Investigation of AA2014-nAl2O3 Nanocomposites Manufactured by SUS Technique: Parameter Optimization and Corrosion Resistance Enhancement
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The fabrication of aluminum metal matrix composites (AMMCs) plays a pivotal role in determining their suitability for marine applications, where materials are subjected to harsh environments, including saltwater exposure, high humidity, and fluctuating mechanical loads. Poor particle dispersion, agglomeration, and inadequate bonding between the matrix and reinforcements often result in localized corrosion, reduced wear resistance, and structural degradation, making conventional AMMCs less reliable in marine settings. The presence of defects such as porosity and uneven reinforcement distribution further compromises their mechanical integrity and long-term durability under corrosive marine conditions. To overcome these challenges, this study employed an innovative stir-ultrasonication-squeeze (SUS) casting technique to enhance the microstructural and corrosion properties of AA2014-nAl 2 O 3 nanocomposites. Critical process parameters, including ultrasonic power (2250 W), ultrasonication time (16 minutes), pouring temperature (700 °C), squeeze pressure (150 MPa), and reinforcement content (2 wt.%), were systematically optimized to achieve uniform particle dispersion, grain refinement, and enhanced corrosion resistance. Advanced characterization using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM) and optical microscopy (OM) revealed the mitigation of particle clustering and a refined grain structure with a minimum size of 43 µm under optimized conditions. Taguchi grey relational analysis (TGRSA) identified the influence of process parameters on corrosion performance, with ANOVA showing ultrasonication time as the most significant factor (11.5% contribution). Confirmation tests demonstrated optimal process conditions—2.248 kW ultrasonic power, 15.89 minutes ultrasonication time, 700.1 °C pouring temperature, 143 MPa squeeze pressure, and 1.95 wt.% reinforcement—leading to significant improvements in corrosion resistance, including a 14% reduction in salt spray corrosion rate and a 37% increase in grey relational grade (GRG). These findings underscore the potential of the SUS casting technique to address the traditional limitations of AMMCs, providing a pathway for developing corrosion-resistant materials tailored for marine and other extreme environmental applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Suthar and K. Patel, Identification, Screening and Optimization of Significant Parameters for Stir Cast Hybrid Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite, Heliyon, 2018, 4(12), e00988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e0098810.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00988 ↗
2. L.-J. Zhang, F. Qiu, J.-G. Wang, H.-Y. Wang, and Q.-C. Jiang, Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of the AlW2014 Composites Reinforced with Bimodal Sized SiC Particles, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2015, 637, p 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.01210.1016/j.msea.2015.04.012 ↗
3. Q. Ge, M. Vedani, and G. Vimercati, Extrusion of Magnesium Tubes for Biodegradable Stent Precursors, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2012, 27(2), p 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2011.56023110.1080/10426914.2011.560231 ↗
4. J. Suthar and K.M. Patel, Processing Issues, Machining, and Applications of Aluminum Metal Matrix Composites, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2018, 33(5), p 499–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.140171310.1080/10426914.2017.1401713 ↗
5. S. Swain, R. Kumar, I. Panigrahi, A.K. Sahoo, and A. Panda, Machinability Performance Investigation in CNC Turning of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy: Dry versus Iron-Aluminium Oil Coupled MQL Machining Comparison, Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf., 2022, 5(4), p 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.06.00210.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.06.002 ↗
6. M.M. Lachowicz, Metallurgical Aspects of the Corrosion Resistance of 7000 Series Aluminum Alloys - a Review, Mater. Sci. Poland, 2023, 41(3), p 159–180. https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2023-004110.2478/msp-2023-0041 ↗
7. V.K. Parikh, A.D. Badgujar, and N.D. Ghetiya, Investigation of Microstructural and Wear Properties of Stir Cast and Friction Stir Processed AA 2014-Based Metal Matrix Composites, Adv. Mater. Process. Technol., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2022.213668810.1080/2374068X.2022.2136688 ↗
8. H.M. Liu, C. Sun, J.A. Liu, and Y. Lu, Characterization and Compressive Property of Mg Alloy-Ceramic Sphere Composites, Mater. Res. Express, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aad8ff10.1088/2053-1591/aad8ff ↗
9. S.M. Dezfuli and M. Sabzi, Effect of Yttria and Benzotriazole Doping on Wear/Corrosion Responses of Alumina-Based Nanostructured Films, Ceram. Int., 2018, 44(16), p 20245–20258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.31310.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.313 ↗
10. M. Ravikumar, H.N. Reddappa, R. Suresh, M.S. Reddy, E.R. Babu, N.C. Reddy, C.R. Ravikumar, and H.C.A. Murthy, Evaluation of Corrosion Properties of Al2O3 and SiC Reinforced Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites Using Taguchi’s Techniques, J. Sci. Res., 2021, 65(01), p 253–259.
