Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters for Enhanced Mechanical Properties of PEEK: An Experimental Investigation Using a Genetic Algorithm-Integrated Grey-ANFIS Hybrid Statistical Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Butt, D.A. Onimowo, M. Gohrabian, T. Sharma, and H. Shirvani, A Desktop 3D Printer with Dual Extruders to Produce Customised Electronic Circuitry, Front. Mech. Eng., 2018, 13(4), p 528–534.10.1007/s11465-018-0502-1 ↗
2. K. Raney, E. Lani, and D.K. Kalla, Experimental Characterization of the Tensile Strength of ABS Parts Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling Process, Mater. Today Proc., 2017, 4(8), p 7956–7961.10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.132 ↗
3. X. Qu, X. Li, L. Zhang, D. Yi, J. Wang, C. Wen, Z. Zhao, X. Gu, Y. Lin, B. Liu, Y. Cao, and P. Bai, Effect of Construction Angles on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of LPBF-Fabricated 15–5 PH Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2024, 900, p 146423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2024.14642310.1016/j.msea.2024.146423 ↗
4. C.P. Jiang, Y.C. Cheng, H.W. Lin, Y.L. Chang, T. Pasang, and S.Y. Lee, Optimization of FDM 3D Printing Parameters for High Strength PEEK Using the Taguchi Method and Experimental Validation, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2022, 28(7), p 1260–1271. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-07-2021-016610.1108/rpj-07-2021-0166 ↗
5. P. Guo, B. Zou, C. Huang et al., Study on Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Machinability of Efficiently Additive Manufactured AISI 316L Stainless Steel by High-Power Direct Laser Deposition, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2017, 240, p 12–22.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.005 ↗
6. H. Xing, B. Zou, X. Liu et al., Effect of Particle Size Distribution on the Preparation of ZTA Ceramic Paste Applying for Stereolithog-Raphy 3D Printing, Powder Technol., 2020, 359, p 314–322.10.1016/j.powtec.2019.09.066 ↗
7. H. Xing, B. Zou, X. Wang et al., Fabrication and Characterization of SiC Whiskers Toughened Al2O3 Paste for Stereolithography 3D Printing Applications, J. Alloy. Compd., 2020, 828, p 154347.10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154347 ↗
8. X. Liu, B. Zou, H. Xing et al., The Preparation of ZrO2-Al2O3 Composite Ceramic by SLA-3D Printing and Sintering Processing, Ceram. Int., 2020, 46, p 937–944.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.054 ↗
9. S. Magar, N.K. Khedkar, and S. Kumar, Review of the Effect of Built Orientation on Mechanical Properties of Metal-Plastic Composite Parts Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing Technique, Mater. Today Proc., 2018, 5(2), p 3926–3935.10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.649 ↗
10. J. Weinmann, H. Ip, D. Prigozhin, E. Escobar, M. Mendelson, and R. Noorani, Applicaton of design of experiments (Doe) on the processing of rapid prototyped samples. Solid free symposium proceedings (Austin, Texas). 2003, pp. 340–347
11. B.M. Tymrak, M. Kreiger, and J.M. Pearce, Mechanical Properties of Com-ponents Fabricated with Open-Source 3-D Printers under Realistic Environ-mental Conditions, Mater. Des., 2014, 58, p 242–246.10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 ↗
12. R. Srinivasan, W. Ruban, A. Deepanraj, R. Bhuvanesh, and T. Bhuvanesh, Effect on Infill Density on Mechanical Properties of PETG Part Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling, Mater. Today Proceed., 2020, 27, p 1838–1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.79710.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.797 ↗
13. C. Yang, X. Tian, D. Li, Y. Cao, F. Zhao, and C. Shi, Influence of Thermal Processing Conditions in 3D Printing on the Crystallinity and Mechanical Properties of PEEK Material, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2017, 248, p 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.02710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 ↗
14. P. Wang, B. Zou, H. Xiao, S. Ding, and C. Huang, Effects of Printing Parameters of Fused Deposition Modeling on Mechanical Properties, Surface Quality, and Microstructure of PEEK, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 271, p 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.01610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016 ↗
15. H.L. Tekinalp, V. Kunc, G.M. Velez-Garcia, C.E. Duty, L.J. Love, A.K. Naskar, C.A. Blue, and S. Ozcan, Highly Oriented Carbon Fiber–Polymer Composites Via Additive Manufacturing, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2014, 105, p 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
16. B. Brenken, E. Barocio, A. Favaloro, V. Kunc, and R.B. Pipes, Fused Filament Fabrication of Fiber-Reinforced Polymers: A Review, Addit. Manuf.. Manuf., 2018, 21, p 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.01.002 ↗
17. S.M. Kurtz and J.N. Devine, PEEK Biomaterials in Trauma, Orthopedic, and Spinal Implants, Biomaterials, 2007, 28(32), p 4845–4869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 ↗
18. R. Li, Ju. Guanpeng, X. Zhao, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, Hu. Guofang, M. Yan, Wu. Yuyao, and D. Lin, Simulation of Residual Stress and Distortion Evolution in Dual-Robot Collaborative Wire-Arc Additive Manufactured Al-Cu Alloys, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2024.240939010.1080/17452759.2024.2409390 ↗
19. A.T. Marques, S. Esteves, J.P.T. Pereira, and L.M. Oliveira, Additive Manufacturing Hybrid Processes for Composites Systems. Springer Nature, 2020. http://books.google.ie/books?id=ziLgDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Apium+PEEK+450+Natural+Datasheet.+n.d.&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api.
