Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of 3D Printed Sandwich Composite with Polylactic Acid–Micro-crystalline Cellulose Bio-inspired Xylotus Lattice Core: Energy Absorption and Crashworthiness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. D. Tsamos et al., Impact-Dissipating Capacity of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Samples, Fabricated by Fused Filament Fabrication, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08382-710.1007/s11665-023-08382-7 ↗
2. Z. Wen, M. Li, L. He and M. Xue, Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Core Structures on Low-Velocity Impact Response of PEEK Sandwich Panels Manufactured by FDM, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-09433-310.1007/s11665-024-09433-3 ↗
3. V. Acanfora, M. Zarrelli and A. Riccio, Experimental and Numerical Assessment of the Impact Behaviour of a Composite Sandwich Panel with a Polymeric Honeycomb Core, Int. J. Impact Eng, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.10439210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104392 ↗
4. M.N.V.R.L. Kumar and R. Ramakrishnan, Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis of 3D Printed Polycarbonate/Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Composite Loaded with Tetrabromobiphenol-A and Microcrystalline Cellulose, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-07051-510.1007/s11665-022-07051-5 ↗
5. X. Zhou, C. Qu, Y. Luo, R. Heise and G. Bao, Compression Behavior and Impact Energy Absorption Characteristics of 3D Printed Polymer Lattices and Their Hybrid Sandwich Structures, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06242-w10.1007/s11665-021-06242-w ↗
6. S. Askarinejad, S. Wang, F. Shalchy, J. Rosewitz, H.A. Choshali and N. Rahbar, Deformation and Toughening Mechanisms in Nacreous Structures, Comprehensive Structural Integrity, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822944-6.00067-010.1016/B978-0-12-822944-6.00067-0 ↗
7. N. Ranjan, R. Singh and I.P.S. Ahuja, Investigations on Joining of Orthopaedic Scaffold with Rapid Tooling, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med., 2019 https://doi.org/10.1177/095441191985281110.1177/0954411919852811 ↗
8. A. Riccio et al., A Global-Local Numerical Model for the Prediction of Impact Induced Damage in Composite Laminates, Appl. Compos. Mater., 2014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-013-9343-610.1007/s10443-013-9343-6 ↗
9. N. Ranjan, M. Singh, D. Singh and R. Kumar, Hydrogels for Additive Manufacturing in Scaffolding Applications: A Review, Innov. Process. Mater. Addit. Manuf., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-86011-6.00009-X10.1016/B978-0-323-86011-6.00009-X ↗
10. E. Russel et al., Effect of Hygrothermal Aging on Novel Hybrid Composites: Transforming Textile Waste into a Valuable Product, Polym. Compos., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2800610.1002/pc.28006 ↗
11. A. Russo, M. Zarrelli, A. Sellitto and A. Riccio, Fiber Bridging Induced Toughening Effects on the Delamination Behavior of Composite Stiffened Panels Under Bending Loading: A Numerical/Experimental Study, Materials (Basel), 2019 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1215240710.3390/ma12152407 ↗
12. U.K. Komal, B.K. Kasaudhan and I. Singh, Comparative Performance Analysis of Polylactic Acid Parts Fabricated by 3D Printing and Injection Molding, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(9), p 6522–6528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05889-910.1007/s11665-021-05889-9 ↗
13. D. Rosen and S. Kim, Design and Manufacturing Implications of Additive Manufacturing, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06030-610.1007/s11665-021-06030-6 ↗
14. N. Khan, V. Acanfora and A. Riccio, Non-Conventional Wing Structure Design with Lattice Infilled through Design for Additive Manufacturing, Materials, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1707147010.3390/ma17071470 ↗