11. M. Bragaglia, R. Montanari, and G. Montesperelli, Effect of Al2O3 Reinforcement and Precipitates on Corrosion Behaviour of 2618 and 6061 Aluminium MMCs, Corros. Eng., Sci. Technol., 2019, 54(7), p 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478422X.2019.164580210.1080/1478422X.2019.1645802 ↗
12. B. Thakur, S. Barve, and P. Pesode, Investigation on Mechanical Properties of AZ31B Magnesium Alloy Manufactured by Stir Casting Process, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2023, 138, 105641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10564110.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105641 ↗
13. C. Veera Ajay and K. Manisekar, Metallurgical, Mechanical and Tribological Properties of AZ31-Sn/Nano-Al2O3 Composites Fabricated by Stir Casting Technique, Trans. Indian Instit Metals, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-02879-410.1007/s12666-023-02879-4 ↗
14. S.K. Soni, D. Ganatra, P. Mendiratta, C.S.K.A. Reddy, and B. Thomas, Microstructure and Mechanical Characterization of Al2O3/Graphene Reinforced Al6061 Based Hybrid Nanocomposites, Met. Mater. Int., 2022, 28(2), p 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-021-01103-610.1007/s12540-021-01103-6 ↗
15. S.B. Bin, S.M. Xing, L.M. Tian, N. Zhao, and L. Li, Influence of Technical Parameters on Strength and Ductility of AlSi9Cu3 Alloys in Squeeze Casting, Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soci. China (English E), 2013, 23(4), p 977–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62555-810.1016/S1003-6326(13)62555-8 ↗
16. D. Sameer Kumar, K.N.S. Suman, C. Tara Sasanka, K. Ravindra, P. Poddar, and S.B. Venkata Siva, Microstructure, Mechanical Response and Fractography of AZ91E/Al2O3 (p) Nano Composite Fabricated by Semi Solid Stir Casting Method, J. Magnes. Alloys, 2017, 5(1), p 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2016.11.00610.1016/j.jma.2016.11.006 ↗
17. S.B. Prabu, L. Karunamoorthy, S. Kathiresan, and B. Mohan, Influence of Stirring Speed and Stirring Time on Distribution of Particles in Cast Metal Matrix Composite, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2006, 171(2), p 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.07110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.071 ↗
18. J. Maj, M. Basista, W. Węglewski, K. Bochenek, A. Strojny-Nędza, K. Naplocha, T. Panzner, M. Tatarková, and F. Fiori, Effect of Microstructure on Mechanical Properties and Residual Stresses in Interpenetrating Aluminum-Alumina Composites Fabricated by Squeeze Casting, Mater. Sc. Eng. A, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.09110.1016/j.msea.2017.12.091 ↗
19. A. Manivannan and R. Sasikumar, Exemplary Encapsulate Feeding in Stir Casting for Quality Composites, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2019, 34(6), p 689–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2019.156696210.1080/10426914.2019.1566962 ↗
20. A.H. Idrisi and A.-H.I. Mourad, Conventional Stir Casting versus Ultrasonic Assisted Stir Casting Process: Mechanical and Physical Characteristics of AMCs, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 805, p 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.07610.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.076 ↗
21. A. Gnanavelbabu, E. Vinothkumar, N.S. Ross, M.K. Gupta, and M. Jamil, Tribo-Corrosive Wear and Mechanical Properties of Nanoparticles Reinforced Mg-AZ91D Composites, Tribol. Int., 2023, 178, 108054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2022.10805410.1016/j.triboint.2022.108054 ↗
22. A. Gnanavelbabu, M. Prahadeeswaran, R. Rai, N.S. Ross, and M.K. Gupta, Tribo-Corrosive Wear Behaviour of Squeeze-Casted MG/TIN/HBN Composite under Different Ageing Temperature, Tribol. Int., 2023, 187(June), 108748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2023.10874810.1016/j.triboint.2023.108748 ↗
23. D. Gao, Z. Li, Q. Han, and Q. Zhai, Effect of Ultrasonic Power on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AZ91 Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2009, 502(1–2), p 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.00510.1016/j.msea.2008.12.005 ↗