20. S.J. Park, J.E. Lee, J. Park, N.K. Lee, Y. Son, and S.H. Park, High-Temperature 3D Printing of Polyetheretherketone Products: Perspective on Industrial Manufacturing Applications of Super Engineering Plastics, Mater. Des., 2021, 211, p 110163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11016310.1016/j.matdes.2021.110163 ↗
21. B. Hu, X. Duan, Z. Xing, Z. Xu, C. Du, H. Zhou, R. Chen, and B. Shan, Improved Design of Fused Deposition Modeling Equipment for 3D Printing of High-Performance PEEK Parts, Mech. Mater., 2019, 137, p 103139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10313910.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103139 ↗
22. D. Garcia-Gonzalez, A. Rusinek, T. Jankowiak, and A. Arias, Mechanical Impact Behavior of Polyether–Ether–Ketone (PEEK), Compos. Struct., 2015, 124, p 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.06110.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.061 ↗
23. Y. Wang, B. Zou, and C. Huang, Tool Wear Mechanisms and Micro-Channels Quality in Micro-Machining of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Using the Ti(C7N3)-Based Cermet Micro-Mills, Tribol. Int.. Int., 2019, 134, p 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.01.03010.1016/j.triboint.2019.01.030 ↗
24. A. Kaushik, P. Kumar, S. Gahletia, R.K. Garg, A. Kumar, M. Yadav, J. Giri, and D. Chhabra, Optimization of Dual Extrusion Fused Filament Fabrication Process Parameters for 3D Printed Nylon-Reinforced Composites: Pathway to Mobile and Transportation Revolution, SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., 2023 https://doi.org/10.4271/05-17-01-00012610.4271/05-17-01-000126 ↗
25. M. Jyotisman Borah, and L.S. Chandrasekaran, Taguchi-Based Experimental Investigation and Modeling of 3D-Printed PEEK Parts as Biomedical Implants Using Fused Deposition Modeling for Improving Mechanical Strength and Surface Quality, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023, 34(1), p 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-09036-410.1007/s11665-023-09036-4 ↗
26. S. Singh, C. Prakash, and S. Ramakrishna, 3D Printing of Polyether-Ether-Ketone for Biomedical Applications, Eur. Polym. J., 2019, 114, p 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.02.03510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.02.035 ↗
27. W. Wu, P. Geng, G. Li, D. Zhao, H. Zhang, and J. Zhao, Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS, Materials, 2015, 8(9), p 5834–5846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma809527110.3390/ma8095271 ↗
28. J. Pu, C. McIlroy, A. Jones, and I. Ashcroft, Understanding Mechanical Properties in Fused Filament Fabrication of Polyether Ether Ketone, Addit. Manuf.. Manuf., 2021, 37, p 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10167310.1016/j.addma.2020.101673 ↗
29. A. Krishnamoorthy, S. Rajendra Boopathy, K. Palanikumar, and J. Paulo Davim, Application of Grey Fuzzy Logic for the Optimization of Drilling Parameters for CFRP Composites with Multiple Performance Characteristics, Measurement, 2012, 45(5), p 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.01.00810.1016/j.measurement.2012.01.008 ↗
30. D. Bandhu, and K. Abhishek, Assessment of Weld Bead Geometry in Modified Short Circuiting Gas Metal Arc Welding Process for Low Alloy Steel, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2021, 36(12), p 1384–1402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2021.190689710.1080/10426914.2021.1906897 ↗
31. J. Singh, Multi-Objective Optimization of Powder-Mixed EDM Parameters Using Hybrid Grey-ANFIS Artificial Intelligence Technique, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM), 2022, 16(4), p 1533–1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00866-510.1007/s12008-022-00866-5 ↗
32. O. Abedinia, and N. Amjady, Short-Term Wind Power Prediction Based on Hybrid Neural Network and Chaotic Shark Smell Optimization, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol., 2015, 2(3), p 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-015-0029-410.1007/s40684-015-0029-4 ↗