15. M.M. Tünçay, An Investigation of 3D Printing Parameters on Tensile Strength of PLA Using Response Surface Method, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08395-210.1007/s11665-023-08395-2 ↗
16. M. Kumar and R. Ramakrishnan, Effect of Fused Filament Fabrication Parameters and Tetrabromobisphenol-A/Microcrystalline Cellulose Additives on the Dynamic Mechanical Behavior of Polycarbonate/Acrylonitrile–Butadiene–Styrene Blends for Precision Structures, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-07143-210.1007/s11665-022-07143-2 ↗
17. V. Acanfora, A. Sellitto, A. Russo, M. Zarrelli and A. Riccio, Experimental Investigation on 3D Printed Lightweight Sandwich Structures for Energy Absorption Aerospace Applications, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.10827610.1016/j.ast.2023.108276 ↗
18. J. Rajaparthiban, G. Suresh, R. Ganesamoorthy, K.R. Padmavathi, S.H.M. Abbas and C.M. Meenakshi, Effect of Polyurethane Ratio on Mechanical Behavior of Banana Fiber/Polyurethane-Vinylester Matrix Composites, Rev. Mater., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-707620220002.138210.1590/S1517-707620220002.1382 ↗
19. A. Fadeel, H. Abdulhadi, R. Srinivasan and A. Mian, A Computational Approach in Understanding the Low-Velocity Impact Behavior and Damage of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattice Structures, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05873-310.1007/s11665-021-05873-3 ↗
20. N. Ranjan, R. Singh, I.P.S. Ahuja and J. Singh, Fabrication of PLA-HAP-CS Based Biocompatible and Biodegradable Feedstock Filament Using Twin Screw Extrusion, Addit. Manuf. Emerg. Mater., 2018 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91713-9_1110.1007/978-3-319-91713-9_11 ↗
21. G. Sun, D. Chen, H. Wang, P.J. Hazell and Q. Li, High-Velocity Impact Behaviour of Aluminium Honeycomb Sandwich Panels With Different Structural Configurations, Int. J. Impact Eng, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.007 ↗
22. G. Li and V.S. Chakka, Isogrid Stiffened Syntactic Foam Cored Sandwich Structure Under Low Velocity Impact, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.007 ↗
23. S.P. Soe, P. Martin, M. Jones, M. Robinson and P. Theobald, Feasibility of Optimising Bicycle Helmet Design Safety Through the Use of Additive Manufactured TPE Cellular Structures, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6972-y10.1007/s00170-015-6972-y ↗
24. Y.T. Kao, A.R. Amin, N. Payne, J. Wang and B.L. Tai, Low-Velocity Impact Response of 3d-Printed Lattice Structure with Foam Reinforcement, Compos. Struct., 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.04210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.042 ↗
25. C.C. Kuo, J.Y. Chen and Y.H. Chang, Optimization of Process Parameters for Fabricating Polylactic Acid Filaments Using Design of Experiments Approach, Polymers (Basel), 2021 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1308122210.3390/polym13081222 ↗
26. M. Shafie and H. Zarea-Hosseinabadi, Eco-Friendly Laminated Strand Lumber from Date Palm Rachis: Analysis of Mechanical Properties by Taguchi Design of Experiment, Drv. Ind., 2019 https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2019.184310.5552/drvind.2019.1843 ↗
27. L.M. Ferreira, M.T. Aranda, M. Muñoz-Reja, C.A.C.P. Coelho and L. Távara, Ageing Effect on the Low-Velocity Impact Response of 3D Printed Continuous Fibre Reinforced Composites, Compos. Part B Eng., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11103110.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111031 ↗
28. X. Ji, L. Deng, J. Zhang, Y. Luan and Y. Duan, Energy Absorption Characteristics of 3D Lattice Structure Filled with Periodic Inner Core Based on 3D Printing, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-06692-w10.1007/s11665-022-06692-w ↗
29. E. Soleyman et al., Assessment of Controllable Shape Transformation, Potential Applications, and Tensile Shape Memory Properties of 3D Printed PETG, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.07610.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.076 ↗