24. A. Gnanavelbabu, E. Vinothkumar, N.S. Ross, R. Rai, and M. Kuntoğlu, Investigating the Influence of NaCl Concentration on the Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Metal Oxide Reinforced Magnesium Matrix Composites, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2023, 23(2), p 113.10.1007/s43452-023-00658-y ↗
25. G. Chen, M. Yang, Y. Jin, H. Zhang, F. Han, Q. Chen, and Z. Zhao, Ultrasonic Assisted Squeeze Casting of a Wrought Aluminum Alloy, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 266, p 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.03210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.032 ↗
26. S. Khatai, R. Kumar, A. Panda, and A.K. Sahoo, WASPAS Based Multi Response Optimization in Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel under ZnO Nanofluid Assisted Dual Nozzle Pulse-MQL Environment, Appl. Sci. (Switze.), 2023 https://doi.org/10.3390/app13181006210.3390/app131810062 ↗
27. A. Panda, A.K. Sahoo, I. Panigrahi, and A.K. Rout, Investigating Machinability in Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Bearing Steel through Performance Measurement: QR, ANN and GRA Study, Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng., 2018, 15(1), p 4935–4961.10.15282/ijame.15.1.2018.5.0384 ↗
28. T. Sathish, V. Mohanavel, T. Arunkumar, T. Raja, A. Rashedi, I.M. Alarifi, I.A. Badruddin, A. Algahtani, and A. Afzal, Investigation of Mechanical Properties and Salt Spray Corrosion Test Parameters Optimization for Aa8079 with Reinforcement of Tin Zro2, Materials, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1418526010.3390/ma14185260 ↗
29. A. Gacem, M.S. Refat, H.E. Ali, S.C.V.R.M. Naidu, B. Beenarani, P. Deole, S.S. Kumar, S. Rama, A.M. Alsuhaibani, and A. Diriba, Optimization and Mechanical Characteristics of AA6061/Zirconia Nanocomposites Fabricated by Ultrasonic-Aided Stir Casting Method, J. Nanomater., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/245341210.1155/2022/2453412 ↗
30. G. Dirisenapu, L. Dumpala, and S.P. Reddy, Dry Sliding Tribological Behavior of Al7010/B4C/BN Hybrid Metal Matrix Nanocomposites Prepared by Ultrasonic-Assisted Stir Casting, Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2021, 74(1), p 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02128-y10.1007/s12666-020-02128-y ↗
31. T.K. Ibrahim, D.S. Yawas, B. Dan-asabe, and A.A. Adebisi, Manufacturing and Optimization of the Effect of Casting Process Parameters on the Compressive Strength of Aluminum/Pumice/Carbonated Coal Hybrid Composites: Taguchi and Regression Analysis Approach, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2023, 125(7–8), p 3401–3414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10923-210.1007/s00170-023-10923-2 ↗
32. A. Jahangiri, S.P.H. Marashi, M. Mohammadaliha, and V. Ashofte, The Effect of Pressure and Pouring Temperature on the Porosity, Microstructure, Hardness and Yield Stress of AA2024 Aluminum Alloy during the Squeeze Casting Process, J. Mater. Process.Technol., 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.02.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.02.005 ↗
33. M.H. Sarfraz, M. Jahanzaib, W. Ahmed, and S. Hussain, Multi-Response Parametric Optimization of Squeeze Casting Process for Fabricating Al 6061-SiC Composite, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 102(1–4), p 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-03278-610.1007/s00170-018-03278-6 ↗
34. L. Kamaraj, P. Hariharasakthisudhan, and A.A.M. Moshi, Optimizing the Ultrasonication Effect in Stir-Casting Process of Aluminum Hybrid Composite Using Desirability Function Approach and Artificial Neural Network, Proc. Insti. Engi.: J. Mater. Des Appl, 2021, 235(9), p 2007–2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420721102570610.1177/14644207211025706 ↗
35. G.C.M. Patel, P. Krishna, P.R. Vundavilli, and M.B. Parappagoudar, Multi-Objective Optimization of Squeeze Casting Process Using Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization, Arch. Foundry Eng., 2016, 16(3), p 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1515/afe-2016-007310.1515/afe-2016-0073 ↗
36. D. Zhou, X. Su, C. Yang, Z. Kang, and Z. Li, A Systematic Approach to Model and Optimize Qualities of Castings Produced by Squeeze Casting Process, Int. J. Metalcast., 2022, 32, p 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.02.00410.1016/j.jmapro.2018.02.004 ↗