33. D. Kumar and T. Rajmohan, Experimental Investigation of Wear of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Particles-Filled Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone Matrix Composites under Dry Sliding, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 2018, 32(4), p 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270571877286910.1177/0892705718772869 ↗
34. T. Rajmohan and K. Palanikumar, Application of the Central Composite Design in Optimization of Machining Parameters in Drilling Hybrid Metal Matrix Composites, Measurement, 2013, 46(4), p 1470–1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.03410.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.034 ↗
35. L. Ni, J. Chen, G. Chen, D. Zhao, G. Wang, and S.S. Aphale, An Explainable Neural Network Integrating Jiles-Atherton and Nonlinear Auto-Regressive Exogenous Models for Modeling Universal Hysteresis, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 2024, 136, p 108904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.10890410.1016/j.engappai.2024.108904 ↗
36. S. Prabhu, M. Uma, and B.K. Vinayagam, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Interference System Modelling of Carbon Nanotube-Based Electrical Discharge Machining Process, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 2013, 35(4), p 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0047-510.1007/s40430-013-0047-5 ↗
37. N.K. Singh, S. Kumar, Y. Singh, and V. Sharma, predictive Analysis of Surface Finish in Gas-Assisted Electrical Discharge Machining Using Statistical and Soft Computing Techniques, Surf. Rev. Lett., 2019, 27(04), p 1950126. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218625x1950126910.1142/s0218625x19501269 ↗
38. D. Yadav, D. Chhabra, R.K. Gupta, A. Phogat, and A. Ahlawat, Modeling and Analysis of Significant Process Parameters of FDM 3D Printer Using ANFIS, Mater. Today Proceed., 2020, 21, p 1592–1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.22710.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.227 ↗
39. J. Borah and M. Chandrasekaran, Development of ANN Model for Predicting Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed PEEK Polymer Using FDM and Optimization of Process Parameters for Better Mechanical Properties, Phys. Scr., 2024, 99(11), p 116005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad7f0f10.1088/1402-4896/ad7f0f ↗
40. J. Borah and M. Chandrasekaran, Predictive Modeling and Optimization of Rockwell Hardness of Additively Manufactured PEEK Using RSM, ANFIS and RNN Integrated with PSO, Phys. Scr., 2024, 99(8), p 086006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad651410.1088/1402-4896/ad6514 ↗
41. A. Kaushik and R.K. Garg, Searching the Optimal Parameters of a 3D Scanner in Surface Reconstruction of a Dental Model Using Central Composite Design Coupled with Metaheuristic Algorithms, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM), 2023, 18(10), p 7401–7411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01587-10.1007/s12008-023-01587- ↗
42. V.J. Mathai, H.K. Dave, and K.P. Desai, End Wear Compensation During Planetary EDM of Ti-6Al-4V by Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System, Prod. Eng. Res. Devel., 2017, 12(1), p 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-017-0778-810.1007/s11740-017-0778-8 ↗
43. K. Maji and D.K. Pratihar, Forward and Reverse Mappings of Electrical Discharge Machining Process Using Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System, Expert Syst. Appl., 2010, 37(12), p 8566–8574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.01910.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.019 ↗
44. J.S. Jang, ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1993, 23(3), p 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.25654110.1109/21.256541 ↗
45. D.E. Goldberg, Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Boston, Massachusetts, 1989.
46. M. Chandrasekaran, M. Muralidhar, C. Murali Krishna, and U.S. Dixit, Application of Soft Computing Techniques in Machining Performance Prediction and Optimization: A Literature Review, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2010, 46(5–8), p 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2104-x10.1007/s00170-009-2104-x ↗