30. M. Rinaldi, F. Cecchini, L. Pigliaru, T. Ghidini, F. Lumaca and F. Nanni, Additive Manufacturing of Polyether Ether Ketone (Peek) for Space Applications: A Nanosat Polymeric Structure, Polymers (Basel), 2021 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1301001110.3390/polym13010011 ↗
31. P. Latko-Durałek, K. Dydek and A. Boczkowska, Thermal, Rheological and Mechanical Properties of PETG/rPETG Blends, J. Polym. Environ., 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-019-01544-610.1007/s10924-019-01544-6 ↗
32. N. Ranjan, R. Singh and I.P.S. Ahuja, Investigations for Mechanical Properties of PLA-HAp-CS Based Functional Prototypes, Mater. Today Proc., 2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.01610.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.016 ↗
33. N. Ranjan, R. Singh, I.P.S. Ahuja, M. Rahman and S. Ramakrishna, PLA-HAp-CS-Based Biocompatible Scaffolds Prepared Through Micro-Additive Manufacturing: A Review and Future Applications, Mater. Horizons From Nat. Nanomater., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5424-7_1010.1007/978-981-15-5424-7_10 ↗
34. N. Ranjan et al., On 3D Printed Scaffolds for Orthopedic Tissue Engineering Applications, SN Appl. Sci., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-1936-810.1007/s42452-020-1936-8 ↗
35. N. Ranjan et al., 3D Printed Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: Mechanical, Morphological, Thermal, In-vitro and In-vivo Investigations, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.01.00210.1016/j.cirpj.2021.01.002 ↗
36. ASTM D7136 / D7136M-15, ‘Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop-Weight’, Impact Event, ASTM Int. (2015)
37. B.L. Sunith, K.V. Pradeep Kumar and K.G. JayaChristiyan, Studies on Factors Influencing Low Velocity Impact of Composite Materials—A Review, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, 1126(1), p 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1126/1/01207910.1088/1757-899X/1126/1/012079 ↗
38. P. Fosodeder, M. Pfleger, S. van Frank and C. Rankl, THz Computed Tomography for Non-destructive Testing, Res. Rev. J. Nondestruct. Test., 2023 https://doi.org/10.58286/2822510.58286/28225 ↗
39. M. Chen et al., Characterization of Bamboo Extrinsic Toughening Mechanism in Bending by X-ray Micro-computed Tomography(micro-CT), Ind. Crops Prod., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11788210.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117882 ↗
40. M. Ghaedsharaf, J.E. Brunel and L.L. Lebel, Fiber-Level Numerical Simulation of Biaxial Braids for Mesoscopic Morphology Prediction Validated by X-ray Computed Tomography Scan, Compos. Part B Eng., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10893810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108938 ↗
41. D. Terzis and L. Laloui, Quantitative analysis of the crystalline bond lattice of bio-improved soils using micro-computed tomography, in ICSMGE 2017 - 19th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (2017)
42. F. Nur Ainin, M.D. Azaman, M.S. Abdul Majid and M.J.M. Ridzuan, Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Sandwich Composite Structure with 3D Printed Hexagonal Honeycomb Core: Varying Core Materials, Funct. Compos. Struct., 2022, 4(3), p 035007. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-6331/ac8d7a10.1088/2631-6331/ac8d7a ↗
43. A.M. Al-Areqi, B. Aloyaydi, S. Subbarayan and F.A. Al-Mufadi, Low-Velocity Impact Performance of 3D-Printed PLA/Epoxy/Glass Fibers of Composite structures and Latches, Mater. Today Commun., 2024, 39, p 109264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.10926410.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109264 ↗
44. P. Rupp, J. Imhoff and K.A. Weidenmann, Low-Velocity Impact Properties of Sandwich Structures With Aluminum Foam Cores and CFRP Face Sheets, J. Compos. Sci., 2018 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs202002410.3390/jcs2020024 ↗