37. A.H. Idrisi and A.-H.I. Mourad, Conventional Stir Casting versus Ultrasonic Assisted Stir Casting Process: Mechanical and Physical Characteristics of AMCs, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 805, p 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.07610.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.076 ↗
38. J.G. Jung, J.M. Lee, Y.H. Cho, and W.H. Yoon, Combined Effects of Ultrasonic Melt Treatment, Si Addition and Solution Treatment on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Multicomponent Al[Sbnd]Si Alloys, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 693, p 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.00610.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.006 ↗
39. X.J. Wang, N.Z. Wang, L.Y. Wang, X.S. Hu, K. Wu, Y.Q. Wang, and Y.D. Huang, Processing, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Micro-SiC Particles Reinforced Magnesium Matrix Composites Fabricated by Stir Casting Assisted by Ultrasonic Treatment Processing, Mater. Des., 2014, 57, p 638–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.02210.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.022 ↗
40. R.R. Babu, C. Rajendran, A. Saiyathibrahim, and V. Rajkumar, Influence of B4C and ZrB2 Reinforcements on Microstructural, Mechanical and Wear Behaviour of AA 2014 Aluminium Matrix Hybrid Composites, Def. Technol., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2024.05.00910.1016/j.dt.2024.05.009 ↗
41. Z. Xu, L. Ma, J. Yan, W. Chen, and S. Yang, Solidification Microstructure of SiC Particulate Reinforced ZneAl Composites under Ultrasonic Exposure, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2014, 148(3), p 824–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.08.05710.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.08.057 ↗
42. N. Srivastava, G.P. Chaudhari, and M. Qian, Grain Refinement of Binary Al-Si, Al-Cu and Al-Ni Alloys by Ultrasonication, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.06.02410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.06.024 ↗
43. A. Gnanavelbabu, K.T.S. Surendran, and S. Kumar, Process Optimization and Studies on Mechanical Characteristics of AA2014/Al2O3 Nanocomposites Fabricated Through Ultrasonication Assisted Stir-Squeeze Casting, Int. J. Metalcast., 2022, 16(2), p 759–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00634-310.1007/s40962-021-00634-3 ↗
44. P. Vijian and V.P. Arunachalam, Optimization of Squeeze Casting Process Parameters Using Taguchi Analysis, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2007, 33(11–12), p 1122–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0550-210.1007/s00170-006-0550-2 ↗
45. D. Zhou, X. Su, C. Yang, Z. Kang, and Z. Li, A Systematic Approach to Model and Optimize Qualities of Castings Produced by Squeeze Casting Process, Int. J. Metalcast., 2022, 32, p 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-022-00887-610.1007/s40962-022-00887-6 ↗
46. A. Khandelwal, K. Mani, N. Srivastava, R. Gupta, and G.P. Chaudhari, Mechanical Behavior of AZ31/Al2O3 Magnesium Alloy Nanocomposites Prepared Using Ultrasound Assisted Stir Casting, Compos. B Eng., 2017, 123, p 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.007 ↗
47. A. Gnanavelbabu, X.J. Amul, and K.T.S. Surendran, Investigation on the Tribocorrosion and Electrochemical Corrosion Behaviour of AA2014/Al2O3 Nanocomposites Fabricated through Ultrasonication Coupled Stir-Squeeze Casting Method, J. Appl. Electrochem., 2022, 52(4), p 765–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-022-01666-110.1007/s10800-022-01666-1 ↗
48. H.Y. Xu, X.Q. Yuan, L.Y. Dai, W.S. Wang, Y. Li, and L.M. Dong, Fenton-like Degradation of Rhodamine B over Fe2O3–Al2O3-Zeolite Hybrids Derived from Coal Fly Ash, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-04884-y10.1007/s13762-023-04884-y ↗
49. R. Adalarasan, M. Santhanakumar, and M. Rajmohan, Optimization of Laser Cutting Parameters for Al6061/SiCp/Al2O3 Composite Using Grey Based Response Surface Methodology (GRSM), Measurement, 2015, 73, p 596–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.00310.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.003 ↗
50. B.K. Pandey, A.K. Shahi, and R. Gopal, Optical and Electrical Transport Properties of MnO Nanoparticles, Mater. Focus, 2013, 2(3), p 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1166/mat.2013.107810.1166/mat.2013.1078 ↗