst. Eng. (India) Series C, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-023-00998-x10.1007/s40032-023-00998-x ↗